GENDER DIFFERENCES AND THE USE OF METADISCOURSE MARKERS IN WRITING ESSAYS

Truly Almendo Pasaribu(1*),

(1) Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims at investigating metadiscourse markers in academic essays written by male and female students. With the goal in mind, 20 essays written by EFL female students and 20 essays written by EFL male students were chosen. These data were analyzed based on the metadiscourse framework proposed by Hyland (2005). The findings revealed that both male and female writers employed more interactive markers than interactional markers due to the fact that both genders inserted transition markers frequently to guide readers through the texts. However, a cultural factor may influence the writers tendency not to use transition markers showing arguments. Furthermore, although male students employed more interactional markers, female students used more markers in interactional sub-categories except self-mentions. Although it is assumed that women prefer to use a more personalized style, male writers in this study also personalized their essays by using self-mentions. One possible reason was that the use of these features tended to be more field-specific than gender-specific. The findings and discussion indicated that gender is not the only factor influencing the use of metadiscourse markers. Other possible variables discussed in this study should be taken into account.

Keywords


metadiscourse, gender, discourse

Full Text:

PDF

References


D'angelo, L. (2008). Gender identity and authority in academic book reviews: An analysis of meta discourse across disciplines. Linguistica e Filologia, 27, 205-221.

Dardjowidjojo, S. (2006). The implementability of Western approaches in Eastern societies. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1), 1-20.

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 12321248.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and womans place. New York: Harper Colophon.

Lodico M. G., Spaulding D. T. & Voegtle K. H. (2006). Methods in educational research: From theory to practice. New York: Wiley.

Matei, M. (2011). The influence of age and gender on the selection of discourse markers in casual conversations. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Bra?ov. Series IV: Philology and Cultural Studies, 4(53), 213-220.

Pasaribu, T. A. (2017) Male and female students use of textual discourse markers in writing academic essays. Journal of Language and Literature, 17(1).

Serholt, S. (2012). Hedges and boosters in academic writing: A study of gender differences in essays written by Swedish advanced learners of English. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2077/29526

Seyyedrezaie, Z. S. & Vahedi, V. S. (2017). Projecting gender identity through metadiscourse marking: Investigating writers stance taking in written discourse. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 301-310.

Shirzad & Jamali. (2013). Gender differences in EFL academic writing. New York: Lambert Publishing.

Subon, F. (2013) Gender differences in the use of linguistic forms in the speech of men and women in the Malaysian context. IOSR Journal of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS),13(3), 67-79.

Tse, P. & Hyland, K. (2008). Robot Kung fu: Gender and professional identity in biology and philosophy reviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(7), 1232-124.

Wahab, A. (2006). Isu linguistik: Pengajaran bahasa dan sastra. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.

Waskita, D. (2008). Differences in mens and womens ESL academic writing at the University of Melbourne. Jurnal Socioteknologi, 7(14).

Yeganeh, M. T. & Ghoreyshi, S. M. (2015). Exploring gender differences in the use of discourse markers in Iranian academic research articles. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science, 192, 684 689.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v1i1.683

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Truly Almendo Pasaribu




Indexed and abstracted in:

 

         

 

IJHS Sinta 3 Certificate (S3 = Level 3)

International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) has been nationally accredited Sinta 3 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 4 No 1, 2020 till Vol 8 No 2, 2024

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

p-ISSN: 2597-470X (since 31 August 2017); e-ISSN: 2597-4718 (since 31 August 2017)

Flag Counter

Notice: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the editorial team or publishers.

International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) is a scientific journal in English published twice a year, namely in September and March, by Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.