Pola Komunikasi Guru-Murid di Kelas dalam Perspektif Teori Empat Wacana Lacan
(1) Faculty of Psychology, Sanata Dharma University
(2) Faculty of Psychology, Sanata Dharma University
(3) Faculty of Psychology, Sanata Dharma University
(4) Faculty of Psychology, Sanata Dharma University
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The essence of education is communication between educators and students. Teaching as a school education practice has two aspects, namely informative in the framework of forming skills and formative in the context of forming the personality of students. This current study aims to reveal the formative aspects of teacher-student communication patterns in the context of learning subjects in class based on Lacan's Theory of the Four Discourses. The research participants consisted of teachers and students of grades IV and V as class units who were carrying out Social Sciences lessons in three elementary schools in Yogyakarta. Data were collected through audio recordings of teacher-student communication in class. Data were transcribed and analyzed by four researchers separately, the results were discussed to find emerging themes derived from Lacan's Theory of the Four Discourses. The results showed that three types of Lacanian discourse emerged in teacher-student communication in the three schools studied, namely Discourse of the Master, Discourse of the University, and Discourse of the Analyst. This research will be followed up with research on the types of Lacanian discourse that are applied in writing textbooks for subjects in elementary schools including but not limited to Social Sciences.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bailly, L. (2009). Lacan. A beginner’s guide. Oneworld.
Bellack, A.A., Kliebard, H.M., Hyman, R.T., & Smith, Jr., F.L. (1966). The language of the classroom. Teachers College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University.
Bracher, M. (1988). Lacan’s theory of the four discourses. Prose Studies: History, Theory, Criticism, 11(3), 32-49. DOI: 10.1080/01440358808586349
Bracher, M. (2006). Radical pedagogy: Identity, generativity, and social transformation. Palgrave Macmillan.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3:2, 77-101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, T. (2008). Lacan, subjectivity and the task of mathematics education research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68, 227-245. Doi: 10.1007/s10649-007-9111-3
Bryant, L. R. (2008). Žižek’s new universe of discourse: Politics and the discourse of the capitalist. Int. J. Žižek Stud. 2, 1–48.
Evans, D. (1996). An introductory dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. Routledge.
Fink, B. (1995). The master signifier and the four discourses. Dalam dalam D. Nobus (Ed.). (1995). Key concepts of Lacanian psychoanalysis (hlm. 29-47). Other Press.
Han, B-C. (2015). The burnout society. Stanford Briefs.
Hetrick, L. (2014). The [art] teacher as Lacan’s subject-supposed-to-know. Synnyt 2(1): 33-44.
Johnson, T.R. (2014). The other side of pedagogy: Lacan’s four discourses and the development of the student writer. SUNY Press.
Lacan, J. (1990). Television: A challenge to the psychoanalytic establishment (Penerj. D. Hollier, R. Krauss, A. Michelson). W. W. Norton & Company.
Lai, Y-Y. (2014). Four discourses. Dalam R. Butler (ed.), The Žižek dictionary (hlm. 97-102). New York: Routledge.
Mann, S.J. (2001). Alternative perspectives on the student experience: Alienation and engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 7-19.
Markham, M. (1999). Through the looking glass: Refllective teaching through a Lacanian lens. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(1), 55-76.
Martinus. (2020). Kualitas pendidikan di Indonesia. Diunduh dari https://www.kompasiana.com/martinus44557687/5fde04b98ede483064410923/kualitas-pendidikan-di-indonesia
Shiraishi, S.S. (1995). Young heroes: The family and school in New Order Indonesia. University Microfilms.
Sudiarja, A., Subanar, G.B., Sunardi, St., & Sarkim, T. (2006, Eds.). Karya lengkap Driyarkara. Esai-esai filsafat pemikir yang terlibat penuh dalam perjuangan bangsanya. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Thomas, B.A. (2012). Psychologizing and the anti-psychologist: Dewey, Lacan and contemporary art education. Studies in Art Education. A Journal of Issues and Research, 53(4), 330-346.
Vanheule, S. (2016). Capitalist discourse, subjectivity and Lacanian Psychoanalysis. Front. Psychol. 7:1948. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01948
Verhaeghe, P. (1997). Does the woman exist? From Freud’s hysteric to Lacan’s feminine. Other Press, Llc.
Wahono, F. (2021). Pendidikan yang memerdekakan. Transformasi Ki Hadjar Dewantara dan Y.B. Mangunwiajaya untuk millenial baru. Cinde Books.
Wolfe, P. (2010). Undersatanding critical literacy through Lacan’s four orders of discourse model. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5(2), 153-166.
Žižek, S. (t.t.). Jacques Lacan's four discourses. https://www.lacan.com/zizfour.htm
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/suksma.v4i1.5500
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.