RHETORICAL PROBLEMS OF INDONESIAN RESEARCH ARTICLE RESULTS AND DISCUSSION IN THE HISTORY AND LAW DISCIPLINES
(1) Universitas Islam Makassar, Indonesia
(2) University of New England, Australia
(3) University of New England, Australia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The number of rhetorical studies of research articles (RAs) using a genre approach has increased greatly. However, studies on this area in Indonesian research articles (RAs) published in accredited journals are still limited. None has investigated the rhetorical structures of Indonesian History and Law research article results and discussions (RARDs) published in Indonesian accredited journals. Thus, the present study aims to analyse them rhetorically using English rhetorical models, one is from Tessuto (2015) and the other one is from Hopkins and Dudley-Evans (1988). The reason for employing these models is to determine whether the models could represent the rhetorical structure of the present data sets. These models were alternately tested against both data sets. The results showed that the rhetorical structures of both Indonesian History and Law RARDs are different from those presented in the English-tested models, and the analysis results showed that the present data have their models. These differences indicate problems for Indonesian authors in these two selected disciplines when publishing RAs in reputable English journals. Thus, these findings may contribute to English for Academic Purposes (EAP) for teaching instruction for publishing RAs in reputable English journals for authors in the two disciplines.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abbasi Montazeri, E., Jalilifar, A., & Hita, J. A. (2021). Evaluative language in applied linguistics research article discussions: Exploring the functions and patterns of that-structures in argumentative texts. Language Awareness, 32(1), 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1990938
Adnan, Z. (2009). Some potential problems for research articles written by Indonesian academics when submitted to international English language journals. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 11(1), 107-125.
Adnan, Z. (2010). Rhetorical patterns of Indonesian research articles: A genre of Indonesian academic writing. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr Müller.
Adnan, Z. (2011). ‘Ideal-problem-solution’(IPS) model: A discourse model of research article introductions (RAIS) in education. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 34(1), 75-103. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.34.1.05adn
Afshar, H. S., Doosti, M., & Movassagh, H. (2018). A comparative study of generic structure of applied linguistics and chemistry research articles: The case of discussions. Research in Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 28-56. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2018.13404
Alharbi, S. (2016). Schematic structure of discussion of results sections in the field of dentistry: A comparison of international and local English-medium journals. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 7(2), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2814814
Alotaibi, H. S. (2021). Taking an authorial stance in English and Arabic research article discussions. Pragmatics and Society, 12(3), 461-487. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.18044.alo
Al-Shujairi, Y. B. J., Tan, H., Abdullah, A. N., Nimehchisalem, V., & Imm, L. G. (2019). Moving in the right direction in the discussion section of research articles. Journal of Language and Communication (JLC), 6(2), 143-158.
Amnuai, W. (2017). The textual organization of the discussion sections of accounting research articles. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 40(2), 389-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.10.007
Arsyad, S. (2000). Rhetorical structure analysis of the Indonesian research articles [Doctor of Philosopy thesis, Australian National University of Canberra, Australia].
Arsyad, S. (2013a). A genre-based analysis of Indonesian research articles in the social sciences and humanities written by Indonesian speakers. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 8(3), 234-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2013.849711
Arsyad, S. (2013b). A genre-based analysis of the discussion section of research articles in Indonesian written by Indonesian speakers. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(4), 50-70. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v5i4.3773
Arsyad, S. (2013c). A genre-based analysis of the introductions of research articles written by Indonesian academics. TEFLIN Journal, 24(2), 180-200. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v24i2/180-200
Arsyad, S. (2014). The discourse structure and linguistic features of research article abstracts in English by Indonesian academics. Online Submission, 10(2), 191-223.
Arsyad, S., & Adila, D. (2018). Using local style when writing in English: The citing behaviour of Indonesian authors in English research article introductions. Asian Englishes, 20(2), 170-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2017.1327835
Arsyad, S., & Arono, A. (2016). Potential problematic rhetorical style transfer from first language to foreign language: A case of Indonesian authors writing research article introductions in English. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 11(3), 315-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2016.1153642
Arsyad, S., Purwo, B. K., & Adnan, Z. (2020). The argument style in research article discussions to support research findings in language studies. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 290-307. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16626
Arsyad, S., Zaim, M., & Susyla, D. (2018). Review and citation style in research article introductions: A comparative study between national and international English-medium journals in medical sciences. Discourse and Interaction, 11(1), 28-51. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2018-1-28
Arsyad, S., Zaim, M., Ramadhan, S., & Lubis, A. A. (2020). The argument style of research article discussions by non-native authors of English published in international journals. Journal of Applied Linguistics & Literature (JOALL), 5(2), 193-212. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v5i2.11268
Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.09.001
Cheng, F. W. (2021). Crafting theoretical value in management research article discussion sections. Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos (AELFE), (41), 61-82. https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.41.61
Cheng, F.-W. (2020). Negotiating theoretical implication in management research article discussions. ESP Today, 8(1), 90-113. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2020.8.1.5
Cheng, F.-W., & Unsworth, L. (2016). Stance-taking as negotiating academic conflict in applied linguistics research article discussion sections. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.09.001
Dobakhti, L. (2013). Commenting on findings in qualitative and quantitative research articles’ discussion sections in applied linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 2(5), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.2n.5p.145
Dobakhti, L., & Zohrabi, M. (2018). Citation behaviours of applied linguists in discussion sections of research articles. Applied Research on English Language, 7(2), 215-236. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2018.108465.1209
Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7(2), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(88)90029-4
Jin, B. (2021). A multi-dimensional analysis of research article discussion sections in an engineering discipline: Corpus explorations and scientists’ perceptions. SAGE Open, 11(4), 21582440211050401. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211050401
Joseph, R., & Lim, J. M.-H. (2018). Background information in the discussion sections of forestry journals: A case study. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 18(1), 198-216. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2018-1801-12
Khalili, A., Farrokhi, F., & Aslanabadi, M. (2016). Application of native speaker models for identifying deviations in rhetorical moves in non-native speaker manuscripts. Research and Development in Medical Education, 5(1), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.15171/rdme.2016.005
Kim, L. C., Evans, M. S., Lim, J. M.-H., & Akkakoson, S. (2016). A comparison between Malay and English research article discussions: A move analysis. SAGE Open, 6(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016652925
Kirilenko, A. P., & Stepchenkova, S. (2016). Inter-coder agreement in one-to-many classification: Fuzzy kappa. PloS One, 11(3), e0149787. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149787
Liu, M. S.-M., & Lim, J. M.-H. (2014). How do writers evaluate their own empirical research? A genre-based inquiry into economics journal papers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.219
Loi, C. K., Lim, J. M. H., & Wharton, S. (2016). Expressing an evaluative stance in English and Malay research article conclusions: International publications versus local publications. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.08.004
Lubis, A. H. (2020). The argumentation structure of research article 'findings and discussion' sections written by non-native English speaker novice writers: A case of Indonesian undergraduate students. Asian Englishes, 22(2), 143-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2019.1669300
Mirahayuni, N. K. (2002). Investigating generic structure of English research articles: Writing strategy differences between English and Indonesian writers. TEFLIN Journal, 13(1), 22-57. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v13i1/22-57
Moyano, E. I. (2019). Knowledge construction in discussions of research articles in two disciplines in Spanish: The role of resources of appraisal. Journal of Pragmatics, 139, 231-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.09.011
Moyetta, D. (2016). The discussion section of English and Spanish research articles in psychology: A contrastive study. Esp Today–Journal of English for Specific Purposes at Tertiary Level, 4(1), 87-106.
Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30(4), 479-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00050-7
Ruiying, Y., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00026-1
Sadeghi, K., & Alinasab, M. (2020). Academic conflict in applied linguistics research article discussions: The case of native and non-native writers. English for Specific Purposes, 59, 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.03.001
Samanhudi, U. (2017). Introduction of research articles in applied linguistics by Indonesian and English academics. IRJE| Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 1(1)58-71. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v1i1.4339
Samanhudi, U., & O'Boyle, A. (2022). Citation practice in research articles in Indonesia-based journals and international journals. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 9(4), 741-751. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2104741S
Sandy, W., & Shen, H. (2019). Publish to earn incentives: How do Indonesian professors respond to the new policy? Higher Education, 77(2), 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0271-0
Suherdi, D., Kurniawan, E., & Lubis, A. H. (2020). A genre analysis of the research article ‘findings and discussion’ sections written by Indonesian undergraduate EFL students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i1.24989
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tessuto, G. (2015). Generic structure and rhetorical moves in English-language empirical law research articles: Sites of interdisciplinary and interdiscursive cross-over. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.002
Warsidi, W. (2021). Rhetorical patterns of indonesian research articles in law and history disciplines: A genre-based analysis [Dissertation, University of New England, Australia].
Warsidi, W. (2024a). The rhetorical model of English sales copies posted on Instagram. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 27(1), 305-319. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v24i2.6455
Warsidi, W. (2024b). The rhetorical model of Indonesian research article introductions (RAIs) in the law discipline: Problems and opportunities. Journal of Language and Literature, 24(2), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v24i2.6455
Warsidi, W., & Adnan, Z. (2024). The rhetorical strategies to create incremental innovation in applied linguistics research articles. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 9(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v9i1.29780
Warsidi, W., & Maniam, V. (2024). Academic conflicts in research articles discussion: The case of Indonesian and Malaysian authors. Issues in Language Studies, 13(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.5865.2024
Warsidi, W., Adnan, Z., & Maniam, V. (2024). A contrastive genre-based study of English and Indonesian RAIs in the history discipline. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(1), 467-488.
Warsidi, W., Damayanti, N., & Syurganda, A. (2024). The rhetorical model of IELTS speaking test band 7 or above. Premise: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 429-445. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v13i2.9256
Warsidi, W., Irawan, A. M., Adnan, Z., & Samad, I. A. (2023). Citation studies in English vs. Indonesian research article introductions (RAIs) in the history discipline. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(2), 598-613. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i2.28343
Yanita, H. (2016). Analisis struktur retorika dan penanda kebahasaan bagian hasil dan pembahasan artikel jurnal penelitian bisa FKIP UNIB untuk bidang pengajaran bahasa. Diksa: Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 2(2), 165-170. https://doi.org/10.33369/diksa.v2i2.3457
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v28i1.9095
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Warsidi Warsidi, Zifirdaus Adnan, Vegnes Maniam

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indexed and abstracted in:
LLT Journal Sinta 1 Certificate (S1 = Level 1)
We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 1 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree No. Surat Keputusan 10/C/C 3/DT.05.00/2025. Validity for 5 years: Vol 26 No 2 2023 till Vol 31 No 1 2028.
Sinta 1 certificate to post here asap. Thank you for your patience and understanding.
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.