(RE)EXAMINING POLITENESS CONCEPTS AND CONTENTIONS: IMPLICATIONS ON FILIPINO BRAND OF POLITENESS

Rafael Ibe Santos(1*),

(1) University of Asia and the Pacific and University of the Philippines, Philippines
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Efforts have been made to characterize the Philippine brand of linguistic politeness but literature on the subject (including language power) remains scarce. In response, this paper (re)examines key concepts and contentions in politeness theory and attempts to draw pertinent conclusions in the way politeness in language is demonstrated in Filipino context. Discourse on politeness, spanning from its infancy (from Gricean maxims and Lakoff’s politeness rules with references to Goffman’s face) to its blossoming years courtesy of Brown and Levinson is revisited as well as the ensuing arguments on the subject. Some implications particularly the universalness claims regarding politeness, as it is juxtaposed with Filipino politeness, are then drawn. A significant observation is that local experiences and practices contradict the universalness claim of western type of politeness. Uncovered are novel vistas on Filipino politeness as reflected in day-to-day and workplace situations. Finally, ingrained in the Filipino is a self-centered, multifaceted brand of politeness that is both face-saving and designed toward achieving material or non-material gain such as work security.


Keywords


face threatening acts, Filipino politeness, politeness, positive/negative face

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agnir-Paraan, L. C. N. (2019). Filipino communication style as reflected in politeness strategies in administrative memoranda in the Philippine workplace. Journal of English Studies and Comparative Literature, 18(2), 18-38.

Aquino, C. C. (2004). Mula sa Kinaroroonan: "Kapwa, Kapatiran" and "Bayan" in Philippine Social Science. Asian Journal of Social Science, 32(1), 105-139

Arendholz, J. (2013) (In)Appropriate Online Behavior A pragmatic analysis of message board relations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Armaşu, V. D. (2012). Modern approaches to politeness theory: A cultural context. Lingua (Language & Culture), 11(1).

Batang, B. & Sales-Batang, R. (2010). Politeness and compliments in selected Ilocano Radio dramas. Journal of Research, 19(2), 9-23.

Boonkongsaen, N. (2013). Filipinos and Thais saying “no” in English. MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities Regular, 16(1), 23-40.

Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Castro, M. C. S. A. (2018). Identity and self-presentation in letters of request written by college students. International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS), 2(1), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v2i1.1257

Chang, Y. Y. (2008). Cultural “Faces” of Interpersonal Communication in the U.S. and China. Intercultural Communication Studies, 17(1), 299- 313.

Claudio, L. (2010). The honorable peculiarities of Filipino English. GMA Network News. Retrieved June 10, 2020 from https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/opinion/content/200340/thehonorable-peculiarities-of-filipino-english/story/

Correo, C. (2014). Politeness strategies deployed by Filipinos in asynchronous computer-mediated discourse 1. Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 2(2).

Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752

De Leon, K. D., & Parina, J. C. M. (2016). A study of Filipino complaints in English and Tagalog. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(1), 191-206.

Fraser, B. (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 219-236.

Gocheco, P. M. (2009). The use of politeness marker Po in television mediated political campaign advertisements in the Philippines. In Bhatia, V. K., Cheng, W., Du-Babcock, B., & Lung, J. (Eds.) Language for Professional Communication: Research, Practice & Training (pp. 71-82). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong & The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

Goldsmith, D. J. & MacGeorge, E. L. (2000). The impact of politeness and relationship on perceived quality of advice about a problem. Human Communication Research, 26(2), 234–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14682958.2000.tb00757.x

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan J. L. (Eds.). Syntax and semantics 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.

Jocano, F. L. (1999). Working with Filipinos: A cross cultural encounter. Quezon City: Punlad Research House.

Labor, J. S. (2011). A Discourse Analysis of Linguistic (Im)Politeness and Symbolic Power among Filipino Professoriate. In Andrew J. West, A. J., Getkham, K. & Singhakowinta, J. (eds.). Interdisciplinary Discourses in Language and Communication (pp. 200-214). Thailand.

Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45-79.

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Lee, E. M. (2018). Analysis of politeness strategies in Japanese and Korean conversations between males. Pragmatics, 28(1), 61-92. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.00002.lee

Leihitu, S. P. M., & Triprihatmini, V. (2021). A study of politeness strategies used by Erin Gruwell in Freedom Writers Movie. International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS), 4(2), 221-235. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v4i2.3239

Locher, M. A. & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9

Mao, L. R. (1994). Beyond politeness theory: ‘Face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(5), 451-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90025-6

Meneses, M. C. E. G. (2018). Codeswitching as a politeness marker in Sangguniang Panlalawigan regular sessions in Albay. BU R&D Journal, 21(3), 1-11.

Mulzac, K. D. (2007). Cultural dynamics and the church in the Philippines. Journal of Adventist Mission Studies, 3(2), 1-20. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1118&context=jams

Peña, I., Domigpe, J., Idos, R. V., Nacu, J. S., Doming, N. P., Paz, L., & Peñaranda, O. (2006). Pakikisama: In the spirit of camaraderie. University of California Consortium for Language Learning & Teaching (UCCLLT). Retrieved from http://www.language.berkeley.edu/ucfcp/unit4/intro.php

Rahardi, R. K. (2017). Pragmatic phenomena constellation in specific culture dimension language study. International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS), 1(1), 84-92. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.2017.010109

Redmond, M. V. (2015). Face and politeness theories. Lowa: University of Lowa Digital Repositories. https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/23684

Reyes, J. (2015). Loób and Kapwa: An introduction to a Filipino virtue ethics. Asian Philosophy, 25(2), 148-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2015.1043173

Santos, R. I. (2020). Politeness and impoliteness in Filipino as reflected in television news interviews. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). College of Arts and Letters, University of the Philippines-Diliman.

Stephen, M. D. (2013). The most acceptable hypocrisy: Legitimacy and euphemism at the United Nations security council. Paper presented at the Institute of Democracy and Human Rights (IDHR), Lunchtime Seminar Series, University of Sydney. Retrieved on June 11, 2020, from https://studylib.net/doc/18622271/working-paper---the-university-ofsydney

Wulandari, A., Hapsari, B. S., & Bram, B. (2018). Communication failures in Netflix drama series “13 reasons why”: A pragmatic analysis. International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS), 1(2), 264-272. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v1i2.1074

Yabut, H. J. & Salanga, M. G. C. (2017). Ang pangkaraniwang pagpapakahulugan at behavioral na manipestasyon ng pakikisama (definitions and manifestations of the indigenous conceptualization of the concept of pakikisama). DIWA E-Journal, Tomo 5, 93-107.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v6i1.4723

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Rafael Ibe Santos

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Indexed and abstracted in:

 

         

 

IJHS Sinta 3 Certificate (S3 = Level 3)

International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHShas been nationally accredited Sinta 3 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 4 No 1, 2020 till Vol 8 No 2, 2024

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

p-ISSN: 2597-470X (since 31 August 2017); e-ISSN: 2597-4718 (since 31 August 2017)

Flag Counter

Notice: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the editorial team or publishers.

International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) is a scientific journal in English published twice a year, namely in September and March, by Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.