Email this article 
FUNCTIONS OF THE SUFFIX –MOST IN ENGLISH
(1) Universitas Katolik Santo Agustinus Hippo, West Kalimantan
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This paper explored the functions of the suffix –most in English and the formation of new categories of the suffix -most by analyzing the words containing it. This quantitative descriptive study collected the data from Wordbyletter.com and the online Oxford English Dictionary (OED). The text-based document analysis examined 40 words having the suffix -most. Results showed that four functions of the suffix –most, namely to form: a noun into an adjective (25%), an adjective into an adjective (45%), an adverb into an adjective (15%), and a preposition into an adjective (15%). It was analyzed that the usage frequency of several words represents all the grammatical categories of the suffix –most based on the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Firstly, foremost functioning as noun formation occurred 7,078 times. Secondly, lowermost functioning as adjective formation occurred 40 times. Thirdly, the uppermost functioning as adverb formation appeared 532 times. Lastly, aftermost functioning as preposition formation occurred twice only.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adisutrisno, D. W. (2013). English morphology. Magister Scientiae, (33), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.33508/mgs.v0i33.607
Al-Mutmainah., Jos, E., Ohoiwutun., Waris, A. (2014). Teaching derivational suffixes to improve the vocabulary mastery through reading text. E-Journal of English Language Teaching Society (ELTS), 2(1), 1-11.
Altay, İ. (2006). Ways of creating prefixes and suffixes and foreign language teaching. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 56-71.
Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself. London: MIT Press.
Bauer, L. (2003). Introducing linguistic morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Brinton, L. J., & Brinton, D. (2010). The linguistic structure of modern English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Charles, O., B. (2018). Affixation in Uwu language. Global Journal of Human-Social Science: G Linguistics & Education, 18(11), 34-39.
Davies, M. (2008) The corpus of contemporary American English (COCA): 520 million words, 1990-present. Available online at http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.
Etikan, I,. Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R.S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Fortes-Galvan, F. C., & Roxas, R. E. (2006, November). A constraint-based morphological analyzer for concatenative and non-concatenative morphology. In Proceedings of the 20th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (pp. 273-279).
Giyatmi, G. (2019). Morphology for English language teaching. Proceeding of the 2nd ICoLLiT (International Conference on Language, Literature, and Teaching) 2019.
Halawa, A. (2017). An analysis of derivational and inflectional English morphemes. Jurnal Ilmiah Langue and Parole, 1(1), 132-144. https://doi.org/10.36057/jilp.v1i1.13
Haspelmath M., & Sims, A.D. (2010). Understanding morphology (2nd ed.). London: Hodder Education.
Herman, H. (2015). Suffixes found in narrative writing at grade eight of SMP Methodist Pematangsiantar. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 20(4), 40-48. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-20444048
Kazemian, B., & Hashemi, S. (2014). A contrastive linguistic analysis of inflectional bound morphemes of English, Azerbaijani and Persian languages: A comparative study. Journal of Education & Human Development, 3(1), 593-614.
Kolenchery, G. (2015). Analytical components of morphology in linguistics. Global English-Oriented Research Journal, 1(1), 161-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.5082.7609
Lieber, R. (2009). Introducing morphology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Luthfiyati, D., Kholiq, A., & Zahroh, I. N. M. (2017). The analysis of word formation processes in the Jakarta Post website. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 1(1), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v1i1.30
Martini, I. D. A. K. (2016). Derivational of bound morpheme. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 3(1), 15-22.
Maulidia, S. N., Brilian, A., Safitri, M., Firdaus, R., Evansam, R. G., & Siswanto, A. (2017). Morpheme analysis of English language. JOSAR (Journal of Students Academic Research), 2(1), 37-47.
Maulidina, S., Indriyani, F., Mardewi, T. (2019). Derivational and inflectional morphemes in the Jakarta Post. Journal of English and Teaching Research, 4(2), 104-122. https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v4i2.13625
Nur, D. R., & Kirom, A. (2016). An analysis of derivational affixes in commencement speech by Steve Jobs. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching, 1(1), 25-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.24903/sj.v1i1.18
Nurjanah, S. Y., Ramdhaniah, A., & Efransyah, M. (2018). Affixation of derivational and inflectional process in narrative text entitled the ugly duckling. Project (Professional Journal of English Education), 1(3), 309-318. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v1i3.p309-318
Oxford English Dictionary. (2020). London: Oxford University Press.
Raja, L. V. (2014). Word formation: A morphological analysis. Journal of Language and Literature, 14(1), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v14i1.401
Ramadan, S. (2015). Morphological errors made by Jordanian university students. Romanian Journal of English Studies, 12(1), 40-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/rjes-2015-0006
Roaini, R., & Ansar, F. A. (2019). Prefix and suffix analysis in relation with students English ability. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 12(1), 49-62.
Rugaiyah, R. (2018). Derivational and inflectional morphemes: A morphological analisis. J-SHMIC (Journal of English for Academic), 5(2), 73-86. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2018.vol5(2).1887
Somathasan, M. (2018). The study of affixes (prefixes and suffixes): An ESL and innovative approach. International Journal of Applied Research, 4(11), 1-5.
Susilawati, S., & Putri, F. B. (2018). Derivation and affixation process in speech of Dananjaya Hettiarachchi. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 1(3), 217-224. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v1i3.p217-224
Tambusai, A., Nasution, K., Widayati, D., & Jufrizal, J. (2016) Morphological typology of affixes in Riau Malay Azhary Tambusai. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(8), 43-53.
Tariq, T.R., Abid, M., Sultan, B., Asif, M., & Rafique, N. (2020). An Analysis of Derivational and Inflectional Morphemes. International Journal of Linguistics, 12(01), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v12i1.16084
Word ending with suffix (-most). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.wordbyletter.com
Zainuddin. (2016). A study on derivational affixes of Indonesian noun-formation in newspaper editorial: A semantic perspective. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(3), 148–155.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/uc.v4i2.7595
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Efrika Siboro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
UC Journal is indexed in:
UC Journal Sinta 4 Certificate (S4 = Level 4)
We would like to inform you that UC Journal: ELT, Linguistics and Literature Journal, or UC Journal has been nationally accredited Sinta 4 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree No. Surat Keputusan 152/E/KPT/2023. Validity for 5 years: Vol 2 No 1, 2021 till Vol 6 No 2, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/uc
e-ISSN (validity starting Vol 1, No 2, November 2020): 2774-9401
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
UC Journal: ELT, Linguistics and Literature Journal, a scientific peer-reviewed journal, was established in 20 May 2020 and is published twice a year, namely in May and November, by the English Language Education Study Programme (S1/Sarjana PBI) in collaboration with the English Education Master's Programme (S2/Magister PBI) of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.