THE APPLICATION OF SAMR MODEL AND SELF-EFFICACY ON CRITICAL THINKING AND PROCEDURAL KNOWLEDGE

Herlia Alfiana(1*), Hari Karyono(2), Wawan Gunawan(3),

(1) Universitas PGRI Adibuana Surabaya
(2) Universitas PGRI Adibuana Surabaya
(3) Universitas PGRI Adibuana Surabaya
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The use of e-learning presents new challenges for students in terms of improving their critical thinking skills and procedural knowledge in grammar learning. As a result, lecturers need a specific framework while creating an e-learning course. The application of SAMR model is a solution. One of the most dominant traits among students is and self-efficacy. The level of student self-efficacy was controlled in this study to measure the effect of using the SAMR model. This study uses a quasi-experimental design with a factorial design. This study involved 152 students in the experimental and control groups. The research analysis technique was tested using MANOVA. The results and conclusions show that: (1) the SAMR model has a significant effect on students' critical thinking skills and procedural knowledge; (2) self-efficacy significantly affects students' critical thinking skills and procedural knowledge; and (3) a combination of learning models and self-efficacy has a significant effect on procedural knowledge, but does not significantly affect critical thinking skills. This study contributes and improves the quality of e-learning implementation techniques, particularly in the area of English learning.


Keywords


critical thinking, procedural knowledge, SAMR model, self-efficacy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-hamed, H. S. (2019). English learning strategies and their relation to self-efficacy, attitude and language competence among female secondary school students in Buraidah. The International Journal for Research in Education, 43(3), 127–158.

Alfiana, H., Karyono, H., & Gunawan, W. (2021). Analisis butir tes keterampilan berpikir kritis dan pengetahuan prosedural grammar bahasa Inggris. JINOTEP (Jurnal Inovasi Dan Teknologi Pembelajaran), 8(1), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.17977/um031v8i12021p020

Ayu, H. D., Jufriadi, A., Mustika, S. E., Kurniawati, M., Pratiwi, H. Y., Sundaygara, C., & Hudha, M. N. (2021). How to learn oscillation and wave in SAMR framework?. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1869(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012160

Azama, Y. (2015). Effective integration of technology in a high school beginning Japanese class. (Capstone Projects and Master's Theses, California State University.) retrieved from https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes/517

Bai, B., & Wang, J. (2020). The role of growth mindset, self-efficacy and intrinsic value in self-regulated learning and English language learning achievements. Language Teaching Research, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820933190

Bandura, A. (1988). Self-efficacy conception of anxiety. Anxiety Research: An Internation Journal, 1(2), 77–98.

Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived Self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. WH Freeman and Company.

Barquero, V. V., & Arce, N. G. (2020). M-learning : An integrative approach to increase student engagement. Letras, 1, 145–176.

Batiibwe, M. S. K., Bakkabulindi, F. E. K., & Mango, J. M. (2017). The SAMR model valid and reliable for measuring the use of ICT in pedagogy? Answers from a study of teachers of mathematical disciplines in universities in Uganda. International Journal of Computing and ICT Research, 11(1), 11–30.

Bauder, D. K., Cooper, K. M., & Simmons, T. J. (2020). SAMR strategies for the integration of technology through UDL. In S. L. Gronseth & E. M. Dalton (Eds.), Universal access through inclusive instructional design: International perspectives on UDL. Routledge.

Bradley, T. J. (2020). Exploring the effects of an asynchronous professional development with the SAMR integration model on high school teachers’ technology integration in the classroom : An action research study. Scholar Commons (Doctoral Dissertation), 157.

Budiman, A., Rahmawati, R., & Ulfa, R. A. (2018). EFL teacher’s belief and practice on integrating ICT in the classroom: A case study on the implementation of SAMR model in teaching reading descriptive text at MA Assalam, Sukoharjo. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, 19(2), 39–51.

Castro, S. (2018). Google forms quizzes and substitution, augmentation, modification, and redefinition (SAMR) model integration. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 6(2), 4–14.

Chao, C. N. G., McInerney, D. M., & Bai, B. (2018). Self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of language learning achievements in an Asian bilingual context. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(2), 139–147.

Chao, C. N. G., McInerney, D. M., & Bai, B. (2019). Self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of language learning achievements in an Asian bilingual context. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(2), 139–147.

Chen, C. (2020). Effects of the application of webquest to technology education on business management students’ critical thinking psychology and operation capability. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(1), 1–8.

Chen, Y.-T., Liou, S., & Chen, S.-M. (2019). Flipping the procedural knowledge learning-a case study of software learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14.

Chen, Y. (2020). Correlation between self-efficacy and english performance. IJET, 15(8), 1–12.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Fast Facts to Loving your Research Project. Sage Publications.

Cruz, G., Payan-Carreira, R., Dominguez, C., Silva, H., & Morais, F. (2020). What critical thinking skills and dispositions do new graduates need for professional life: Views from Portuguese employers in different fields. Higher Education Research & Development, 1–17.

Dehghani, M., Sani, H. J., Pakmehr, H., & Malekzadeh, A. (2011). Relationship between students’ critical thinking and self-efficacy beliefs in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2952–2955.

Dehghayedi, M. (2020). Predictors of Iranian EFL teachers ’ beliefs about language learning/teaching : Critical thinking , reflectivity and emotional intelligence in focus. Iranian Journal of Learning and Memory, 2(8), 55–71.

Djiwandono, P. I. (2020). How SAMR-based vocabulary teaching shapes vocabulary learning strategies. Teaching English with Technology, 20(4), 41–58.

Dwiono, R., Rochsantiningsih, D., Suparno, S., & others. (2018). Investigating the integration level of information and communication technology (ICT) in the English language teaching. International Journal of Language Teaching and Education, 2(3), 259–274.

Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184.

Fardan, A. (2017). Pengaruh Pembelajaran laju reaksi dengan pendekatan inkuiri-eksplisit reflektif terhadap pengetahuan prosedural, epistemik dan isi di SMA. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Franco, M. (2019). SAMR and technology integration. Power Learning Solutions.

Froemming, C., & Cifuentes, L. (2020). Professional development for technology integration in the early elementary grades. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 433–439.

Fryer, L. K., & Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q. (2017). One more reason to learn a new language: Testing academic self-efficacy transfer at junior high school. Frontline Learning Research, 5(4), 61–75.

Gan, Z., Hu, G., Wang, W., Nang, H., & An, Z. (2020). Feedback behaviour and preference in university academic English courses: Associations with English language self-efficacy. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(5), 740-755. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1810628

Gan, Z., Liu, F., & Yang, C. C. R. (2020). Student-teachers’ self-efficacy for instructing self-regulated learning in the classroom. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(1), 120–123.

Green, L. S. (2014). Through the looking glass examining technology integration. Knowledge Quest, 43(1), 36–43.

Gunawan, W., Degeng, I. N. S., Utaya, S., & Sulton. (2019). The improvement of conceptual and procedural understanding by scaffolding with responsiveness. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 7(5), 162–179.

Gurcay, D., & Ferah, H. O. (2018). High school students’ critical thinking related to their metacognitive self-regulation and physics self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(4), 125.

Hadiwijaya, K., Fiftiyanti, Y., Wulandari, T., Noviasari, E., Rini, I. sulistyo, Ariasti, R. F., Trizuliarti, R., & Ningsih, H. A. (2015). Efikasi diri sebagai moderator hubungan antara harapan akademik, prokrastinasi, dan stres akademik. Management Dinamic Conference.

Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60(5), 433–441.

Handina, Rochintaniawati, D., & Nugraha, I. (2020). Students’ environmental awareness in learning environmental pollution using Instagram-mediated SAMR model. MSCEIS, 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2296342

Handoko, A. G. (2020). The application of the SAMR model in the 12th-grade-English classroom of “s” senior high school. Humanising Language Teaching, 22(4).

Harmandaoğlu Baz, E., Balçıkanlı, C., & Cephe, P. T. (2018). Introducing an innovative technology integration model: Echoes from EFL pre-service teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 2179–2200.

Howlett, K. M., Allred, J., Beck, D., & Mysore, A. R. (2019). An English learner service-learning project: Preparing education majors using technology and the SAMR model. Call-Ej, 20(2), 128–149.

Indratno, H. D. G. (2017). Implementing SAMR model in language learning. The 5 Celt International Conference Proceeding: Contextualizing the Trajectory of Language and Arts in Contemporary Society, 9, 154.

Indrawati, F. A., Wardono, W., & Junaedi, I. (2020). Mathematics literacy ability in terms of self efficacy in cooperative learning type of group investigation model with humanism approach assisted by schoology. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 11(1), 83–93.

Izza, A., & Rusydiyah, E. F. (2020). Analisis model SAMR pada guru pendidikan agama Islam dalam mengembangkan motivasi belajar siswa. Edureligia: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 04(01), 11–34.

Jati, A. G. (2018). The use of smartphone applications in English language teaching and learning. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 17(1), 144–153.

Kihoza, P., Zlotnikova, I., Bada, J., & Kalegele, K. (2016). Classroom ICT integration in Tanzania: Opportunities and challenges from the perspectives of TPACK and SAMR models. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 12(1), 107–128.

Kriek, J., Dega, B. G., Ayene, M., & Coetzee, A. (2016). A modified model of TPACK and SAMR in teaching for understanding. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 23–28.

Leavy, P. (2017). Research design quantitative, qualitative, art-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. The Guilford Press.

Lievens, J. (2018). Teaching and learning writing skills in a technological age: A selective mapping of writing apps onto a structured model of the writing process. EDULEARN18 Proceedings, 1, 1152–1159.

Listiani, W. O., Kadir, K., & Ruslan, R. (2019). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematik dan self-efficacy siswa sekolah menengah atas dengan model pembelajaran berbasis masalah kontekstual. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 67–77.

Lobo, A. G., & Jiménez, R. L. (2017). Evaluating basic grammar projects using the SAMR model. Letras, 1(61), 123.

Martin, T. J. (2020). The effect of teacher perceptions and self-efficacy for technology with the use of the SAMR model. Wingate University.

Muhammad, R., Wahyuni, L., Syahman, & Juwida, H. (2020). Melatih kemampuan berpikir kritis, ketrampilan komunikasi dan self efficacy siswa menggunakan model scientific critical thinking ( SCT ). Paedagoria: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kependidikan, 11(1), 93–99.

Mukhalafatun, S., & Hanan, H. (2020). Studi eksploratif dampak pandemi Covid-19 terhadap proses pembelajaran e-learning di perguruan tinggi. UrbanGreen Conference Proceeding Library, 1, 78–83.

Nakapan, W. (2016). Using the SAMR model to transform mobile learning in a history of art and architecture classroom. 2015, 809–818.

Nuraeni, S. (2019). Hubungan self-efficacy dengan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa pada materi kesetimbangan kimia. Jakarta: FITK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Nurazizah, S., & Nurjaman, A. (2018). Analisis hubungan self efficacy terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa pada materi lingkaran. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 1(3), 361–370.

Peers, C., Issartel, J., Behan, S., O’Connor, N., & Belton, S. (2020). Movement competence: Association with physical self-efficacy and physical activity. Human Movement Science, 70, 102582.

Pfaffe, L. D. (2017). Using the SAMR model as a framework for evaluating m-learning activities and supporting a transformation of learning. St. John’s University (New York).

Pirttimaa, M., Husu, J., & Metsärinne, M. (2017). Uncovering procedural knowledge in craft, design, and technology education: A case of hands-on activities in electronics. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(2), 215–231.

Psaradakis, Z., & Vávra, M. (2020). Normality tests for dependent data: Large-sample and bootstrap approaches. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 49(2), 283–304.

Retnaningsih, R. (2020). E-learning system sebuah solusi pragmatis program vokasional semasa pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Taman Vokasi, 8(1), 21–26.

Rohatgi, A., Scherer, R., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2016). The role of ICT self-efficacy for students’ ICT use and their achievement in a computer and information literacy test. Computers and Education, 102, 103–116.

Rokhmawan, T. (2018). Konteks, tema, skemata, memori, dan pikiran: Mendukung pembelajaran bahasa sebagai penghela ilmu pengetahuan. Hasta Wiyata, 1(2), 12–29.

Sağlam, D., & Arslan, A. (2018). The development of English language skills self-efficacy scale for higher education students. International Journal of Psycho-Educational Sciences, 7(2), 1–15.

Saputro, A. D., Atun, S., Wilujeng, I., Ariyanto, A., & Arifin, S. (2020). Enhancing pre-service elementary teachers’ self-efficacy and critical thinking using problem-based learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 765–773.

Sardegna, V. G., Lee, J., & Kusey, C. (2018). Self-efficacy, attitudes, and choice of strategies for english pronunciation learning. Language Learning, 68(1), 83–114.

Schweder, S. (2019). The role of control strategies, self-efficacy, and learning behavior in self-directed learning. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 7(sup1), 29–41.

Shiau, W.-L., Yuan, Y., Pu, X., Ray, S., & Chen, C. C. (2020). Understanding fintech continuance: Perspectives from self-efficacy and ECT-IS theories. Industrial Management & Data Systems.

Shouman, D., & Momdjian, L. (2019). Deeper learning versus surface learning: The SAMR model to assess e-learning pedagogy. International Conference on Digital Economy, 230–238.

Siburian, J., Corebima, A. D., Ibrohim, & Saptasari, M. (2019). The correlation between critical and creative thinking skills on cognitive learning results. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2019(81), 99–114.

Sockalingam, N., & Liu, J. (2020). Designing learning experiences for online teaching and learning. May, 1–7.

Sun, T., & Wang, C. (2020). College students’ writing self-efficacy and writing self-regulated learning strategies in learning English as a foreign language. System, 90, 102221.

Syawaludin, A., Gunarhadi, & Rintayati, P. (2019). Development of augmented reality-based interactive multimedia to improve critical thinking skills in science learning. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 331–344.

Tan, R., Polong, R., Collates, L., & Torres, J. (2020). Influence of small group discussion on the English oral communication self-efficacy of Filipino ESL learners in Central Luzon. TESOL International Journal, 15(1), 100–106.

Teng, L. S., Sun, P. P., & Xu, L. (2018). Conceptualizing writing self-efficacy in English as a foreign language contexts: Scale validation through structural equation modeling. TESOL Quarterly, 52(4), 911–942.

Tunjera, N., & Chigona, A. (2020). Teacher educators’ appropriation of TPACK-SAMR models for 21st century pre-service teacher preparation. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 16(3), 1–15.

Utami, F. D., Djatmika, E. T., & Sa’dijah, C. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran terhadap pemahaman konsep, sikap ilmiah, dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis ditinjau dari motivasi belajar siswa kelas IV. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(12), 1629–1638.

Vattøy, K. D. (2020). Teachers’ beliefs about feedback practice as related to student self-regulation, self-efficacy, and language skills in teaching english as a foreign language. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64(October 2019), 100828.

Wahyuni, S., Mujiyanto, J., Fitiyati, S. W., & Rukmini, D. (2019). Teachers’ technology integration into english instructions : SAMR model. 443(Iset 2019), 546–550.

Warsen, G. D., & Vandermolen, R. M. (2020). When technology works: A case study using instructional rounds and the SAMR model. Education Leadership, 21(1), 163.

Wechsler, S. M., Saiz, C., Rivas, S. F., Vendramini, C. M. M., Almeida, L. S., Mundim, M. C., & Franco, A. (2018). Creative and critical thinking: Independent or overlapping components?. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 114–122.

Widiasari, N. K. R., & Sumantri, M. (2020). Kooperatif tipe group investigation melalui setting lesson study terhadap kompetensi pengetahuan IPA. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 4(2), 143–152.

Wills, T., & Baker, C. (2018). Engaging students with synchronous online learning activities. Innovations in Teaching & Learning Conference Proceedings, 10.

Wills, T., & Baker, C. (2017). Strategies to make online teaching better than face-to-face. Innovations in Teaching & Learning Conference Proceedings, 9.

Wilson, K., & Narayan, A. (2016). Relationships among individual task self-efficacy, self-regulated learning strategy use and academic performance in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 236–253.

Wuryaningrum, R., Bektiarso, S., & Suyitno, I. (2020). The effects of knowledge-transforming text on elementary students’ declarative, procedural knowledge, and motivation in environmental learning. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 567–586.

Yap, B. W., & Sim, C. H. (2011). Comparisons of various types of normality tests. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 81(12), 2141–2155.

Zainal, M. (2020). Integrasi model SAMR (subtitution, augmentation, modification, and redefinition) pada diklat jarak jauh balai diklat keagamaan Makassar. Jurnal Widyaiswara Indonesia, 1(3), 155–163.

Zhai, X., Zhang, M., Li, M., & Zhang, X. (2019). Understanding the relationship between levels of mobile technology use in high school physics classrooms and the learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 750–766.

Zhang, D., Wang, M., & Wu, J. G. (2020). Design and implementation of augmented reality for English language education. In Augmented Reality in Education (pp. 217–234). Springer.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Goal setting: A key proactive source of academic self-regulation. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Zulnaidi, H., & Zakaria, E. (2012). The effect of using GeoGebra on conceptual and procedural knowledge of high school mathematics students. Asian Social Science, 8(11), 102–106.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v25i1.3893

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Herlia Alfiana, Hari Karyono, Wawan Gunawan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed and abstracted in:

     

 

 

LLT Journal Sinta 1 Certificate (S1 = Level 1)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 1 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 169/E/KPT/2024. Validity for 5 years: Vol ... No 1, 20... till Vol ... No 2, 20...


Sinta 1 certificate to post here asap. Thank you for your patience and understanding. 

 

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.