CROSSCUTTING RELIGIOUS EDUCATION FOR A BETTER SELF-UNDERSTANDING AS A RESPONSE TO RELIGIOUS EXTREMISM

Setyawan Andreas(1*),

(1) Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Interreligious education has been recognized as alternative for mono-religious and multi-religious education in the Western World since 1990’s. This model underscores plurality both as a part of departure and as a possible result of religious education and at the same time it avoids a purely objective approach to the multitude of religions. However, there has been hardly any trace of interreligious education in Indonesia and in fact, even some people agree to abolish mono-religious education in the schools, which is considered to be vulnerable to favouritism and communal tensions. This study proposes a certain way of learning called cross-cutting religious education which may be applied within mono-religious model. The main concern is the following research questions: To what extent can crosscutting religious education lead to moderation and how can it provide cognitive, affective, and attitudinal dimensions which are required to restrain the tendency of religious extremism? The author argues that a crosscutting religious education in high schools through religious literature provides a better self-understanding which in the long term reduces the tendency of religious extremism. Thus, the study shows a method of hermeneutics which results in a better self-understanding of certain religious tradition based on the reading of different religious tradition texts.


Keywords


interreligious learning, mono-religious model, hermeneutics, religious extremism, cross-cutting

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amin, K. (2013). Evaluating religious education. The Jakarta Post, 15 Nov. Retrieved on May 25, 2017, from http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2013/11/15/evaluating-religious- education.html

Berling, J. (2004). Understanding other religious worlds: A guide for interreligious education. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.

Chang, R. (Ed). (1997). Incommensurability, incomparability, and practical reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Fisoni, V. (2005). From the encounter to the dialogue. A Parte Rei, 40. Retrieved on May 20, 2017, from http://serbal.pntic.mec.es/~cmunoz11/fisogni40.pdf

Gallagher, M. P. (2003). Clashing symbols: An introduction to faith and culture. London: Darton, Longman & Todd.

Grad, I. (2014). Religion, advertising, and production of meaning. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 13(38), 137-154.

Haryatmoko. (2016). Membongkar rezim kepastian: Pemikiran kritis post- strukturalis. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Jackson, R. (2016). Religious education in European organisations, professional associations and research groups. In Jenny Berglund et al. (Eds.) Religious Education in a Global-Local World. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG.

Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in plural societies: A comparative exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Navis, A.A. (2010). Robohnya surau kami. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Pollefeyt, D. (Ed.). (2007). Interreligious learning. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

Powell, A. (1990). What is narrative criticism? Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press.

Ricoeur, P. (1991). From text to action: Essays in hermeneutics II. Evanston: North Western University Press.

Simms, K. (2003). Paul Ricoeur. New York: Routledge.

Sterkens, C. (2001). Interreligious learning: The problem of interreligious dialogue in primary education. Leiden: Brill.

Ullah, K. (2015). Why do people become Islamist extremists? YouTube, uploaded by PragerU, 15 June, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IchGuL501U.

Ward, G. (2005). Cultural transformation and religious practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yusuf, M. (2016). Religious education in Indonesia: An empirical study of religious education model in Islamic, Christian and Hindu affiliated schools. Berlin: LIT Verlag.

Yusuf, M. & Sterkens, C. (2015). Analyzing the state’s laws on religious education in post-new order Indonesia. Al-Jāmi’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 53(1), 105-130.

Ziebertz, H. (1993). Religious pluralism and religious education. Journal of Empirical Theology, 6(2), 82-99.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.v1i2.624

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Setyawan Andreas

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Indexed and abstracted in:

 


IJIET Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)

We would like to inform you that IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching):has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 5 No 2, 2021 until Vol 10 No 1, 2026.


 


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

IJIET DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet

p-ISSN: 2548-8422 (since 5 January 2017); e-ISSN: 2548-8430 (since 5 January 2017)

 

Flag Counter


IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching) is published twice a year, namely in January and July, by the Institute for Research and Community Services of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.