UNIVERSITYS KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION ROLE IN THE TIME OF KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY AND COLONISATION: A REVIEW FROM CAPABILITY APPROACH LITERATURE
(1)
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Munculnya ekonomi pengetahuan sebagai paradigma dalam kebijakan ekonomi dan hadirnya pandangan Jurgen Habermas mengenai kolonisasi sistem atas dunia hidup menyentuh identitas dan misi universitas secara mendasar. Universitas sebagai locus pengembangan pengetahuan demi pembangunan manusia berada di bawah hubungan-hubungan kekuasaan ekonomi dan politik yang cenderung membatasi peran universitas dalam menanggapi persoalan masyarakat. Artikel ini berupaya meninjau realitas itu dengan bantuan telaah literatur yang mempergunakan pendekatan kapabilitas menurut Amartya Sen. Argumen yang diajukan artikel ini adalah bahwa, dalam perspektif pendekatan kapabilitas, universitas sebagai agent of change dan bagian dari kekuatan civil society cenderung menjadi sub sistem dari kekuasaan pasar dan politik sehingga potensi ketercerabutan universitas dari konteks keberadaannya menjadi cenderung besar dan peran pengembangan pengetahuan yang disandangnya terdistorsi. Dibutuhkan jalan alternatif, khususnya dalam pembaruan institusional, untuk membongkar keterbatasan peran kontributif universitas sebagai lembaga pengembangan pengetahuan.
Kata kunci: pendekatan kapabilitas, universitas, ekonomi pengetahuan, kolonisasi.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amir, Sulfikar and Yanuar Nugroho. 2013. Beyond the Triple Helix: Framing STS in the Developmental Context. Bulletin of Science
Technology & Society. Vol 33. Page 115-126.
Ball, Terrance. 2001. Imagining Marketopia. Dissent. Vol 48. No 3. Page 78.
Becker, Gary S. 1993. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Boni, Alejandra and Des Gasper. 2012. Rethinking the Quality of Universities: How Can Human Development Thinking Contribute? Journal of Human Development and Capabilities. Vol 13. No 3. Page 451-470.
Boni, Alejandra and Melanie Walker. 2016. Universities and Global Human Development: Theoretical and Empirical Insights for Social Change. Oxon: Routledge.
. 2013. Human Development and Capabilities: Re-imagining the University of the Twenty-First Century. Oxon: Routledge.
Castells, Manuel. 1999. Flows, Networks, and Identities: A Critical Theory of the Informational Society. InCritical Education in the New Information Age. Introduction by Peter McLaren. Lanham etc.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Page 37-64.
Crocker, David A. and Ingrid Robeyns. 2010. Capability and Agency. In Christhoper W. Morris (Ed.). Amartya Sen. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press. Page 60-90.
Delanty, Gerard. 2001. The University in the Knowledge Society. Organization. Vol 8. No 2. Page 149-153.
Deneulin, Sverine. 2008. Beyond Individual Freedom and Agency: Structures of Living Together in the Capability Approach to Development. In Flavio Comim, Mozaffar Qizilbash and Sabina Alkire (Eds.). The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Page 104-123.
Deneulin, Sverine, Mathias Nebel and Nicholas Sagovsky. 2006. Transforming Unjust Structures: The Capability Approach. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Dreze, Jean and Amartya Sen. 2002. Hunger and Public Action. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 2002. Sovereign Vir tue: The Theory and Practice of Equality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Etzkowitz, Henry and Loet Leydesdorff. 2000. The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and Mode 2 to A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy. Vol 29. Page 109-123.
. 1995. The Triple Helix University-Industr y-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development. EASST Review. Vol 14. No 1. Page 14-19.
Evans, Peter. Population Health and Development: An Institutional-Cultural Approach to Capability Expansion. In Peter A. Hall and Michle Lamont (Eds.). Successful Societies: How Institutions and Culture Affect Health. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press. Page 104-127.
Fleming, Ted. 2010. Condemned to Learn: Habermas, University and the Learning Society. Dalam Mark Murphy and Ted Fleming (Eds.). Habermas, Critical Theory and Education. New York dan London: Routledge. Page 111-124.
Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott and Martin Trow. 1994. New Production of Knowledge: Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Los Angeles etc.: Sage.
Giroux, Henry A. 2013. Public Intellectuals Against the Neoliberal University. Truthout. 29 October 2013. Accessed from: http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/19654-public-intellectuals-against-the-neoliberaluniversity.
. 2003. Neoliberalism, Corporate Culture, and the Promise of Higher Education: The University as a Democratic Public Sphere. Harvard Educational Review. Vol 72. No 4. Page 425-463.
Global University Network for Innovation. 2009. Higher Education at A Time of Transformation. Hampshire: Palgrave/MacMillan.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1989. The Idea of the University: Learning Processes. In Jurgen Habermas (Ed.). The New Conser vatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians Debate. Cambridge: Polity Press. Page 171-182.
. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 2. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston: Beacon Press.
Harvey, Lee. 2005. A Histor y and Critique of Quality Evaluation in the UK. Quality Assurance in Education. Vol 13. No 4. Page 263-276.
Johnson, Susan. 2009. Institutions, Markets and Economic Development. In Sverine Deneulin and Lila Shahani (Eds.). An Introduction to the Human Development and Capability Approach: Freedom and Agency. London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan. Page 162-184.
Kezar, AdriannaJ., Tony C. Chambers and John C. Burkhardt. 2005. Higher Education for the Public Good.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Margison, Simon. 2014. University Rankings and Social Science. European Journal of Education. Vol 49. No 1. Page 45-59.
McLaren, Peter. 1999. Introduction - Traumatizing Capital: Oppositional Pedagogies in the Age of Consent. InCritical Education in the New Information Age. Introduction by Peter McLaren. Lanham etc.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.. Page 1-36.
McLean, Monica. 2006. Pedagogy and the University. London: Continuum.
Morrison, Toni. 2001. How Can Values Be Taught in This University?. Michigan Quarterly Review. Vol 40. No 2. Page 273-278.
Naidoo, Rajani. 2003. Repositioning Higher Education as A Global Commodity: Opportunities and Challenges for Future Sociology of Education Work. British Journal of Sociology of Education. Vol 24. No 2. Page 249-259.
Nixon, Jon. 2008. Relationships of Virtue: Justice as Practice. In Bob Lingard, Jon Nixon and Stewar t Ranson (Eds.). Transforming Learning inSchools and Communities: The Remaking of Education for A Cosmopolitan Society. London and New York: Continuum. Page 117-133.
North, Douglass C.. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, Martha. 2001. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Second Edition. Cambridge, U.K. New York: Cambridge University Press.
. 1997. Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defence of Reform in Liberal Education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
. 1990. Aristotelian Social Democracy. In R. Bruce Douglass, Gerald R. Mara and Henry S. Richardson (Eds.). Liberalism and the Good. New York and London: Routledge. Page 203-252.
OECD. 2004. Innovation in theKnowledge Economy: Implications for Education and Learning. Paris: OECD.
. 1996. The Knowledge-Based Economy. Paris: OECD.
Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1992. One Self as Another. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rigby, John, Yanuar Nugroho, Kathryn Morrison dan Ian Miles. 2012. Government Driving Innovation: Who Drives Innovation?. In Deborah Cox and John Rigby (Eds.). Innovation Challenges for the 21st Century. London: Routledge. Hlm 9-35.
Rizvi, Fazal and Bob Lingard. 2010. Globalizing Education Policy. Oxon: Routledge.
Robeyns, Ingrid. 2006. Three Models of Education: Rights, Capabilities and Human Capital. Theory and Research in Education. Vol 4. No 1. Page 69-84.
Schultz, Theodore W.. 1963. The Economic Value of Education. New York: Columbia University.
Sen, Amartya. 2009.The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
. 2002. How to Judge Globalism. The American Prospect. Vol 13. No 1.
. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.
. 1997. Editorial: Human Capital and Human Capability. World Development. Vol 25. No 12. Page 1959-1961.
. 1993. Capability and Well-Being. In Martha Nussbaum and Amartya Sen (Eds.). Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
. 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
. 1990. Development as Capability Expansion. In Keith Griffin dan John Knight (Eds.). Human Development and the International Development Strategy for the 1990s. London: Macmillan.
. 1985. Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
. 1982. Rights and Agency. Philosophy & Public Affairs. Vol 11. No 1. Page. 3-39.
. 1980. Equality of What?. In Sterling M. McMurrin (Ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 1. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press. Page 195-220.
Shore, Cris and Susan Wright. 1997. Policy: A New Field of Anthropology. In Cris Shore and Susan Wright (Eds.). Anthropology of Policy: Critical Perspectives on Governance and Power. London and New York: Routledge. Page 3-30.
The World Bank. 2007. Building Knowledge Economies: Advanced Strategies for Development. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
. 2003. Lifelong Learning in the Global Knowledge Economy: Challenges for Developing Countries. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
Unterhalter, Elain and Vincent Carpentier (Eds.).
Global Inequalities and Higher Education: Whose Interests Are We Serving? New York: Palgrave.
Walker, Melanie. 2010. A Human Development and Capabilities Prospective Analysis of Global Higher Education Policy. Journal of Education Policy. Vol 25. No 4. Page 485-501.
. 2006. Higher Education Pedagogies: A Capabilities Approach. Maidenhead: SRHE/Open University Press.
Welton, Michael R. 1995. In Defense of the Lifeworld: A Habermasian Approach to Adult Learning. In Michael R. Welton (Ed.). In Defense of the Lifeworld: Critical Perspectives on Adult Learning. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. Page 127-156.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.