Content Validity and Authenticity of the 2012 English Test in the Senior High School National Examination

Frisca Ayu Desi Widyaningrum(1*), Carla Sih Prabandari(2),

(1) Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta
(2) Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This paper discusses content validity and authenticity of the English testitems in National Examination (UN) year 2012. It is worth discussion because UN,which was administered nationally, was the most important standardized test toassess Indonesian students competence. The study aimed to find out how valid thecontent of the English test items of National Examination year 2012 for senior highschools isand how authentic the English test items of National Examination year2012 for senior high schools is. The writers employed a qualitative research withdocument analysis to conduct the analysis of both content validity and authenticityof the English test items. The data were obtained from the document and analyzedby using checklists. Besides, to maintain the validitiy of the analysis, a triagulationwas done by distributing aquestionnaire to four experts in language assessment.There were twofindings resulted form the analysis. First, the content of the NationalExamination year 2012 was 98.8% valid since almost all of the contents wererelevant to the test specifications. However, there were three reading test versionswhich failed to represent kinds of texts, namely explanation text. Second, theNational Examination year 2012 met the criteria of authenticity with percentage79.5% since some listening and reading test items failed to conform to authenticitycriteria. Natural language use, the relevance of the test topics, and real-worldrepresentativeness became problematic aspects to meet the higher standard ofauthenticity.

Full Text:

PDF

References


American Psychological Association. (1954). Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques: Preliminary proposal.

American Psychologist, 7, 461-476.

American Psychological Association.(1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996).Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Fraenkel, J. R., &Wallen, N. E. (2008). How to design and evaluate research in education (7thed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Gronlund, N. (1998). Assessment of student achievement (6thed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn& Bacon.

Jandaghi, G., &Shateria, F. (2008).Rate of validity, reliability and difficulty

indices for teacher-designed exam questions in first year high school.

International Journal of Human Sciences [Online]. 5:2. Retrieved

September 19, 2013 from http://www.insanbilimleri.com

McNamara, T. (2000). Language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary (7thed). (2005). Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional No. 22 tahun 2006 tentang Ujian Nasional.

Peraturan Menteri No. 59 tahun 2011 tentang Ujian Nasional.

Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Seif, A. A. (2004). Assessment and Evaluation in Education. Tehran: Doran Publication. Retrieved September 19, 2013 from

http://www.insanbilimleri.com

Tempo Interactive. (June, 2012). National exams warrant re-evaluation. Tempo. Retrieved on August 31, 2012, from http://www.tempo.co/read/

news/2012/06/.../055409165

Anggrita Desyani. (September, 2012). Rencana variasi 20 soal ujian nasional dikritik.Tempo. Retrieved on September 19, 2013, from

h t t p : / / w w w . t e m p o . c o / r e a d /news/2012/09/11/079428853/Rencana-Variasi-20-Soal-Ujian-

Nasional-Dikritik

Widdowson, H. G. (1976). The authenticity of language data. In John F. Fanselow & Ruth H. Crymes (Eds.), TESOL 76 (pp. 261-270). Washington, D.C.: TESOL.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v16i1.279

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Frisca Ayu Desi Widyaningrum, Carla Sih Prabandari



Indexed by:

LLT Scopus   LLT Scopus   LLT DOAJ

LLT Google Scholar  LLT' Crossref   LLT Garuda  LLT Sinta

LLT ROAD  LLT DimensionsAltruis' BASE  LLT WorldCat

 

LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching Sinta 1 Certificate

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License