Email this article FACE THREATENING ACTS (FTAs) IN AIPAC POLITICAL ANNUAL SPEECHES BETWEEN 2006 AND 2012
Abstract
Face Threatening Acts are politeness forms which have been struggled over in the past and now as they are pragmatically deemed relevant in identifying centripetal and centrifugal movements exerted by political actors on their interlocutors. The findings on approaching political discourse from politeness perspective have been controversial and ranged from being confined to the interactional level to negotiating implicit power relations.This present study offers a politeness theoretical framework to examine AIPAC political annual speeches between 2006 and 2012. The target of this research is to understand which politeness strategies political actors deploy when addressing the audience and how these political speakers please the other and fulfill political ends. The results display an over-reliance on Face Threatening Acts on record with redressive action at the expense of Face Threatening Acts on record without redressive action and Face Threatening Acts off record. Positive politeness, notably expressive speech acts, play an inclusive role, gain the audience sympathy and reshape public opinion. The study fills the gap in the study of the impact of positive politeness on political discourse and calls for the consideration of expressive speech acts as means of power negotiation rather than mere interaction.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abudayeh, H. & Dubbati, B. (2010). Politeness Strategies in Translating Donald Trump’s Offensive Language into Arabic. Perspectives. Taylor & Francis online.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676x.2019.1709514.
Ardila, G. (2019). Impoliteness as a Rhetorical Strategy in Spain’s Politics. Journal of Pragmatics. 140. 160-170.
Are, L. T. (1994). Israeli Peace / Palestinian Justice: Liberation Theology and the Peace Process. Atlanta, GA: Clarity Press.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: University Press.
Brown, R. & Levinson, C. S. (1987). Politeness in some Universals in Language Usage. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Chilton, P. (2004). Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Culpeper, J. (2011). Politeness and Impoliteness. In G. Andersen, & K. Aijmer (EDs). Pragmatics of Society (pp.393-438). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Elazar, J. D. (1976). Community and Policy: The Organizational Dynamics of American Jewry. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society of America.
Felton, G. (2010). The Host and the Parasite: How Israel’s Fifth Column Consumed America. United States:Bad Bear Press.
Findley, P. (2003). They Dare to Speak out: People and Institutions Confront Israel’s Lobby.Chicago:Lawrence Hill Books.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
Hamno, A. (2020). President Trump’s use of ‘Impoliteness Strategies’ in Twitter outputs targeted at U.S. politicians (from 15 June 2015, to 24 May 2019). Digital a Vetenskapliga Arkivet. DIVA.org:unu-167748.
Hart, A. (2010). Zionism, the Red Enemy of the Jews: Conflict Without End? Atlanta, GA: Clarity Press, Inc.
Kadar, D. & Zhang, S. (2019). Alignment, ‘Politeness’ and Implicitness in Chinese political discourse: a case study of the 2018 vaccine scandal. Language and Politics, 18(5).
Kampf, Z. (2013). Mediated performatives. In Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics. 1(24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kampf. Z. (2015). Political discourse analysis. In Karen Tracy, Todd Sandel & Cornellia Ilie (Eds). International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. 1160-1175. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Kampf, Z. & Danziger, R. (2019). You dribble faster than Messi and jump higher than Jordan: the art of complimenting and praising in political discourse. Politeness Research 15 (1). 1-23.
Kuntarto, E., Siswoyo, M. & Kusmana, S. (2019). Language style of opposition politician group in Indonesia: critical discourse analysis. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2991/isseh-18.2019.33.
Lakoff, T. R. & Ide, S. (2005). Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Locher, M. A. & Watts, J. R. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research. 1(1), 9-33.
Livnat, Z. & Lewin, B. (2016). The interpersonal strand of political speech: recruiting the audience in PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s speeches. Language and Dialogue. 6(2), 275-305.
Mac Donald, B. K. (2007). Cultural Insurrections: Essays on Western Civilization, Jewish Influence, and Anti – Semitism. Atlanta, GA: Occidental Press.
Mearsheimer, J. J., and Walt, S. M. (2007). The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
O’Driscoll, J. (2007). Brown and Levinson’s Face: how it can – and can’t – help us to understand interaction across cultures. Intercultural Pragmatics. 4 (4). 463-492.
Petras, J. (2008). Zionism, Militarism and the Decline of U.S. Power. Atlanta, GA: Clarity Press.
Raimondo, J. (2003). The Terror Enigma: 9/11 and the Israeli Connection. Lincoln: iUniverse.com
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sniegoski, J. S. (2008). The Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative Agenda, War in the Middle East, And the National Interest of Israel. Chicago: IHS Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is Political Discourse Analysis. In J. Blommaert and C. Bulcean (Eds.), Political Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Weber, J. P. & Jones, L. W. (1994). U.S. Religious Interest Groups: Institutional Profiles. Westport, com: Greenwood Press.
Wilson III, J. E. (2004). Diversity and U.S. Foreign Policy: A Reader. New York and London: Routledge.
Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (Second Edition). London, Los Angeles, New Delhi, Singapore and Washington, DC: SAGE.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v24i1.2684
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 2088 timesPDF view: 727 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Tarak Dridi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indexed and abstracted in:
LLT Journal Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)
We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 23 No 1, 2020 till Vol 27 No 2, 2024
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.