A Critical Discourse Analysis of Selected Utterances of State Actors on the 2019 Xenophobic Attacks on Nigerians in South Africa

Damilola Oluseyi Fafiyebi

doi:10.24071/joll.v20i2.2394

A Critical Discourse Analysis of Selected Utterances of State Actors on the 2019 Xenophobic Attacks on Nigerians in South Africa

Damilola Oluseyi Fafiyebi

Abstract

The study examined the discourse strategies employed by state actors in expressing their views on the 2019 xenophobic attack in South Africa. The objective is to examine how this group of people explores the provisions of critical discourse to shape and pattern their communicative intention. The data employed for the study were sourced from selected online media sources between September and November 2019. The study employed the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) approach with a particular focus on the Discourse Historical Approach framework proposed by Wodak (2001) as its theoretical springboard. The study established that different state actors from each of the countries under scrutiny engage in positive self and negative others presentation. This showed that from their discourses, it can be deduced that the state actors were all out to launder the image of their respective countries on the one hand and that of the kith and kin on the other hand.

Keywords

xenophobia; state actors; critical discourse analysis; discourse strategies

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ademilokun, M. A. (2018) Discursive construction of Nigeria’s economic crisis in the media texts of state actors (2016-2017) Obitun Journal of the Humanities: Ekiti State University, 9, 148-165.

Amossy R. (2018) Understanding Political Issues through Argumentation Analysis in Wodak, R. & Forchtner, B. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics. New York: Routledge.

Arthemis, A. & Monika, R. (2010) The syntax of nominalisations across languages and frameworks. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Caffy, C. (2006) Mitigation. Edinburgh: Elsevier Ltd.

Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. T.Van Dijk (ed.), Discourse Studies. A Multidisciplinary Introduction, 2, 258-84. London: Sage.

Gee, J. (2005) An Introduction to Discourse analysis. New York: Routledge

Gumperz, J. (1982) Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics: Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1989) Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harris, B. (2000). Xenophobia: A new pathology for a new South Africa. In Hook, D. & Eagle, G. (eds) Psychopathology and Social Prejudice. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.

Joseph, J. (2006) Identity and Language. Edinburgh: Elsevier Ltd.

Kollapan, J. (1999). Xenophobia in South Africa: The challenge to forced migration. Unpublished seminar proceedings, 7 October. Graduate School: University of the Witwatersrand.

Van-Leeuwen, T. (2006) Critical Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Elsevier Limited.

Morris, A. (1998). 'Our fellow Africans make our lives hell': The lives of Congolese and Nigerians living in Johannesburg. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 21 (6), 1116—1136.

van Dijk, T. (1997) Discourse Studies. A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.

van Dijk, T. (2002) Multidisciplinary Critical Discourse Analysis: A Plea for Diversity. In Wodak, R & Meyer, M. (ed) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 95-180. London: Sage.

Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage Publications.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v20i2.2394