Dampak Institusi pada Penerapan Teknologi Pertanian Mina Padi terhadap Pengembangan Kapabilitas Petani sebagai Prakondisi Kesejahteraan (Studi Kasus Kelompok Tani di Dusun Samberembe Desa Candibinangun Kecamatan Pakem)
(1) PT Labs Indonesia Medika Utama Jakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the impact of institutions towards the application of agricultural technology to farmer capabilities’ development. The utilization of agricultural technology is commonly viewed as an appropriate way to develop agricultural sector, particularly to empower smallholder farmers. Nevertheless, practically, the degree of successful application of a technology depends on certain preconditions. One of such preconditions is institution. This study attempts to analyze a case of an agricultural setting with a technology application at Samberembe, Candibinangun, Pakem. Data collection is conducted through interviews, observation, and documental study. The interviewees are mina padi farmers, farmer group leader, agricultural instructors, village apparatus, and agricultural activists. The results show that the existence of institutions related to the case in one way ensures farmers’ capabilities development, but in another way gives a kind of barriers, particularly in the use of an agricultural technology, namely mina padi. Such institutional design, at the formal, provides opportunity for farmers to access three features i.e. the introduction of agricultural technology, a range of agricultural facilities, and farming trainings. All of these features simultaneously build a precondition for the farmers in achieving the wellbeing. Meanwhile, the existence of informal institutions that created from daily habits of the farmers in managing farm to some extent weakens the development of farmers’ knowledge and skills. Based on the study results, there is an opportunity for those who have authorities in the relevant domains of an agricultural technology application in order to improve the impact of the program by giving more concern to any particular conditions of the farmers, including their informal institution, rather than just applying the program without considering the actual condition of the related field.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
/Petani. “Hasil Verbatim Wawancara pada Petani di Dusun Samberembe.” Oleh Fatma Nurfera (12 Juli 2020).
/KelompokTani. “Hasil Verbatim Wawancara pada Kelompok Tani Ngudi Makmur di Dusun Samberembe.” Oleh Fatma Nurfera (13 Juli 2020).
/PemDesa. “Hasil Verbatim Wawancara pada Perangkat Desa Candibinangun.” Oleh Fatma Nurfera (14 Juli 2020).
/Penyuluh. “Hasil Verbatim Wawancara pada Penyuluh Pertanian Wilayah V (Pakem dan Turi).” Oleh Fatma Nurfera (14 Juli 2020).
/Penggiat. “Hasil Verbatim Wawancara pada Penggiat Pertanian di Pakem.” Oleh Fatma Nurfera (14 Juli 2020).
“Naturalistic Epistemology,” by Thomas Walle, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ISSN 2161-0002, https://www.iep.utm.edu/, 11 Mei 2020.
Abate, G. T., Shahidur, R., Carlo. B & Kindie, G. 2016. Rural Finane and Agricultural Technology Adoption in Ethiopia: Does the Institutional Design of Lending Organizations Matter?. World Development, 84, 235-253.
Ansah, I.G., Lambongang, M., & Donkoh, S.A. Ghana’s Planting for Food and Jobs Programme: A Look at the Role of Capability in Farmers’ Participation. 2020. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Vol. 21(2): Hal 161-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2020.1745162.
Arsyad, Lincolin. 2014. Institusi, Biaya Transaksi, dan Kinerja Ekonomi: Sebuah Tinjauan Teoritis. Paper disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional dan Sidang Pleno ISEI XVII dengan tema “Pembaharuan Institusi Ekonomi dan Mutu Modal, 3-5 September, di Ternate, Indonesia.
Badan Pusat Statistik DIY. 2019. Hasil Survei Pertanian Antar Sensus (SUTAS) 2018. DIY: Badan Pusat Statistik DIY.
Badan Pusat Statistik DIY. 2019. Indikator Tingkat Hidup Pekerja/Karyawan DIY Agustus 2017-2018. DIY: Badan Pusat Statistik DIY.
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2018. Luas Panen dan Produksi Beras. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2019. Penduduk Berumur 15 Tahun ke atas Menurut Jenis Kegiatan Utama 1986-2018. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
Bananiek, Sri dan Zainal Abidin. 2013. Faktor-Faktor Sosial Ekonomi yang Mempengaruhi Adopsi Teknologi Pengelolaan Tanaman Terpadu Padi Sawah di Sulawesi Tenggara. Jurnal Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pertanian, Vol. 16 (2): hal: 111-121.
Baxter, P & Jack, Susan. 2008. Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementattion for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report, Vol. 13 (4): hal 544-559.
Bobihoe, Julistia., Asni, N & Endrizal. 2015. Kajian Teknologi Mina Padi di Rawa Lebak di Kabupaten Batanghari Provinsi Jambi. Jurnal Lahan Suboptimal, Vol. 4(1): hal 47-56.
Camagni, Roberto & Roberto Capello. 2013. Regional Innovation Patterns and the EU Regional Policy Reform: Toward Smart Innovation Policies. Growth and Change, 44(2), hal: 335-389.
Creswell, John W, penerj. 2016. Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approach. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Deakin, Liz, Mrigesh Kshatriya & Terry Sunderland. 2016. Agrarian change in tropical landscapes.
Dinas Pertanian, Perikanan dan Kehutanan Kabupaten Sleman. 2016. Gerakan Pengembangan Mina Padi Kolam Dalam di Kabupaten Sleman. Materi disampaikan pada Pertemuan Bimbingan Teknis Peningkatan Kapasitas Penyuluh Pada Dinas Pertanian, Perikanan, dan Kehutanan Kabupaten Sleman, 26-28 April, di Sleman.
Flor, R. J., Grant, S., Madonna, C., Zainal, A., Nasrudin., Harro & Cees, L. Farmers, institutions and technology in agricultural change processes: outcomes from Adaptive Research on rice production in Sulawesi, Indonesia. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, Volume 14(2): hal 166-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2015.1066976.
Furubotn, Eirik G & Rudolf Richter. 2008. Institutions and Economic Theory. United States of America: The University of Michigan Press.
Golafshani, Nahid. 2003. Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, Vol. 8(4): Hal 597-606.
Haenssgen, Marco J & Proochista Ariana. 2017. The place of technology in the Capability Approach. Oxford Development Studies, Vol. 46(1): Hal: 98-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2017.1325456.
Indarti, Sri Henny. 2017. Pembangunan Indonesia dalam Pandangan Amartya Sen. The Indonesian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 3(1).
Jack, B. Kelsey. 2013. Market inefficiencies and the adoption of agricultural technologies in developing countries. California: California Digital Library. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6m25r19c.
Jahan, Selim. 2019. Human Development and Universalism: From Ideas to Policies. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Vol. 20(2): Hal 233-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2019.1574726.
Jaya, Wihana Kirana. Mengenal Lebih Dekat Teori Kelembagaan Baru (New Institutional Economic). 29 juli 2012. Diakses di https://feb.ugm.ac.id/en/research/lecturer-s-article/artikel-dosen/829-mengenal- lebih-dekat-teori-ekonomi-kelembagaan-baru-new-institutional-economic.
Johari Sasa & Syahromi, O. 2006. Sistem Mina Padi dalam Perspektif Produktivitas Lahan Pendapatan, dan Lingkungan. Penelitian Pertanian Tanaman Pangan, Vol. 25(2).
Kassie, Menale., Shiferaw, B., Muricho, G. 2011. Agriculture Technology, Crop Income, and Poverty Alleviation in Uganda. World Development, Vol. 39(10): Hal: 1784-
Martina. 2017. Penerapan Teknologi Pertanian Pada Usahatani Padi Sawah di Kecamatan Muara Batu Kabupaten Aceh Utara. Jurnal Agribisnis Universitas Malikussaleh, Vol. 2(1).
Martono, N. 2016. Sosiologi Perubahan Sosial. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Mendola, M. 2007. Agricultural Technologi Adoption and Poverty Reduction: A Propensity-Score Matching Analysis for rural Bangladesh. Food Policy, Vol. 32(3): Hal: 372-393.
Minten, Bart & B. Barrett, C. 2008. Agricultural Technology, Productivity, and Poverty in Madagascar. World Development, Vol. 36(5): Hal 797-822.
Mosher, A.T. 1970. Getting Agriculture Moving. United States of America: Pyramid Books.
Mubyarto. 1989. Pengantar Ekonomi Pertanian. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Mueller, B & Charler, M. 2016. The Political Economy of the Brazilian Model of Agricultural Development: Institutions versus Sectoral Policy. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.qref.2016.07.012.
Nambiar, Shankaran. 2013. Capabilities, conversion factors and institutions. Progress in Development Studies, Vol. 13(3), Hal: 221-230.
North, D.C. (1991). Institution. Journal of Economic Perspective. Vol. 5(1): Hal 97- 112.
Oosterlaken, Ilse. 2012. The Capability Approach, Technology and Design. Heidelberg: Springer. DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-3879-9.
Paranata, dkk. 2012. Mengurai Model Kesejahteraan Petani. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan, (5): Hal 90-102. http://doi.org/10.15294/jejak.v5i1.4633
Pemerintah Kabupaten Sleman. (2011). Gerakan Pengembangan Mina Padi Kolam Dalam di Kabupaten Sleman: Budaya Pertanian Masyarakat Sleman: Dinas Pertanian, Perikanan dan Kehutanan Kabupaten Sleman.
Pemerintah Kabupaten Sleman. (2016). Action Plan Kawasan Pertanian. Sleman: Dinas Pertanian, Pangan dan Perikanan Kabupaten Sleman.
Poerwandari, Kristi. 2011. Pendekatan Kualitatif untuk Penelitian Perilaku Manusia. Depok: LPSP3.
Robeyns, Ingrid. 2005. The Capability Approach: A Theoritical Survey. Journal of Human Development, Vol. 6(1).
Soetrisno. 1999. Pembangunan Pertanian Sebuah Tinjauan Sosiologis. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.
Tantri, Nesya., Triana, Dewi & Ebban, Bagus. 2018. Kajian Penerapan Teknologi Pertanian Organik Pada Usahatani Padi di Desa Rowosari Kecamatan Sumberjambe Kabupaten Jember. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis, Vol. 2(3): Hal 234-243.
Temel, T., W Janssen, F. Karimov. 2002. The Agricultural Innovation System of Azerbaijan: An Assessment of Institutional Lingkages. Country Report No. 64. International Service of National Agricultural Research (ISNAR).
The World Bank. 2006. Making the New Indonesia Work for the Poor. Jakarta: The World Bank Office Jakarta.
United Nation Development Programe. 2001. Human development report 2001: Making new technologies work for human development. New York: Oxford Univerity Press.
Vansteenkiste, Jennifer & Schuller, Mark. 2017. The Gendered Space of Capabilities and Functionings: Lessons from Haitian Community-Based Organizations. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2017.1411893
Wangke, Welson Marthen., Benu, Olfie., Hermina, A. 2011. Penerapan Teknologi Usahatani Padi Sawah di Desa Sendangan Kecamatan Kakas Kabupaten Minahasa. ASE, Vol. 7(1): Hal 53-57.
Wu, H., Ding, S., Pandey S., & Tao, D. 2010. Assesing The Impact of Agricultural Technology Adoption on Farmers’ well-being using propensity score matching analysis in Rural China. Asian Economic Journal, Vol. 24(2): Hal: 141-160.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications Design and Methods sixth edition. London: SAGE Publications.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/exero.v3i1.4236
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 EXERO : Journal of Research in Business and Economics