IDENTITY AND SELF-PRESENTATION IN LETTERS OF REQUEST WRITTEN BY COLLEGE STUDENTS

Maria Corazon Saturnina Aspeli Castro(1*),

(1) University of the Philippines
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Participants in an interaction risk their sense of face in every action (Goffman, 1967). Requests, by definition, are face-threatening acts (Brown and Levinson, 1978). In making a request, a speaker not only threatens the hearers negative face as he impinges on the hearers claim to freedom of action; he also threatens his positive face as he exposes himself to the possibility of being denied or rejected. In order to minimize this possibility, the speaker has to present himself in such a way that the hearer would have a positive impression of him. This paper examined letters of request written by students of a university in Metro Manila for noticeable forms of self-presentation. Following Goffmans thesis (1956) that self-presentation is a tangible component of identity, this paper analyzed lexico-syntactic patterns, and impression management strategies utilized by the writers to express their communicative intention (make a request), and construct an identity deemed necessary in attaining the hearers approval.

Keywords


face, request, self-presentation, impression management, identity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barron. (2008). Contrasting requests in Inner Circle Englishes. A study in variational pragmatics. In M. Puetz, and van Aertselaer, J.N. (eds.), Developing contrastive pragmatics: Interlanguage and crosscultural perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.355-402.

Blum-Kulka, S. and Olshtain, E. (1984) Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realisation patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics 5: 196-213.

Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., and Kasper, G. (1989) Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. NJ: Ablex.

Brown, P. and Levinson,S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness. Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56-289.

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Byon, A. (2006) The role of linguistic indirectness and honorifics in achieving linguistic politeness in Korean requests. Journal of Politeness Research 2: 247-276.

Culpeper, J. and Haugh, M. (2014). Pragmatics and the English language. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Dasdalovska, N. et al. (2016). The use of request strategies by EFL Learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 232 55-61.

Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Social Science Research Center.

Goffman, E. (1972). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. London: Penguin Press.

Hassall, T. (1999). Request strategies in Indonesian. Pragmatics 9: 585-606.

Hassall, T. (2003). Requests by Australian learners of Indonesian. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 19031928.

Hendriks, B.C. (2002). More on Dutch Englishplease? Nijmegen University Press.

Jocano, F.L. (2001). Filipino worldview: Ethnography of local knowledge. PUNLAD Research House.

Jones, E and Pittman, E. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation.

J. Suls. Psychological perspectives on the self. 1, 231-262 NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ogiermann, E. (2009). Politeness and indirectness across cultures: A comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian requests. Journal of Politeness Research 5: 189-216.

Reep, D. (2003). Techinical writing. Principles, strategies, and reading. 5thed. NY: Longman.

Rue, Y., and Zhang, G. (2008) Request strategies: A comparative study in Mandarin Chinese and Korean. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Schlenker, B. (1985) The self and social life. McGraw Hill.

Scoot, M.B. and Lyman, S.M. (1960). Accounts. American Psychological Review, 46-62.

Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts An essay in the philosophy of language. London: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. (1975) Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole, and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.

Shively, R. (2011). L2 pragmatic development in study abroad: A longitudinal study of Spanish service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1818-1835.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v2i1.1257

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Maria Corazon Saturnina Aspeli Castro




Indexed and abstracted in:

 

         

 

IJHS Sinta 3 Certificate (S3 = Level 3)

International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) has been nationally accredited Sinta 3 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 4 No 1, 2020 till Vol 8 No 2, 2024

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

p-ISSN: 2597-470X (since 31 August 2017); e-ISSN: 2597-4718 (since 31 August 2017)

Flag Counter

Notice: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the editorial team or publishers.

International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) is a scientific journal in English published twice a year, namely in September and March, by Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.