THE LEXICONS OF ANIMAL CLASSIFICATION IN JAVANESE: A COGNITIVE SEMANTICS APPROACH

Danang Satria Nugraha(1*),

(1) Departement of Language and Art Education, Sanata Dharma University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aimed to describe the lexicons of animal classification in Javanese. The classification refers to a categorization system based on the semantic aspects of naming constructions. Through a combination of observation method (or simak method) based on Blommaerts model (2013), constructions such as mendhapitik kampung, and celeng collected from the use of Javanese both oral and written. Based on semantical analysis techniques, the data are analyzed in line with the use of padan method and interpreted based on Durantis theory (2004). The results of the analysis are presented in description along with the classification chart. In general, the lexicons in animal classification can be devided into, at least, five classifications, namely classification (a) ingon-ingonan, (b) alasan, (c) satoan, (d) buron, and (e) pangirid. In accordance with the world view of Javanese speakers, there are three wisdom presented in the animal classification, namely (a) ora mateni sakabehe do not kill every living thing(b) ora ngrusak sakabehe do not broke anythingand (c) ora mangan kewan do not meal the specific animals. For further study, the contrastive analysis on lexicons of plants and animals classification in Javanese, espcially in farming register, is the interesting research topic in the light of Cognitive Semantics.

Keywords


Lexicons of Animal Classification, Linguistic Constructions, Speaker of Javanese, Cognitive Semantics.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baryadi, I.P. (2015). Teori-teori Linguistik Pascastruktural Memasuki Abad ke-21. Yogyakarta: PT Kanisius.

Blommaert. (2009). Ethnography, Superdiversity, and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity. (Bristol: Multilingual Matters)

Brown, K. (2008). Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 2nd Edition. London: Elsevier.

Croft, W. & Cruse, D.A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Danesi, M. (2004). A Basic Course in Anthropological Linguistics. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press Inc.

Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Evans, V. & Melanie, C.G.,. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction Cognitive Semantics.

Evans, V. (2007). A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Foley, W.A. (1997). Anthropological Linguistics: an Introduction. United States: Blackwell Publisher.

Geeraerts, D. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings. In In Geeraerts, D., Dirven, R., & Taylor, J.R. (Eds). Cognitive Linguistics Research 40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Geeraerts, D. & Cuykens, H. (2007). Introduction Cognitive Lingustics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Isac, D. & Reiss, C. (2008). I-Language: An Introduction to Linguistics as Cognitive Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kridalaksana, H. (2008). Kamus Linguistcis. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

Kurnia, E.D. (2013). Penggunaan Leksem Binatang dalam Peribahasa Jawa. Lingua IX (I), pp. 8 17. Retrived from http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/lingua, November 2nd 2018.

Nesset, T. (2008). Abstract Phonology in a Concrete Model: Cognitive Linguistics and the Morphology-Phonology Interface. In Geeraerts, D., Dirven, R., & Taylor, J.R. (Eds). Cognitive Linguistics Research 40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Pasaribu, T.A. (2013). A Cognitive Linguistic Analysis of Indonesian Love Metaphors. Prosiding Seminar Internasional Studi Bahasa dari Berbagai Perspektif dalam Rangka Ulang Tahun ke-80 Prof. Dr. Soepomo Poedjosoedarmo. Yogyakarta: Program Studi S-2 Linguistik dan Jurusan Sastra Indonesia Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Sereno, M.I. (1991). Four Analogies between Biological and Cultural/Linguistic Evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 151: pp.467-507.

Sharifian, F., Ren, D., Ning, Y., & Susanne, N. (Eds). (2008). Culture, Body, and Language: Conceptualizations of Internal Body Organs Across Cultures and Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Suhandano. (2000). Klasifikasi Folk Biologi dalam Bahasa Jawa: Sebuah Pengamatan Awal. Jurnal Humaniora Vol. XII, No.2, pp 225-230.

Taylor, J.R. (2008) Cognitive Linguistics (Routledge Handbook of Linguistics). London: Routledge.

Waddy, J.A. (1998). Classification of Plants and Animal from Groote Eylandt Aboriginal Point of View Volume I. Darwin: Australian National University North Australia Research Unit.

Yamaguchi, M., Dennis, T., & Benjamin, B. (Eds). (2014). The Intersection of Cognitive Linguistics and Linguistics Anthropology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v2i2.1799

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Danang Satria Nugraha




Indexed and abstracted in:

 

         

 

IJHS Sinta 3 Certificate (S3 = Level 3)

International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHShas been nationally accredited Sinta 3 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 4 No 1, 2020 till Vol 8 No 2, 2024

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

p-ISSN: 2597-470X (since 31 August 2017); e-ISSN: 2597-4718 (since 31 August 2017)

Flag Counter

Notice: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the editorial team or publishers.

International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) is a scientific journal in English published twice a year, namely in September and March, by Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.