POSTCOLONIAL ECOCRITICISM IN HUNGER BY ELISE BLACKWELL

Lestari Manggong

Abstract


Hunger, a novella by a contemporary American novelist, Elise Blackwell, centres in the story of a Russian botanist, Nikolai Vavilov, during the Leningrad siege in 1941. Vavilov protects his collection of seeds at the Research Institute of Plant Industry in Leningrad against all odds, to be preserved for research for future use. In the recounting moments during the siege, the narrative provides parallelism between Leningrad and the ancient city of Babylon. In postcolonial writing, this can be perceived as a form of nostalgic projection of the past (Walder, 2011). Such a parallelism triggers a postcolonial narrative analysis on the pairing of the two as affinity, focusing on the significance of the comparison between the two cities (between the apocalyptic present and the glorious past). The contribution of this parallelism will be discussed to understand the novella as a narrative mode of ecocriticism, with regards to the idea of prioritizing seeds over human lives, which also acts as the steering issue stirring the plot. By mainly referring to Garrard (2004) and Huggan and Tiffin (2010) on ecocriticism and postcolonial ecocriticism, this essay in general aims to investigate how the novella contributes new perspectives on the intertwining between postcolonial studies and ecocriticism.

Keywords


Elise Blackwell, postcolonial ecocriticism, nostalgic projection, postcolonial studies, ecocriticism

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, Hephzibah. (2003, August 31). No pepper spray? Try lines from Larkin. The Guardian. Retrieved on June 19, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/books/2003/aug/31/fiction.features2

Balaev, Michelle & Cheryll Glotfelty. (2012). The formation of a field: Ecocriticism in AmericaAn interview with Cheryll Glotfelty. Modern Language Association, 127(3), 607-616.

Bidlack, Richard. (2005). Foreword: Historical background to the siege of Leningrad. In Cynthia Simmons & Nina Perlina, Writing the siege of Leningrad (pp. 1-18). U.S.A: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Blackwell, Elise. (2008). Hunger. U.S.A.: Unbridled Books.

Buell, Lawrence. (2011). Ecocriticism: Some emerging trends. Qui parle, 19(2), 87-115.

Clark, Timothy. (2011). The Cambridge introduction to literature and the environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Estok, Simon C. (2013a). The ecophobia hypothesis: Remembering the feminist body of ecocriticism. In Greta Gaard, Simon C. Estok, & Serpil Oppermann (Eds.), International perspectives on feminist ecocriticism (pp. 70-83). London: Routledge.

Estok, Simon C. (2013b). Ecocriticism in an age of terror. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 15(1), 2-9 doi:10.7771/1481-4374.2182

Forczyk, Robert. (2009). Leningrad 1941-44: The epic siege. Great Britain: Osprey Publishing Ltd.

Fromm, Harold, Michelle Balaev & Cheryll Glotfelty. (2012). Ecocriticims growth and diversity. Modern Language Association, 127(4), 1016-1020.

Garrard, Greg. (2004). Ecocriticism. London & New York: Routledge.

Glantz, David M. (2001). The siege of Leningrad 1941-1944: 900 days of terror. Kent: Spellmount Ltd.

Glotfelty, Cheryll & Harold Fromm. (1996). The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology. U.S.A.: The University of Georgia Press.

Heise, Ursula K. (2013). Globality, difference, and the international turn in ecocriticism. Modern Language Association, 128(3), 636-643.

Huggan, Graham & Helen Tiffin. (2010). Postcolonial ecocriticism. London & New York: Routledge.

Huggan, Graham and Helen Tiffin. (2007). Green postcolonialism. Interventions: International journal of postcolonial studies, 9(1), 1-11. doi:10.1080/13698010601173783

Longenecker, George. (2013). The siege of Leningrad. Atlanta Review, 19(2), 14.

Marshall, Ian. (2005). New connections in ecocriticism. Interdisciplinary literary studies, 7(1), 1-4.

McClosky, Molly. (2003, September 27). Food for thought in the midst of famine. The Irish Times. Retrieved on June 19, 2019, from https://www.irishtimes.com/news/food-for-thought-in-the-midst-of-famine-1.379215

Oppermann, Serpil. (2011). Ecocriticisms theoretical discontent. Mosaic, 44(2), 153-169.

Salisbury, Harrison E. (1985). The 900 days: The siege of Leningrad. U.S.A.: Da Capo Press.

Walder, Dennis. (2011). Postcolonial nostalgias: Writing, representation, and memory. U.S.A: Routledge.

Svalbard global seed vault. (2008). Retrieved on June 19, 2019, from https://www.seedvault.no/

Waage, Fred, Michelle Balaev & Harold Fromm. (2013). Ecocriticisms past and future. Modern Language Association, 128(3), 778-781.

Hunger. (2003). Retrieved on June 19, 2019, from https://eliseblackwell.com/hunger

Seed savers exchange. (2019). Retrieved on June 19, 2019, from https://www.seedsavers.org/mission




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v3i2.2184

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Lestari Manggong




Indexed and abstracted in:

 

         

 

IJHS Sinta 3 Certificate (S3 = Level 3)

International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) has been nationally accredited Sinta 3 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 4 No 1, 2020 till Vol 8 No 2, 2024

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

p-ISSN: 2597-470X (since 31 August 2017); e-ISSN: 2597-4718 (since 31 August 2017)

Flag Counter

International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) is a scientific journal in English published twice a year, namely in September and March, by Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

 

Note: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the editorial team or publishers.