SAVING “JOGED MATARAM” VIA YOUTUBE: PRESERVATION AND DISSEMINATION OF LOCAL CULTURE IN THE DIGITAL AGE

Arif Eko Suprihono(1*),

(1) Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This research examines the paradigm shift of cultural policy within the Yogyakarta Royal Palace in embracing technology by means of social media to make the palace performance called “Joged Mataram” known to public. The data used in this qualitative research include various YouTube uploads of the screen-dance. Ethnographic method and detailed analysis of the uploads were put to use in this study. The results prove that the Yogyakarta Royal Palace had anticipated the digital age development by involving cultural citizens through the use of social media. Dance documentation products can be seen as cultural strategy in participating inthe digital life. It is also proven that the artistic approach of the Yogyakarta Royal Palace requires netizens’ participation to opine as to whether the palace performances can still meet the demands of the changing times.


Keywords


dissemination, screen-dance, preservation, YouTube uploads

Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Anderson, C. (2021). Screendance in the Wake of Screened Dance: Moving Forward Through Interactive Video. The International Journal of Screendance, 12(2021). https://doi.org/10.18061/ijsd.v12i0.7810

Ardalan, K. (2009). Globalization and culture: Four paradigmatic views. International Journal of Social Economics, 36(5), 513–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290910954013

Arendell, T. D., & Barnes, R. (2016). Dance’s duet with the camera: Motion pictures. In Dance’s Duet with the Camera: Motion Pictures. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59610-9

Aronczyk, M. (2021). Creator Culture: An Introduction to Global Social Media Entertainment. In Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab036

Anderson, C. (2021). Screendance in the Wake of Screened Dance: Moving Forward Through Interactive Video. The International Journal of Screendance, 12(2021). https://doi.org/10.18061/ijsd.v12i0.7810

Berends, H., & Deken, F. (2021). Composing qualitative process research. Strategic Organization, 19(1), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018824838

Burgess, J. and J. G. (2009). YouTube Online Video and Participatory Culture Jean. Polity Press.

Dandekar, D. N. V. (2021). The Semiotics of the Visuals, Songs, Dances and Music: Analysing Aesthetics of Indian Cinema with Reference to 3 Idiots, An Adaptation of Chetan Bhagat’s Fiction Five Point Someone. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(2), 5579–5590. https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i2.2977

Fernandes C, Coelho S. P., Vieira A. B. (2020) Dance and the (Digital) Archive: A Survey of the Field. Danc Res [Internet]. Nov 1;38(2), 271–88. https://doi.org/10.3366/drs.2020.0313

Gallardo, R., Beaulieu, L. B., & Geideman, C. (2021). Digital inclusion and parity: Implications for community development. Community Development, 52(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2020.1830815

Gioia, D. (2021). A Systematic Methodology for Doing Qualitative Research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 57(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886320982715

Gong, H. (2017). The Negotiation of Cultural Identity. 144(Icadce), 123–130.

Hadi, Y. S. (2017). The Legitimacy of Classical Dance Gagrag Ngayogyakarta. Panggung, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.26742/panggung.v27i4.295

Hadley, B. (2017). Theatre, social media, and meaning making. In Theatre, Social Media, and Meaning Making. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2019.1591091

Jayathilaka, A. (2021). Ethnography and Organizational Ethnography: Research Methodology. Open Journal of Business and Management, 09(01), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2021.91005

Johnson, N., Druckenmiller, M. L., Danielsen, F., & Pulsifer, P. L. (2021). The Use of Digital Platforms for Community-Based Monitoring. BioScience, 71(5), 452–466. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa162

Lee, M. J. (2019). Strategy for the cultural contents industry to secure competitive advantage using fourth industrial. 32, 141–163.

Li, J., & Yao, L. J. (2021). Opportunities and challenges of digital media art in the era of big data. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1856(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1856/1/012030

Liang, X., Lu, Y., & Martin, J. (2021). A review of the role of social media for the cultural heritage sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031055

McKenzie, J. (2019). Transmedia Knowledge for Liberal Arts and Community Engagement. In Transmedia Knowledge for Liberal Arts and Community Engagement. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20574-4

Mossberger, K., & Tolbert, C. J. (2021). Digital Citizenship and Digital Communities: How Technology Matters for Individuals and Communities. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 10(3), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.20210701.oa2

Onder, M. E., & Zengin, O. (2021). YouTube as a source of information on gout: a quality analysis. Rheumatology International, 41(7), 1321–1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-04813-7

Putranto.2019. (2019). Jurnal Kawistara. Jurnal Kawistara, 9(3), 349–352.

Rini, Y. S. (2020). Joged Mataram: The Concept of Dance Applied in the Present Community Life. 444(Icaae 2019), 267–270. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200703.055

Shyu, G. S., Lin, S. J., Fang, W. T., & Cheng, B. Y. (2020). How to screen suitable service improve community health care services by university students in Taiwan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155402

Suvattanadilok, M. (2021). Social media activities impact on the decision of watching films in cinema. Cogent Business and Management, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1920558

Thelwall, M. (2018). Social media analytics for YouTube comments: potential and limitations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(3), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1381821

Yogyakarta, D. I. K. (2018). wayang wong, Yogyakarta, atraksi wisata, industri budaya, komodifikasi. 8(April), 67–78.

Zabulis, X., Meghini, C., Partarakis, N., Beisswenger, C., Dubois, A., Fasoula, M., Nitti, V., Ntoa, S., Adami, I., Chatziantoniou, A., Bartalesi, V., Metilli, D., Stivaktakis, N., Patsiouras, N., Doulgeraki, P., Karuzaki, E., Stefanidi, E., Qammaz, A., Kaplanidi, D., … Galanakis, G. (2020). Representation and preservation of heritage crafts. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(4), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041461




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v5i2.4304

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Arif Eko Suprihono

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Indexed and abstracted in:

 

         

 

IJHS Sinta 3 Certificate (S3 = Level 3)

International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHShas been nationally accredited Sinta 3 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 4 No 1, 2020 till Vol 8 No 2, 2024

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

p-ISSN: 2597-470X (since 31 August 2017); e-ISSN: 2597-4718 (since 31 August 2017)

Flag Counter

International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) is a scientific journal in English published twice a year, namely in September and March, by Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

 

Note: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the editorial team or publishers.