Pendekatan Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif Filsafat Ilmu Untuk Penelitian Psikologi
(1) Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Sanata Dharma
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Psychology has been gaining a good reputation in science and society. It
has contributed positively to the human life and progress. But as a growing
science, psychology has both external and internal problems. One of them is
reflected in the dispute on the quantitative and qualitative paradigm used by
its scientists. What psychology should do and which attitudes its scientists
should have? It is important that its scientist starts by acknowledging his or
her identity. Then, the next important thing is to rethink about the nature
of psychology itself. How does psychology come into existence? How has
it been growing? What is its uniqueness? Psychologists themselves have to
consider seriously the scientific nature of their knowledge as well as their
scientific attitudes. Philosophy of science will help to clarify and explain the
disputed problem.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bahm, Archie J.,
What is Ilmu, World Books, New Mexico.
Brown, J.B.,
Why Thought Experiments Transcend Empiricism, dalam Christopher
Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science, Blackwell,
Malden, 23-43.
Larrabee, Harold A.,
Reliable Knowledge. Scientific Methods in the Sosial Studies, (Revised Edition),
Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
Margolis, J.,
Introduction to Philosophical Problems, Continuum, London.
Mitcham, C. & Robert Frodeman,
New Directions in The Philosophy of Science: Toward a Philosophy if
Science Policy, Philosophy Today 48 (2004), 3-15.
Poerwandari, Elisabeth K.,
Pendekatan Kualitatif dalam Penelitian Psikologi, Lembaga Pengembangan
Sarana Pengukuran dan Pendidikan Psikologi Universitas Indonesia,
Jakarta
Suriasumantri, Jujun S.,
Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Pengantar Populer, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta.
Verhaak, C. & Imam, H.R.,
Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan, Gramedia, Jakarta.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.