Men and Women in Suicide Notes: A Corpus-Based Rhetorical Moves Analysis

Jeanyfer Tanusy

doi:10.24071/joll.v22i1.3522

Men and Women in Suicide Notes: A Corpus-Based Rhetorical Moves Analysis

Jeanyfer Tanusy^(1*),

(1) Universitas Kristen Maranatha
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Research on suicide notes has always focused on proving whether the notes are genuine or simulated. There are still very few studies on suicide notes that focus on the genders of the writer and the influence of genders in this type of letter. This research aims to examine the suicide notes in two corpora—one corpus written by males and the other by females—using two different theories. Swales’ move-structure theory is used to see the pattern of occurrence of the rhetorical moves to establish a generic structure of the notes in the two corpora, and Bhatia’s communicative purpose theory is used to see what purposes of communication are dominant in the notes. The notes are analyzed based on the gender of the writers to also examine whether gender plays a role in the use of language, especially for personal communication. The study uses a mixed-method approach, in which a corpus software AntConc is used in the quantitative design to gather more comprehensive data, and linguistic theories are used in the interpretation of the data. The analysis shows that there are differences in the dominant recurring moves and communicative purposes in the two corpora, which suggests the role of gender in determining language use in personal communication. The result of this study is hoped to add to the literature of the study of gender as well as in the broader area of discourse analysis and sociolinguistics.

Keywords

suicide notes; gender; genre; discourse analysis; rhetorical moves

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abaalkhail, A. (2015). Rhetorical Moves in an occluded genre: A qualitative analysis of suicide notes (Master’s thesis). Carleton University. doi: 10.22215/etd/2015-10831

Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language use in Professional Settings. New York: Routledge.

Connor, U. (2000). Variation in rhetorical moves in grant proposals of US humanists and scientists. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 20(1), 1-28. doi:10.1515/text.1.2000.20.1.1

Cotterill, J. (2010). How to use corpus linguistics in forensic linguistics. In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 578-590). New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203856949.ch41

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. New York: Sage Publications, Inc.

Delgado, K. J. (2012). The role of relationships in completed suicide: A gendered analysis of suicide notes. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Wright state University, Dayton, Ohio, USA.

Ho, T. P., Yip, P. S., Chiu, C. W. F., & Halliday, P. (1998). Suicide notes: What do they tell us? Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 98(6), 467-473. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1998.tb10121.x

Holmes, J. (2013). An introduction to Sociolinguistics (4th Edition). New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315833057

Holmes, J. & Meyerhoff, M. (Eds.) (2003). The handbook of language and gender. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. doi:10.1111/b.9780631225034.2004.00029.x

Ioannou, M., & Debowska, A. (2014). Genuine and simulated suicide notes: An analysis of content. Forensic Science International, 245, 151-160. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.10.035

Jones, N. J. & Bennell, C. (2007). The development and validation of statistical prediction rules for discriminating between genuine and simulated suicide notes. Archives of Suicide Research, 11(2), 219-233. doi:10.1080/13811110701250176

Joseph, R., Lim, J. M. H., & Nor, N. A. M. (2014). Communicative moves in forestry research introductions: Implications for the design of learning materials. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 134, 53-69. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.224

Lakoff, R. T. (1975). Language and the Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row Publisher Inc.

Leenaars, A.A. (1988). Suicide Notes: Predictive Clues and Patterns. New York: Human Sciences Press.

Lester, D., & Heim, N. (1992). Sex differences in suicide notes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75(2), 582-582. doi:10.2466/pms.1992.75.2.582

Lester, D. (2008). Differences between genuine and simulated suicide notes. Psychological Reports, 103, 527-528. doi:10.2466/pr0.103.6.527-528

O’Connor, R. C., & Leenaars, A. A. (2004). A thematic comparison of suicide notes drawn from Northern Ireland and the United States. Current Psychology, 22(4), 339-347. doi:10.1007/s12144-004-1039-5

Parodi, G. (2014). Genre organization in specialized discourse: Disciplinary variation across university textbooks. Discourse Studies, 16(1), 65-87. doi:10.1177/1461445613496355

Priyadi, S. & Setiawan, S. (2015). Features of man and woman language used by two main characters in Winds of Evil novel: Gender perspective. Language Horizon, 3(1), 102-109.

Roubidoux, S. (2012). Linguistic Manifestation of Power in Suicide Notes: An Investigation of Personal Pronouns. (Master’s thesis). University of Wisconsin Oskhosh.

Samraj, B. & Gawron, J.M. (2015). The suicide notes as a genre: Implications for genre theory. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, p. 88-101. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2015.04.006

Schoene, A.M. & Dethlefs, N. (2016) Automatic Identification of suicide notes from linguistic and sentiment features. Proceeding of the 10th SIGHUM Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and Humanities (LaTeCH), 128-133. doi:10.18653/v1/w16-2116

Shapero, J,J. & Blackwell, S.A. (2012). ‘There are letters for you all on the sideboard’: what can linguists learn from multiple suicide-note writers?. Proceeding of The International Association of Forensic Linguists’ Tenth Biennial Conference, 225-244.

Shapero, J. J. (2011). The language of suicide notes. Doctoral dissertation. University of Birmingham.

Simaremare, H. S., Murni, S. M., &Saragih, A. (2017). Linguistic characteristics of male and female students with different cultuers using language in boarding house. Jurnal Linguistik Terapan Pascasarjana, 14(3), 213-222. doi:10.24114/lt.v14i3.11261

Stanley, L., & Jolly, M. (2005). Letters as / not a genre. Life Writing, 2(2), 91-118. doi:10.1080/10408340308518291

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, selected 45–47, 52–60. The Discourse Studies Reader, 306–316. doi:10.1075/z.184.513swa

Swales, J. (1996). Occluded genres in the academy: The case of the submission letter. In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp. 45-58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. doi:10.1075/pbns.41.06swa

Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/cbo9781139524827

Tadros, G. & McGrath, M. (2004). A comparison of suicide notes written by younger and older adults. Poster presentation at the Annual General Meeting of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, 6-9 July 2004, Harrogate.

Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don’t Understand. New York: Harper Collins.

Tanusy, J. (2017). Genre analysis of suicide notes (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Tessuto, G. (2015). Generic structure and rhetorical moves in English-language empirical law research articles: Sites of interdisciplinary and interdiscursive cross-over. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 13-26. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.002

Williams, C. (2011). Research methods. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 5(3).

Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An introduction to sociolinguistics (5th Edition). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

World Health Organization. (2021). Global suicide mortality rate. Mental health. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mental_health/prevention/suicide/suicideprevent/en/

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v22i1.3522