PRAGMATIC PHENOMENA CONSTELLATION IN SPECIFIC CULTURE DIMENSION LANGUAGE STUDY

R Kunjana Rahardi(1*),

(1) Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The linguistic phenomena studied in pragmatics evolve over time. Among the pragmatic phenomena that can be mentioned here are: implicature, deixis, presupposition, entailment, language politeness, language impoliteness and language phatic. There are certainly other pragmatic phenomena outside the phenomena mentioned above. In the future, other new pragmatic phenomena are expected to arise, along with the better development of pragmatic studies. Among those pragmatic phenomena, the phenomenon of language impoliteness can be regarded as a new phenomenon. How the constellation of pragmatic phenomena in the language study with the specific culture perspective becomes the main issue discussed in this short article. The benefit obtained by understanding the constellation of this new pragmatic phenomenon is that the interpretation of the pragmatic intent or meaning of language impoliteness becomes increasingly sharp, profound and comprehensive because its association with other pragmatic phenomena is sometimes an inevitable fact.


Keywords


phatic language, linguistic impoliteness, pragmatic phenomenon, specific culture

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anonymous. (1993). Prinsip-prinsip pragmati. (M.D.D. Oka & Setyadi Setyapranata, Trans.). Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.

Allan, K. (1986). Linguistic meaning. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul Inc.

Blum-Kulka, S. (1987). Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different? Journal of Pragmatics 11, 131-146.

Bousfiled, D. & Miriam A. L. (Eds.). (2008). Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Culpeper, J. (2008). Reflections in impoliteness, relational work and power. In Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. New York. Mouton de Gruyter.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. New York: Academic Press.

Grundy, P. (2000). Doing pracmatics. London: Arnolod.

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. London: Cambridge University Press.

Locher, M. A. & Derek, B. (2008). Impoliteness and power in language. In Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. New York. Mouton de Gruyter.

Mahsun. (2005). Metode penulisan bahasa: Tahapan strategi, metode, dan tekniknya. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Mey, J. L. (1994). Pragmatics: An Introduction. Massachusetts: Basil Blackwell Inc.

Morris, C.W. (1938). Foundations of the theory of Signs. In O. Neurah, R. Carnap and C. Morris (Eds.), International encyclopedia of united science. Chicago: University of chacago Press.

Nadar, F. X. (2009). Pragmatik dan penelitian pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Parker, F. (1986). Linguistics for non linguists. London: Taylor and Francis Ltd.

Rahardi, K. (2004). Berkenalan dengan ilmu bahasa pragmatik. Malang: Dioma.

Rahardi, K. (2006). Pragmatik: Kesantunan imperatif bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.

Stalnaker, R. C. (1973). Pragmatic presupposition. In Munitz, M.K. and D.K. Unger (Eds.), Semantics and Philosophy. New York: New York UniversityPress.

Terkourafi, M. (2008). Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness, and rudeness. In Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatics failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91112.

Verschueren, J. Understanding pragmatics. London: Arnold.

Watts, R. J. & Miriam, A. L. (2008). Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistics behavior. In Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Watts, R. J., Sachiko, I. & Konrad, E. (2005). Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v1i1.677

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 R Kunjana Rahardi




Indexed and abstracted in:

 

         

 

IJHS Sinta 3 Certificate (S3 = Level 3)

International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) has been nationally accredited Sinta 3 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 4 No 1, 2020 till Vol 8 No 2, 2024

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

p-ISSN: 2597-470X (since 31 August 2017); e-ISSN: 2597-4718 (since 31 August 2017)

Flag Counter

Notice: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the editorial team or publishers.

International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) is a scientific journal in English published twice a year, namely in September and March, by Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.