PERSEPSI PESERTA PLPG TERHADAP MATERI PLPG
(1) 
(2) 
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aims to identify the level of participants understanding of the PLPG material. This research may also reveal the difficulties faced by participants related to the PLPG material. The material PLPG established by considering four teacher competence, namely 1) pedagogical, 2) professional, 3) personality, 4) social. Reality that had occurred, participants PLPG experiencing difficulties in terms of understanding the materials. This study describes the level of difficulty of the material PLPG to see PLPG participants perceptions. This research was conducted with reference to the type of survey research. Subjects in this study were participants PLPG Sanata Dharma the number of 124 participants. The location of this research is in LPMP Kalasan Yogyakarta. This activity was conducted from August to October 2014. Research instruments compiled by looking at the materials taught in PLPG participants and the concept of perception. PLPG perception questionnaire participants into the main data collection tool. A questionnaire was used to measure participants perceptions of the PLPG material. In addition, the researchers also used the interview to gather data that supports the main data. Based on the participants perceptions PLPG to 15 PLPG subject matter. There are 13 subject matter that is predicated quite incomprehensible, 2 subject matter predicated less incomprehensible. The material is less incomprehensible Module 5 in which there is a sub material on reasoning Mathematics, Social Studies, and the study of language and literature in Indonesia. Curriculum materials is a matter of the most poorly understood by participants PLPG, with a low score of 2.41.
Keywords: perception, PLPG material, participants PLPG, survey
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2002. Sertifikasi Guru dalam Jabatan Tahun:Rambu-rambu Pelaksanaan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Profesi Guru (PLPG).
Gibson, J. L. and Ivancevich, J. M. 1985. Organizations. United States America: Business Publications, Inc.
Hamalik, Oemar. 2003. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Hill, M. and Hupe P. 2009. Implementing Public Policy. California: Sage Publication. Inc.
Indriasih, Aini. 2005. Pembelajaran Terpadu Dalam Pengajaran IPS di Kelas III SD Garung -Lor Kaliwungu Kabupaten Kudus. Jurnal Pendidikan. Hlm. 1-6
Irianto, Jusuf. 2001. Prinsip-prinsip dasaranajemen Pelatihan. Surabaya: Insan Cendekia.
Kotler, Philip. 2000. Marketing Management: Edisi Milenium, International Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. International, Inc.
Nadler, L. 1982. Designing Training Programs: The Critical Event Model. California: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
Permendikbud Nomor 54 tahun 2013 tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan.
Permendikbud Nomor 65 tahun 2013 tentang Standar Proses.
Permendikbud Nomor 66 tahun 2013 tentang Penilalian.
Puskur. 2007. Gagasan kurikulum masa depan. Jakarta: Balitbang Puskur Depdiknas.
Rakhmat, Jalaluddin. 2004. Psikologi Ko-munikasi. Edisi kesepuluh. Bandung: Rosdakarya
Rakhmat, Jalaluddin. 1996. Psikologi Ko-munikasi. Edisi kesepuluh. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
Robbins, Stephen P. 2004. Perilaku Organisasi Buku 1. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Santosa, Puji. 2008. Materi dan pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia SD. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Sukardjo. 2008. Kumpulan materi evaluasi pembelajaran. Yogyakarta:Prodi Teknologi Pembelajaran, Pps UNY.
Suryadi, Ace dan Tilaar. (1996). Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan: Suatu Pengantar. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya.
Tilaar. 2002. Membenahi Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Tilaar& Riant Nugroho. 2008. Kebijakan Pendidikan: Pengantar untuk Memahami Kebijakan Pendidikan Sebagai Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Tim Pengembang Modul PLPG. 2013. Modul PLPG. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Walgito, Bimo. 2003. Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.