Rights of Nature: Considering Conatus Essendi from the Perspective of New Materialism
(1) Independent Researcher, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study examines the concept of natural rights through the lens of discourse analysis, focusing on how Baruch Spinoza’s idea of conatus essendi is reinterpreted within the framework of new materialism. Traditionally, natural rights have often been confined to the anthropocentric realm, ignoring the existence and agency of non-human entities. However, the emergence of the discourse of natural rights demands a paradigm shift, encouraging the recognition of the intrinsic rights of nature. Using a discourse analysis approach, this study seeks to examine how arguments and narratives supporting natural rights are constructed and contested in various texts, such as scientific publications, policy statements, and environmental activist manifestos. Specifically, the study attempts to trace Spinoza’s conatus essendi, the innate tendency of every entity to continue to exist and perpetuate itself, within the discourse of new materialism. New materialism offers a philosophical foundation that allows for the expansion of the subject’s rights, transcending the boundaries of humanity and recognizing the interconnectedness and agency of matter. Thus, this study not only highlights the ontological shift in the understanding of rights but also reveals the transformative potential of new materialism in reshaping the relationship between humans and nature. The results of this research are expected to contribute to the development of a more inclusive and sustainable human rights theory.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Ansell-Pearson, Keith. “Deleuze’s New Materialism: Naturalism, Norms, and Ethics.” Dalam The New Politics of Materialism: History, Philosophy, Science, disunting oleh Sarah Ellenzweig dan John H. Zammito, 88–109. London: Routledge, 2017.
Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press Books, 2007.
Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.
Benson, Melinda Harm. “New Materialism: An Ontology for the Anthropocene.” Natural Resources Journal 59, no. 2 (Januari 2019): 251–80.
Berry, Thomas. The Great Work: Our Way into the Future. New York: Harmony/ Bell Tower, 1999.
Braidotti, Rosi. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity, 2013.
Butler, Judith. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso, 2004.
Campos, Andre Santos. Spinoza: Basic Concepts. Exeter: Imprint Academic, 2015.
Cernadas, Gonzalo Ricci. Multitude in Spinoza, The: From Physics to Politics. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2025.
“Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador.” 2008. https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/ legislation/details/21291.
Dahlbeck, Moa De Lucia. Spinoza, Ecology and International Law: Radical Naturalism in the Face of the Anthropocene. London: Routledge, 2019.
Ejsing, Mads. “Why the Turn to Matter Matters: A Response to Post-Marxist Critiques of New Materialism.” Thesis Eleven 181, no. 1 (April 2024): 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136241240086.
Escobar, Arturo. Pluriversal Politics: The Real and the Possible. Durham: Duke University Press, 2020.
Haraway, Donna J. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press, 2016.
Kaho, Eventus Ombri. “Negosiasi Manusia dan Nonmanusia Pasca-Alih Fungsi Hutan Bakau Menjadi Tambang Garam.” Retorik: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora 12, no. 1 (Juni 2024): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.24071/ret.v12i1.7501.
Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Diterjemahkan oleh Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Keraf, A. Sonny. Etika lingkungan hidup. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2006.
———. Filsafat Lingkungan Hidup: Alam sebagai Sebuah Sistem Kehidupan Bersama Fritjof Capra. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2014.
Latour, Bruno. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.
———. We Have Never Been Modern. Diterjemahkan oleh Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.
Leopold, Aldo. A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. New York: Oxford University Press, 1949.
Mahaswa, Rangga Kala. “Tapal Batas Krisis Lingkungan Hidup Perspektif Materialisme Baru.” Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Budaya 8, no. 4 (November 2022): 1351–60. https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v8i4.1075.
Naess, Arne. Ecology, Community and Lifestyle: Outline of an Ecosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Rocca, Michael Della. Spinoza. New York: Routledge, 2008.
Spinoza, Benedictus de. Spinoza Opera II. Disunting oleh Carl Gebhardt. Heidelberg: C. Winter, 1925.
Taylor, Paul W. Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. 25th Anniversary Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.
“Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017 No 7.” New Zealand Legislation, 27 Agustus 2025. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/ public/2017/0007/latest/whole.html.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ret.v13i2.13442
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Eventus Ombri Kaho

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Retorik: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora is published by the Graduate Program in Cultural Studies at Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Retorik is also available in print edition. Please click here for contact information.








