FRAMING FAITH AND LANGUAGE: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF SOCIO-RELIGIOUS ETYMOLOGIES IN INDONESIAN LEXICOGRAPHY
Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
1. | Title | Title of document | FRAMING FAITH AND LANGUAGE: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF SOCIO-RELIGIOUS ETYMOLOGIES IN INDONESIAN LEXICOGRAPHY |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Fariz Alnizar; Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia, Indonesia |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Vika Nurul Mufidah; Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia, Indonesia; Indonesia |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Zulkarnain Yani; Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Indonesia; Indonesia |
3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Arabic term, Indonesian, KBBI, lexical etymology, socio-religious terminology |
4. | Description | Abstract | A dictionary is more than a collection of words; it is a realm of knowledge and power where language, history, and ideology meet. This research aims to explore the representation and absence of etymological traces of socio-religious terms, particularly those of Arabic origin, in the online edition of the Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI). A critical analysis of several entries shows that although since 2018 the KBBI has started to include etymological notes for some Arabic-derived words, this move remains partial, inconsistent and problematic. Terms such as modin and muslihat appear with superficial or distorted etymological explanations, while important terms in Islamic discourse such as istirjāʻ, tayamum, and barakah are missing. On the other hand, the inclusion of sectarian terms-such as Ahlussunnah, Khawarij, and Wahabi-indicates an epistemological bias as well as a reflection of the particular ideological framework at work in the compilation of the dictionary. These findings show that the KBBI is not entirely neutral as a linguistic archive, but rather a discursive arena that produces and reproduces meanings in Indonesia's socio-political landscape. Thus, the dictionary does not only function as a linguistic tool, but also a field of cultural and ideological attraction, where the authority to define language becomes a contested political issue. |
5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | English Education Study Programme of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia |
6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia in 2022 under the scheme of Strategic National Applied Research (Penelitian Terapan Kajian Strategis Nasional), Grant Number 221050000047775 |
7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2025-04-25 |
8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
8. | Type | Type | |
9. | Format | File format | |
10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/LLT/article/view/9656 |
10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v28i1.9656 |
11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching; Vol 28, No 1 (2025): April 2025 |
12. | Language | English=en | en |
14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions |
Copyright (c) 2025 Fariz Alnizar, Vika Nurul Mufidah, Zulkarnain Yani![]() This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. |