PAIRED ORAL TESTS: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Hardi Prasetyo(1*),

(1) Department of English, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This paper reviews the studies on paired oral tests in the last ten years (2007-2017). Using the search facilities in Iowa State Universitys library, nine articles from some journals in the field of applied linguistics were chosen based on the inclusion criteria. Those journals are Language Testing, Language Assessment Quarterly, Applied Linguistics, and Procedia Social and Behavioral Science. Three reasons why paired oral tests are better than interview test or individual format test are then discussed. Those are promoting and improving students interactional competence, creating students co-constructed discourse, and providing insights for better scale development and rater training. Paired oral tests provide opportunities for students to interact with peers in the tests, enable them to practice and improve their interactional competence. Paired oral tests also enable students to co-construct their discourse, even though there is an issue of grading the scores individually or collaboratively. The last is, more information about students and raters perception were gained that helps improve the rating scale and inform rater training. This paper is concluded with the call for more studies on paired oral tests to provide more insights into this complex process of creating co-constructed discourse and how to validly and reliably test both its process and product.

Keywords


pair oral test, interactional competence, co-constructed discourse

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bennett, R. (2012). Is linguistic ability variation in paired oral language testing problematic? ELT Journal, 66(3), 337346. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr066

Brooks, L. (2009). Interacting in pairs in a test of oral proficiency: Co-constructing a better performance. Language Testing, 26(3), 341366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104666

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th Ed.). London: SAGE Publications.

Davis, L. (2009). The influence of interlocutor proficiency in a paired oral assessment. Language Testing, 26(3), 367396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104667

Ducasse, A. M., & Brown, A. (2009). Assessing paired orals: Raters orientation to interaction. Language Testing, 26(3), 423443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104669

Galaczi, E. D. (2008). Peerpeer interaction in a speaking test: The case of the First Certificate in English examination. Language Assessment Quarterly, 5(2), 89119. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300801934702

Galaczi, E. D. (2014). Interactional competence across proficiency levels: How do learners manage interaction in paired speaking tests? Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 553574. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt017

Kramsch, C. (1986). From language proficiency to interactional competence. The Modern Language Journal, 70(4), 366372. https://doi.org/10.2307/326815

Laborda, J. G., Juan, N. O. de, & Bakieva, M. (2015). Co-participation in oral paired Interviews: Preliminary findings of the OPENPAU project. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 559563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.614

Lazaraton, A., & Davis, L. (2008). A microanalytic perspective on discourse, proficiency, and identity in paired oral assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 5(4), 313335. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300802457513

May, L. (2009). Co-constructed interaction in a paired speaking test: The raters perspective. Language Testing, 26(3), 397421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104668

Ockey, G. J., & Li, Z. (2015). New and not so new methods for assessing oral communication. Language Value, 7(1), 121. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.6035/LanguageV.2015.7.1




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v21iSuppl.1220

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Hardi Prasetyo



Indexed and abstracted in:

     

 

 

LLT Journal Sinta 1 Certificate (S1 = Level 1)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 1 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 169/E/KPT/2024. Validity for 5 years: Vol ... No 1, 20... till Vol ... No 2, 20...


Sinta 1 certificate to post here asap. Thank you for your patience and understanding. 

 

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.