POLITENESS STRATEGIES OF THE MAIN CHARACTERS IN THE FAULT IN OUR STARS NOVEL

Meilina Putri Dewanti(1*),

(1) Discovery English
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This paper explored politeness strategies and resolved two research questions, namely what politeness strategies were applied by the main characters in The Fault in Our Stars novel and what factors influenced the use of politeness strategies by the main characters in the novel. Data, consisting of 263 utterances containing politeness strategies, were collected from The Fault in Our Stars novel and were analyzed using a document analysis method. Results showed that the main two characters, namely Augustus and Hazel, applied four politeness strategies, which were distributed as follows: positive politeness, as the most frequently-used strategy with a frequency of 100 utterances (38%), followed by off record, 59 utterances (22.4%), bald on record, 54 utterances (20.6%), and negative politeness, 50 utterances (19%). The strategies that were used by the two main characters were affected by two main factors, namely the payoffs and the circumstances or sociological variables.


Keywords


main character, politeness, politeness strategies, The Fault in Our Stars

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adel, S. M. R., Davoudi, M., & Ramezanzadeh, A. (2016). A qualitative study of politeness strategies used by Iranian EFL learners in a class blog. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 47-62.

Alsulami, S. Q. (2015). The effectiveness of social distance on requests. Arab World English Journal, 6(3). 382-395. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol6no3.24

Amadi, S. C. & Ken-Maduako, I. (2019). An analysis of linguistic politeness’ strategies in a superior/subordinate communication: A speech event in a university setting. KIU Journal of Humanities, 4(1), 29-38.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A. & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: University Press.

Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals of language usage. Cambridge: University Press.

Chen, W. (2016). Ellipsis and cognitive semantics. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(11), 2134-2139. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0611.10

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Elisdawati, Y, Husein, R. & Setia, E. (2018). Teachers’ politeness strategies in motivating students to learn English. KnE Social Sciences, 3(4), 964-975. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i4.2004

Febiyani, F. & Fitriana, R. (2019). Politeness strategies used by the member of Student Youth Community (SYC) Widya Gama Mahakam University. BORJU: Borneo Educational Journal, 1(1), 1-13.

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behaviour. London: Penguin University Books.

Green, J. (2012). The Fault in Our Stars. New York: The Penguin Group.

Herk, G. V. (2012). What is sociolinguistics? West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

Kamlasi, I. (2017). The positive politeness in conversations performed by the students of English Study Program of Timor University. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 1(2), 68-81.

Kedves, A. (2013). Face threatening acts and politeness strategies in summer school application calls. Jezikoslovlje, 14(2), 431–444.

Mahmud, M. (2018). The use of politeness strategies in the classroom context by English University Students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 597-606. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15258

Maskuri, K. D. S., Tarjana, S., Djatmika, D. & Purnanto, D. (2019). Politeness strategies in directive speech acts in local Indonesian parliament assembly proceedings. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(3), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n3p85

Miller, G. A. (1951). Language and communication. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Mills, S. (2003). Gender and politeness. Cambridge: University Press.

Mohajan, H. K. (2018). qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment, and People, 7(1), 23-48.

Regehr, C., & Gutheil, T. (2002). Apology, justice, and trauma recovery. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 30(3), 425-430.

Rosari, M. (2016). Politeness strategies applied by the characters of The Great Debaters movie. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching Journal, 19(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.2016.190103

Sari, C. P. (2017). Speech acts and the different perspectives on the meaning of “very sorry” in the letter on Hainan Island incident. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 20(1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.2017.200102

Searle, J. R. (1974). Speech acts. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press

Stalnaker, R. C. (1970). Semantics of natural language. Synthese, 22, 272-289.

Sülü, A. (2015). Teacher’s politeness in EFL class. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 2(4), 216-221. http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/76/115

Wang, F. (2014). A model of translation of politeness based on relevance theory. Open Journal of Social Science, 2, 270-277.

Watts, R. J., Ide, S., & Ehlich, K. (Eds.). (1992). Politeness in language: Studies in its history, and practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Widiadnya, I. G. N. B. Y., Seken, K., & Santoso, M. H. (2018). The implications of politeness strategies among teachers and students in the classroom. SHS Web of Conferences, 42, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200067

Yasmeen, R., Jabeen, M., & Akram, A. (2014). Politeness and the language of Pakistani politicians. Academic Research International, 5(3), 245-253.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/uc.v3i1.4804

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Meilina Putri Dewanti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

UC Journal is indexed in:

     

 

UC Journal Sinta 4 Certificate (S4 = Level 4)

We would like to inform you that UC Journal: ELT, Linguistics and Literature Journal, or UC Journal has been nationally accredited Sinta 4 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 152/E/KPT/2023. Validity for 5 years: Vol 2 No 1, 2021 till Vol 6 No 2, 2025

 

 

 

 

Flag Counter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/uc

e-ISSN (validity starting Vol 1, No 2, November 2020): 2774-9401

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

 UC Journal: ELT, Linguistics and Literature Journal, a scientific peer-reviewed journal, was established in 20 May 2020 and is published twice a year, namely in May and November, by the English Language Education Study Programme (S1/Sarjana PBI) in collaboration with the English Education Master's Programme (S2/Magister PBI) of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

 

slot gacor slot