Gambaran Bentuk Distorsi Kognitif pada Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual Inses
(1) Universitas Hasanuddin
(2) Universitas Hassanudin
(3)
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Incest is sexual contact that occurs between families who are related by blood. Incest includes an act of sexual violence when there is no consent from the victim. This research aims to obtain an overview of the forms of cognitive distortion of incest perpetrators against the child. This research was carried out using a qualitative case study approach with in-depth interviews based on cognitive distortion theory. Participants in this research were the biological fathers of 3 victims. Data analysis was carried out using a theory-led approach or coding the interview results based on the theory of the forms of cognitive distortion of perpetrators of sexual violence. The data analysis process is assisted by the MaxQDA application. The results of this research indicate that cognitive distortions encourage perpetrators to commit acts of incestuous sexual violence against their biological children. In line with cognitive distortion theory, there are 5 forms of cognitive distortion found in participants, namely uncontrollable (the perpetrator's inability to control himself), nature of harm (sexual relations are considered harmless), children as sexual beings (children are interested in sexual relations), dangerous world (the perpetrator views adults as dangerous) and entitlement (parents' rights to children). The event that initiated incest was the perpetrator's wife's refusal to have sexual intercourse. Disharmony in the participant's family was also caused by family functions not running well, such as religious, economic, as well as educational and socialization functions. Therefore, this research has implications for the development of further research that can focus on family functions that cause incest.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., & Cunningham-Rathner, J. (1984). Complications, consent, and cognitions in sex between children and adults. International journal of law and psychiatry, 7(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2527(84)90008-6
Amanda, & Krisnani, H. (2019). Analisis kasus anak perempuan korban pemerkosaan inses. Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial, 2(1), 120–136.
APA. (2015). APA Dictionary of Psychology.
Benedet, J., & Grant, I. (2020). Breaking the silence on father-daughter sexual abuse of adolescent girls: A case law study. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3613387
Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2008). Theories of personality (7 ed.). The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. http://www.primisonline.com
Fox, S. I. (2003). Human physiology (8 ed.). McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Friestad, C. (2012). Making sense, making good, or making meaning? Cognitive distortions as targets of change in offender treatment. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 56(3), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X11402945
Gannon, T. A., & Polaschek, D. L. L. (2006). Cognitive distortions in child molesters: A re-examination of key theories and research. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(8), 1000–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPR.2005.11.010
Jamisetty, V., & Boer, D. P. (2016). A qualitative study of incest offender implicit theories with the use of a modified assessment tool. Journal of Psychology & Clinical Psychiatry, Volume 5(Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.15406/JPCPY.2016.05.00307
Komnas Perempuan. (2020). Catahu 2020: Kekerasan meningkat kebijakan penghapusan kekerasan seksual untuk membangun ruang aman bagi perempuan dan anak perempuan, Catatan Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan Tahun 2019. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Zn_brQmp6BLN5wbHfCdbh-o-3EngmAjJ/view
Komnas Perempuan. (2021). Catahu 2021: Perempuan dalam himpitan pandemi: Lonjakan kekerasan seksual, kekerasan siber, perkawinan anak dan keterbatasan penanganan di tengah covid-19, Catatan Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan Tahun 2020. www.komnasperempuan.go.id
Mann, R. E., & Hollin, C. R. (2007). Sexual offenders’ explanations for their offending. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 13(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600701365621
MaPPI FHUI. (2016). kekerasan seksual di indonesia: Data, Fakta, & Realita.
Mihailides, S., Devilly, G. J., & Ward, T. (2004). Implicit cognitive distortions and sexual offending. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16(4), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320401600406
Puhlman, D. J., & Pasley, K. (2016). Father role, history of. Encyclopedia of Family Studies, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119085621.WBEFS336
Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2011). Theories of personality (11 ed.). Cengage Learning. https://books.google.com/books/about/Theories_of_Personality.html?hl=id&id=oStTCwAAQBAJ
Tuliah, S. (2018). Kajian motif pelaku kekerasan seksual terhadap anak melalui modus operandi di lingkungan keluarga. eJournal Sosiatri/Sosiologi, 6(2). https://ejournal.ps.fisip-unmul.ac.id/site/?p=1130
Tursilarini, T. Y. (2017). Dampak kekerasan seksual di ranah domestik terhadap keberlangsungan hidup anak. Media Informasi Penelitian Kesejahteraan Sosial, 41(1), 77–92. https://e-journal.kemensos.go.id/index.php/mediainformasi/article/view/2277/1124
Ward, T. (2000). Sexual offenders’ cognitive distortions as implicit theories. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5(5), 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(98)00036-6
Ward, T., & Keenan, T. (1999a). Child molesters’ implicit theories. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(8), 821–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626099014008003
Ward, T., & Keenan, T. (1999b). Child molesters’ implicit theories. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(8), 821–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626099014008003
Ward, T., Polaschek, D. L. L., & Beech, A. R. (2006). Theories of sexual offending. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Will, D. (1983). Approaching the incestuous and sexually abusive family. Journal of adolescence, 6(3), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1971(83)80037-2
Wright, P., Nobrega, J., Langevin, R., & Wortzman, G. (1990). Brain density and symmetry in pedophilic and sexually aggressive offenders. Annals of Sex Research, 3(3), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849186/METRICS
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/suksma.v5i2.8255
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.