NEW INSIGHTS INTO PEER FEEDBACK IN VIRTUAL LANGUAGE EXCHANGES

Montserrat Iglesias(1*), Cristina Tarazona(2),

(1) CETT Barcelona School of Tourism, Hospitality and Gastronomy, University of Barcelona, Spain
(2) Oxford College of Emory University, USA
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


To foster the acquisition of English or Spanish as a foreign language, 26 undergraduate students took part in a synchronous virtual language exchange between Oxford College of Emory University (United States) and CETT Barcelona School of Tourism, Hospitality and Gastronomy (affiliated with the University of Barcelona, Spain). After each conversation, participants had to fill in a 5-item questionnaire and comment on their language partner’s performance. Individual feedback was gathered by means of Google Forms and referred to overall oral performance, specific grammar and vocabulary errors, specific pronunciation errors, improvement suggestions for enhanced communication, and remarkable conversation features. To explore the main characteristics and components of peer feedback in this virtual context, the comments provided by the participants were analysed through content analysis and categorization using the qualitative data analysis software QDA Miner Lite. The results show that the participants made constructive recommendations and comments that supported the development of their communicative competences and intercultural skills. In practical terms, the specific strengths and weaknesses pointed out in the questionnaires can be used as formative indicators by students and instructors. This small-scale study aligns with previous research indicating that peer feedback as an integrated element in virtual language exchanges contributes to linguistic awareness and progress among undergraduate foreign language learners.


Keywords


communicative competence, foreign language acquisition, intercultural competence, online exchange, peer feedback

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahangari, S., Rassekh-Alqol, B., & Hamed, L. A. A. (2013). The effect of peer assessment on oral presentation in an EFL context. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 2(3), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.2n.3p.45

Al Khateeb, A., & Hassan, M. (2022). Peer feedback among learners of English and Arabic as a foreign language in a telecollaborative language learning program. The JALT CALL Journal, 18(2), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v18n2.479

Allen, D., & Mills, A. (2016). The impact of second language proficiency in dyadic peer feedback. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 498–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814561902

Aranha, S., & Cavalari, S. (2015). Institutional integrated Teletandem: What have we been learning about writing and peer feedback? DELTA, 31(3), 763–780. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-445039175922916369

Carr N., & Wicking P. (2022). Learning outcomes generated through the collaborative processing of expert peer feedback. Journal of Language and Education, 8(4), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.13425

Castillo-Scott, A. (2015). Pan-American Teletandem language exchange project. The EUROCALL Review, 23(1), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2015.4661

Chang, C.-F. (2012). Peer review via three modes in an EFL writing course. Computers and Composition, 29(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2012.01.001

Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2005). Peer assessment of language proficiency. Language Testing, 22(1), 93–121. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532205lt298oa

Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Culubret, C., González, A., Iglesias, M., Moreno, S., & Roigé, V. (2022). Academic tourism in Barcelona (Spain) in the COVID-19 era. REGION, 9(2), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.18335/region.v9i2.410

Ennis, M. J., Verzella, M., Montanari, S., Sendur, A. M., Simeonova Pissarro, M., Kaiser, S., & Wimhurst, A. (2021). A telecollaboration project on giving online peer feedback: Implementing a multilateral virtual exchange during a pandemic. Journal of Language & Education, 7(4), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.17323/JLE.2021.11914

Fukuda, S. T., Lander, B. W., & Pope, C. J. (2024). Exploring student engagement with formative assessment and ICT tools. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 27(2), 911-930. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v27i2.9092

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2019). Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547.003

Iglesias, M. (2013). Practical implications of a constructivist approach to EFL teaching in a higher education context. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 10(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.14453/jutlp.v10i2.3

Iglesias, M., & Tarazona, C. (2022). Pedagogic innovation and peer feedback in the foreign language classroom. Paper presented at UICELL Conference Proceedings 2022 (pp. 271–279). Jakarta: University of Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA (UHAMKA). https://journal.uhamka.ac.id/uicell/article/view/11045

Iglesias, M., & Tarazona, C. (2023). Second language acquisition and cross-cultural awareness using flipgrid in higher education. REFLections, 30(3), 647–670. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v30i3.267906

Iswandari, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2020). Peer feedback in college EFL writing: A review of empirical research. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 23(2), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v23i2.2799

Jonassen, D. H. (2003). Learning to solve problems: An instructional design guide. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

O’Dowd, R. (2018). From telecollaboration to virtual exchange: State-of-the-art and the role of UNICollaboration in moving forward. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 1(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.jve.1

Patri, M. (2002). The influence of peer feedback on self-and peer-assessment of oral skills. Language testing, 19(2), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt224oa

Payant, C., & Zuniga, M. (2022). Learners' flow experience during peer revision in a virtual writing course during the global pandemic. System, 105, 102715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102715

Price, M., O’Donovan, B., & Rust, C. (2007). Putting a social‐constructivist assessment process model into practice: Building the feedback loop into the assessment process through peer review. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701241059

Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism, instructional design, and technology: Implications for transforming distance learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 3(2), 50–60.

Thurlings, M., Vermeulen, M., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2013). Understanding feedback: A learning theory perspective. Educational Research Review, 9, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.11.004

Vo, T., & Nguyen, N. (2023). Students’ perceptions towards the application of peer assessment in a virtual English writing class. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(2), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.53761/ 1.20.02.05

Ware, P., & O’Dowd, R. (2008). Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration. Language Learning and Technology, 12(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10125/44130

Yeh, H. C., & Heng, L. (2022). Creating a virtual “third space” in a telecollaborative project to promote English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ language proficiency and intercultural awareness. Interactive Learning Environment, 31(10), 6667-6677. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2043384

Zhang, H., Song, W., Shen, S., & Huang, R. (2014). The effects of blog-mediated peer feedback on learners’ motivation, collaboration, and course satisfaction in a second language writing course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(6), 670-685. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.860




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v28i1.10642

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Montserrat Iglesias, Cristina Tarazona

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed and abstracted in:

     

 

 

LLT Journal Sinta 1 Certificate (S1 = Level 1)
We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 1 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 10/C/C 3/DT.05.00/2025. Validity for 5 years: Vol 26 No 2 2023 till Vol 31 No 1 2028.

Sinta 1 certificate to post here asap. Thank you for your patience and understanding. 

 

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.