ON PRAGMATIC IMPLICATURE: POLITICAL LANGUAGES IN 2018 ELECTIONS IN ACEH

Muhammad Hasyimsyah Batubara(1*),

(1) STAIN TAKENGON ACEH TENGAH ACEH
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Indonesian politics in the reform era provided a broad space for anyone to participate in competing for the executive and legislative seats. This impacts on how candidates or partners are able to sell themselves to the community in order to get positive sentiment in the eyes of the community. One way politicians make votes is how they use language as a function of communication to boost popularity and electability. To conduct political communication, politicians generally use advertising media, especially outdoor promotional media to propagate people. From the author's observation, the language used in the outdoor promotion media, almost all regional election 2018 candidates in Aceh (Pidie Jaya, South Aceh, and Subulussalam) used language in the realm of pragmatic studies. Text in outdoor advertising media tends to use the meaning of implicature. Speech acts in outdoor advertising in the Pidie Jaya area are dominated by assertive/collaborative illocutionary utterances. There were 5 assertions of assertive illocutionary speech, 3 directive illocutionary speech acts, and one outdoor advertisement containing a mixture of assertive ilocution and direct illocutionary. In the South Aceh area 9 assertive ilocutionary utterances were found, and direct illocutionary speech acts were used for 5 utterances. Whereas in the Subulussalam area there are 5 utterances in assertive/collaborative illocutionary and directive utterances. A good understanding of implicature is learning for us in capturing the meaning of speech messages or speech acts of candidates for regional elections, which in the end are able to make smart political choices from the speeches and discourses of politicians that we consider relevant to the situation, of course also from track record support candidate so far. In the end we are not trapped like the statement delivered by Charles de Gaulle, President of the French Republic "Politicians never believe in their own words, they are actually surprised when people believe it". And the chosen one "Truly the best of men for thee to employ is the (man) who is strong and trustworthy." (QS. Al-Qashas: 26).


Keywords


Language, Political Communication, Pragmatics, Implicature

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Quran. (1978). Al-Quran dan terjemahan. Jakarta: Departemen Agama RI.

Allan K (1994). Speech act classification and definition. In Asher R (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (vol. 6). Oxford: Pergamon Press. 41244127.

Arifin, A. (2003). Komunikasi politik dan pers Pancasila. Jakarta: Media Sejahtera.

Austin, J.L. (1975) How to do things with words (2nd ed). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Blumler, J. G. (2019). A fresh perspective on politicians and the media. Political Communication, 36(1), 190-194.

Bussmann, H. (2006). Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics (Gregory Trauth and Kerstin Kazzazi, Ed.). London and New York: Routledge.

Taylor, C. R., Franke, G. R., & Bang, H. K. (2006). Use and effectiveness of billboards: Perspectives from selective-perception theory and retail-gravity models. Journal of advertising, 35(4), 21-34.

Cristal, D. (2006). Language encyclopedia. In The cambridge ensiclopedia of language (2nd ed., p. 430). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Edquist, J., Horberry, T., Hosking, S., & Johnston, I. (2011). Effects of advertising billboards during simulated driving. Applied Ergonomics, 42(4), 619626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.08.013

Edwards, J. (2009). Language and identity an introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Eyecorp. (2004). Out-of-home advertising. Retrieved from http://www.eyecorp.com.au/content.asp?%0Asiteid200

Filiquarian. (2008). Advertising-for- Know-it-alls. USA: Filiquarian Publising LLC.

Finch, G. (1998). How to study linguistics. New York: Palcrave Macmillan.

Gould, P. (1998). The unfinished revolution: How the modernisers saved the labour party. London, UK: Little Brown and Company.

Holmes, J. (2018). Sociolinguistics vs pragmatics: Where does the boundary lie? In Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick (Ed.), Pragmatics and its interfaces (294th ed.). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Joseph, J. E. (2006). No Title. George Square, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.

Kaid, L. L. (2004). Handbook Of political communication research. New Jersey: University of Florida, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Industrial Avenue Mahwah.

Rose, K.R & G. Kasper. (2001). Pragmatics in Language Teaching. In Rose, K.R. and G. Kasper (eds), Pragmatics in Language Teaching (pp.1-9). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kelley, L.D., & D. W. J. (2004). Advertising media planning: A brand management approach. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

Kim, H. M., & Baek, Y. M. (2018). The power of political talk?: How and when it mobilizes politically efficacious citizens campaign activity during elections. Asian Journal of Communication, 0(0), 117. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2018.1431295

Kridalaksana, H. (2008). Kamus Linguistik (4th ed). Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Kroeger, P. R. (2018). Analyzing meaning: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics (Textbooks). Berlin: Language Science Press.

Leech, G. (1991). Principle of pragmatics. London: Longman.

Levinson, S.C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics an introduction. Malden, Massachusetts: Oxford University Press.

Mey, J. L. (2009). Concise encyclopedia of pragmatics (2nd ed). UK: Elsevier Ltd.

Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2008). Tesaurus bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Rowe, B. M. and D. P. L. (2016). A concise introduction to linguistics (4th ed). New York: Routledge.

Sissors, J.Z., & Baron, R.B. (2002). Advertising media planning (6th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Sobur, A. (2013). Semiotika komunikai. Bandung: PT Rosdakarya Offset.

Taylor, C. R. (1997). A technology whose time has come or the same old litter on a stick? An analysis of changeable message billboards. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 16(2), 179186.

Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. London and New York: Longman Pearson.

Vanden Bergh, B.G., & Katz, H.E. (1999). Advertising principles: Choice, challenge, change. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Press.

Woodside, A. (n.d.). Outdoor advertising as experiments. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 229237.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v3i2.2189

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Muhammad Hasyimsyah Batubara




Indexed and abstracted in:

 

         

 

IJHS Sinta 3 Certificate (S3 = Level 3)

International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) has been nationally accredited Sinta 3 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 4 No 1, 2020 till Vol 8 No 2, 2024

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

p-ISSN: 2597-470X (since 31 August 2017); e-ISSN: 2597-4718 (since 31 August 2017)

Flag Counter

Notice: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the editorial team or publishers.

International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) is a scientific journal in English published twice a year, namely in September and March, by Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.