Email this article STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVES ON THE TEACHERS’ WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN ONLINE PROFESSIONAL NARRATIVE WRITING CLASS
Abstract
This research aimed to find out students' perspectives on the teachers' written corrective feedback in online Professional Narrative Writing classes and discover the types of the teachers' written corrective feedback that Professional Narrative Writing students prefer to help them revise their writing. Thus, the research questions of this study were (1) What are the students' perspectives on the teachers' written corrective feedback in online Professional Narrative Writing class? and (2) What are the types of the teachers' written corrective feedback that the students prefer to get to help them revise their writing in Professional Narrative Writing class? The participants of this study were thirty-four (34) students from three online Professional Narrative Writing classes in Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana. This study was conducted from September until December 2021. Also, the data collection instruments used open-ended and closed-ended questionnaires and interviews. The findings showed that the participants had positive and negative perspectives toward the teachers' written corrective feedback in online Professional Narrative Writing class. Then, the most preferred type of the teachers' written corrective feedback was indirect feedback since the participants believed it could help them revise their essays. Therefore, the findings of this study were expected to be useful for teachers in giving effective written corrective feedback.
Keywords: students' perspectives, the teachers' written corrective feedback, online professional narrative writing class
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anne, W. (2017). Direct vs. indirect written corrective feedback: Student perceptions. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura, 22(1), 17-40. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n01a02
Anggraini, D. (2018). Students’ perspective toward teacher’s written corrective feedback on students' writing in paragraph writing class. Retrieved 13 January 2021, from https://repository.unja.ac.id/2981/
Aridah. (2016). The effectiveness of direct and indirect written corrective feedback in EFL writing performance. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Seminar on English Language and Teaching (ISELT-4) (pp. 105-115). Retrieved 24 September 2022, from http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/selt/article/viewFile/6917/5451#:~:text=Direct%20feedback%20is%20the%20feedback,them%20(Ellis%2C%202009
Chen, J., Lin, J., & Jiang, L. (2016). Corrective feedback in SLA: Theoretical relevance and empirical research. English Language Teaching, 9(11), 85-94. https://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n11p85
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Efriana, L. (2021). Problems of online learning during COVID-19 pandemic in EFL classroom and the solution. Jelita: Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature, 2(1), 38-47. Retrieved 5 April 2021, from https://jurnal.stkipmb.ac.id/index.php/jelita/article/view/74
Hamied, F. A., & Emilia, E. (2016). Exploring an academic writing class in an Indonesian university context. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 11(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v11i1.7842
Han, E. (2013). Skill building writing class design: Reflections of triangular writing process. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 141-157. Retrieved 25 February, 2021, from http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=4c390780-09ff-4cf0-95a4-29c46bb69cb3%40sessionmgr4006
Hosseiny, M. (2014). The role of direct and indirect written corrective feedback in improving Iranian EFL students' writing skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 668-674. Retrieved 23 February 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.466
Iswandari, Y. A. (2016). Written corrective feedback in writing class: Students’ preferences and types of errors. Jurnal Penelitian, 20(1), 1-9. Retrieved 13 January 2021, from https://repository.usd.ac.id/8777/
Kileri, Z.H., & Listyani. (2021). Academic Writing students’ perceptions on teacher feedback. Prominent Journal, 4(21), 106-115. https://doi.org/10.24176/pro.v4i2.6187
Listyani. (2019). The essence of a good teacher. The journal of Asia TEFL, 16(4), Winter 2019, 1396-1403. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.4.23.1396
Listyani. (2021). EFL writing students’ responses towards teacher feedback to enhance their writing quality. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1101.03
Nam, E. H., & Seong, M. H. (2020). Teaching activities and students’ preferences in integrated college English reading and writing classes. English Teaching, 75(2), 69- 91. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.75.2.202006.69
Pabur, H. E., & Liando, N. V. F. (2018). A perspective on written corrective feedback. Retrieved 13 January, 2021, from http://repository.unima.ac.id/bitstream/123456789/274/1/No.%2024%20GCES%2020 18%20Proceeding%20-%20Pabur%20%26%20Liando.pdf
Pan, X., & Shao, H. (2020). Teacher online feedback and learning motivation: Learning engagement as a mediator. Social Behavior and Personality, 48(6), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.9118
Professional Narrative Writing Online Syllabus (2020). English Language Education Program (ELEP), Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga, Indonesia.
Rofiqoh, M., & Chakim, N. (2020). Written and oral feedback in writing class. RETAIN, 8(02), 57-65. Retrieved 13 January 2021, from https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/43/article/view/33435/30357
Rosdiana. (2016). Students’ perception toward written corrective feedback in Writing classroom. Retrieved 13 January 2021, from https://www.neliti.com/publications/217635/students-perception-toward-written-corrective-feedback-in-writing-classroom
Sari, M, A. (2017). Students’ response of teacher’s written feedback on their writing. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 10(2), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v10i2.1752
Seo, Y., & Kim, C. (2020). The use of short fiction in a writing class: Pedagogical suggestions for secondary level teachers in EFL settings. English Teaching, 75(1), 119-139. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.75.1.202003.119
Tursina, P. & Chuang, M.T. (2016). Direct and indirect corrective feedback on EFL students' writing performance. EEIC, 1(2), 209-214. Retrieved 24 September 2022, from http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/EEIC/article/view/15894/11885
Wicaksono, W. P. (2017). Types and frequencies of written corrective feedbacks in adult ESL classroom. Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies, 3(2), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijels.v3i2.1065
Yuliawati, L. N., Harmanto, B., Mustikawati, D. A., & Maghfiroh. (2021). Written corrective feedback: Students' perception on online learning. Professional Journal of English Education, 4(6), 1083-1093. http://dx.doi.org/10.22460/project.v4i6.p1083-1093
Zhan, L. (2016). Written teacher feedback: Student perceptions, teacher perceptions, and actual teacher performance. English Language Teaching, 9(8), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n8p73
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v25i2.4659
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 1240 timesPDF view: 587 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) Prema Gupita Sukha, Listyani Listyani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indexed and abstracted in:
LLT Journal Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)
We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 23 No 1, 2020 till Vol 27 No 2, 2024
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.