Email this article AN ECOCRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF ANTHROPOCENTRISM IN THE CAMEROONIAN PRESS
(1) University of Yaounde 1, Cameroon
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The manner in which the media presents nature matters a lot. The media legitimises abusive beliefs. On this basis, this work investigated the ecologically oppressive ideologies reinforced by the Cameroonian English newspaper. Analysis focused on uncovering-to-resist discursive patterns that activated anthropocentrism (human dominance over nature). The data comprised thirty-five newspaper articles randomly selected from nine English Language newspaper publishers in Cameroon. Ecocriticrical discourse analysis (EcoCDA) is the theoretical framework adopted in this study. The descriptive statistical method (DSM) was used to analyse the data. Analyses subsumed identification, quantification and interpretation of discourse entities. Findings revealed that the Cameroonian press used diverse language patterns to manipulate agents, processes and aftermaths of environmental depletion. The press, thus, encoded anthropocentric ideologies in discursive forms like pronouns, verbs, transitivity, personification and jargon. Ecological injustices uncovered and resisted included deforestation, consumerism and growth, mineral extraction and construction, inter alia. Cognizant of the sustenance nature that offers earthly life, it was recommended that press [wo]men should refrain from manipulative language forms and stories that downplay efforts to conserve nature. They should rather cover nature-conserving stories regularly, and in language forms that align with and reinforce global efforts to protect and conserve the biophysical environment.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdul Jabar, N. & Kaariah, Y. (2017). Critical discourse analysis (CDA) as an approach to the analysis of language. Man in India, 97(16), 357-365.
Adams, C. & Gruen, L. (2014). Ecofeminism: Feminist intersections with other animals and the earth. London: Bloomsbury.
Alexander, R. (2012). How BP dealt with the aftermath of the 2010 Gulf of Mexico deep water horizon spill: Crisis communication under the microscope. Language and Ecology Research Forum. Retrieved from www.ecoling.net/articles.
Baker, S. (2006). Sustainable Development. London: Routledge.
Chen, S. (2016). Language and Ecology: A Content Analysis of Ecolinguistics as an Emerging Research Field. Ampersand, 3, 108-116.
Deluca, K. (1999). Image politics: The new rhetoric of environmental activism. New York: Guilford Press.
Ebim, M. (2016). An ecolinguistic study of media depictions of oil spillage in Ogoniland. Language & Ecology. Retrieved from www.Ecoling.Net/Articles.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. Boston: Addison Wesley.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Fill, A. & Mühlhäusler, P. (2001). The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology, and environment. London: Continuum.
Frandsen, F. & Johansen, W. (2010). Corporate crisis communication across Cultures. In A. Trosborg (Ed.) (pp. 543-569).
Griffiths, P. (2006). An introduction to English semantics and pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Halliday, M. (2001). New ways of meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics. In A. Fill & P. Mühlhäusler (Ed.), The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment (pp. 175-202). New York: Continuum.
Haugen, E. (1972). The ecology of language. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Japhet, A. & Komolafe, O. (2015). Ecolinguistics in Nigerian environmental communication: Linking the print media reports with the daily press review broadcasts. Language and Ecology. Retrieved from www.ecoling.net/articles.
Jørgensen, M. & Phillips, L. (Eds.). (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: SAGE Publications.
Jowett, B. (1921). Politica. In W. D. Ross. The Works of Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 4(1), 70-81.
Lechevrel, N. (2009). The intertwined histories of ecolinguistics and ecological approaches of language(s): Historical and theoretical aspects of a research paradigm. Symposium on Ecolinguistics: The Ecology of Science, 1-11.
Maffi, L. (1998). Language: A resource for nature. Nature and Resources: The UNESCO Journal on the Environment and Natural Resources Research, 34(4), 12-21.
Mcnenny, G. (2018). Framing the anthropocentrism: Educating for sustainability. Language & Ecology. Retrieved from http://ecolinguistics-association.org/journal.
Mesthrie, R. & Asher, R. (2001). Manipulation. In R. Mesthrie (Ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics (pp. 574-575). Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Milstein, T. (2008). When whales ‘speak for themselves’: Communication as a mediating force in wildlife tourism. Environmental Communication, 2(2), 173-192.
Mühlhäusler, P. (2003). Language of Environment: Environment of Language. London: Battlebridge.
Murtaza, G. & Qasmi, N. (2013). Style and stylistics: An overview of traditional and linguistic approaches. Galaxy: International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(3), 2278-9529.
Peeples, J. (2015). Discourse/rhetorical analysis approaches to environment, media, and communication from: The Routledge handbook of environment and communication. London: Routledge.
Ridley, M. (2010). The rational optimist: How prosperity evolves. New York: Harper.
Singer, P. (1990). The significance of animal suffering. Behav Brain Sci, 13(1), 9-12.
Steffensen, S. & Fill, A. (Eds.). (2014). Ecolinguistics: The state of the art and future horizons. Language Sciences, 41(A), 6-25.
Stibbe, A. (2001). Language, power and the social construction of animals. Society and Animals, 9(2), 145-161.
Stibbe, A. (2003). As charming as a pig: The Discursive construction of the relationship between pigs and humans. Society and Animals, 11(4), 375-392.
Stibbe, A. (2009). Advertising awareness: The ability to expose advertising discourses that undermine sustainability, and resist them. In A. Stibbe. (Ed.). The Handbook of Sustainability Literacy: Skills for a Changing World, 37-41. Foxhole, Dartington: Green Books Ltd.
Stibbe, A. (2014). Ecolinguistics and erasure: Restoring the natural world to consciousness. In C. Hart & P. Cap (Eds.). Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, 583-602. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. London: Routledge.
Van Dijk, T. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In D, Tannen et al. (Eds). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis: Second Edition, 466-485. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v5i2.4202
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Walter Abo Acha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indexed and abstracted in:
IJHS Sinta 3 Certificate (S3 = Level 3)
International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) has been nationally accredited Sinta 3 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 4 No 1, 2020 till Vol 8 No 2, 2024
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
p-ISSN: 2597-470X (since 31 August 2017); e-ISSN: 2597-4718 (since 31 August 2017)
Notice: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the editorial team or publishers.
International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) is a scientific journal in English published twice a year, namely in September and March, by Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.