Email this article 
SHE THINKS, HE SAYS: THE VOICE OF THE OTHER IN NOBEL LAUREATES’ GENDERED LITERATURE
(1) Mindanao State University and Silliman University, Philippines
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The gendered language system is often used in literary works to present distinct character perspectives however, the issue of representation is accentuated when a writer presents a perspective of a different gender. Kawabata Yasunari and Gabriel Garcia Marquez who depicted female perspectives in their stories, have to face the issue of reliability of representation: theirs is argued asa patriarchal perception of a female’s perspective. Employing Spivak’s argument in Can the Subaltern Speak?, this paper positioned her statement as “through the perspective of the West (men), subaltern (women) become/s dependent on them (men) to speak for their condition rather than allowing them to speak for themselves.” This paper discussed the gendered language by examining the characters’ uncertain finitude utilizing Asher-Greve’s established gender markers to identify gender associations. Withthe stories of the two Nobel Laureates, this paper has established that through exploring the narrators’ usage of gendered language, both writers have inadvertently revealed their own male biases. The narrators of both writers turned out to be the voice of the other not because they have truthfully and successfully spoken for the marginalized; instead, they have become estranged voices of the subjects they are supposed to represent.Hence, the voices that cry for connection and understanding.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Asher-Greve, J. M. (2002). The essential body: Mesopotamian conceptions of the gendered body. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0424.00070
Beauvoir, S.D. (2010). The second sex (C. Borde and S. Malovany-Chevallier, Trans.). London, UK: Vintage
BoroditskyL. (2009). How does our language shape the way we think? In M. Brockman (Ed.), What's next? Dispatches on the future of science (pp. 116–129). New York: Vintage.
Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L. A., & Phillips, W. (2003). Sex, syntax, and semantics. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Cognition (pp. 61–79). Cambridge: MIT. https://web.stanford.edu/class/linguist156/Boroditsky_ea_2003.pdf
Brownmiller, S. (1984). Femininity (pp. 88-89). New York: Linden Press/Simon & Schuster
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. London: Routledge
Crawford, M. (1995). Talking difference: On gender and language. New York: Sage Publications
Doğan, T. E. T. (2018). Gendered language versus genderless language: Translational challenges in Emma Donoghue's room. In A. Ö. Tarakçioğlu, K. U. İşisağ, & N. Tekin (Eds.). From Diversity to Synergy: New Perspectives in English Literature, Linguistics and Translation Studies. Beau Basiing: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328784427_Gendered_Language_versus_Genderless_Language_Translational_Challenges_in_Emma_Donoghue's_Room
Eckert, P. & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791147
Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. TACD Journal, 17(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046171X.1989.12034344
Gramsci, A. (1971). Prison notebooks (pp.131-161). Retrieved on February 12,
2021, from https://uberty.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/gramsci-prison-notebooks.pdf
Jakobson, R. (1959). On linguistic aspect of translation. On Translation, p 232-239. Boston: Harvard University Press. Retrieved on January 16, 2021,
from https://web.stanford.edu/~eckert/PDF/jakobson.pdf
Lange, C. (2008). Men and women writing women: The female perspective and feminism in U.S. novels and African novels in French by male and female authors. UW-L Journal of Undergraduate Research XI. Retrieved on
May 16, 2021, from https://www.wmmsk.com/media/LibraryWomen.pdf
Loland, H. (2010). Gendered God-language in second Isaiah. Retrieved on
December 16, 2020, from https://www.academia.edu/4210083/_Gendered_God_Language_in_Second_Isaiah_?auto=download
Mills, S. & Mullany, L. (2011). Language, gender and feminism. theory, methodology and practice. New York: Routlegde. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814666
Moosavi, M., Ghandeharion, A. & Sabbagh, M.R.G. (2019). Gendered narrative in female war literature: Helen benedict’s sand queen. Journal of Women of the Middle East and the Islamic World 18, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1163/15692086-12341365
Morton, S. (2003). Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (p. 63). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444337839.wbelctv2s010
Newman, T. (2021). Sex and gender: What is the difference? Medical News Today. Retrieved from https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/232363#gender
Prewitt-Freilino, J. L., Caswell, T. A., & Laakso, E. K. (2011). The gendering of language: A comparison of gender equality in countries with gendered, natural gender, and genderless languages. Sex Roles, 66, 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0083-5
Rhode, D. L. (2016). Appearance as a feminist issue. SMU Law Review, 69(4). https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol69/iss4/2
Ross, E. (2009). In can the subaltern speak? INNERVATE, 2, 385-391. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/english/documentsinnervate/09-10/0910rosssubaltern.pdf
Spivak, G.C. (2010). Can the subaltern speak? New York, USA: Columbia University Press
Stahlberg, D., Braun, F., Irmen, L., & Sczesny, S. (2007). Representation of the sexes in language. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 163–187). New York: Psychology.
Williams, M. (2016). Beauty & sadness in Yasunari Kawabata. Japan SPOTLIGHT, pp. 56-59. Retrieved on March 14, 2021, from https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Beauty+and+Sadness+in+Yasunari+Kawabata.-a0444015144
Williamson, A. (2001). Introduction. almost a girl: male writers and female identification. Charlottesville, VA: The University Press of Virginia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v6i2.5426
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Regie Panadero Amamio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indexed and abstracted in:
IJHS Sinta 3 Certificate (S3 = Level 3)
International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) has been nationally accredited Sinta 3 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 4 No 1, 2020 till Vol 8 No 2, 2024
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
p-ISSN: 2597-470X (since 31 August 2017); e-ISSN: 2597-4718 (since 31 August 2017)
Notice: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the editorial team or publishers.
International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) is a scientific journal in English published twice a year, namely in September and March, by Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.