Produksi Pengetahuan dalam Psikologi Berhampiran Budaya

Augustinus Supratiknya

Abstract


The subject matter of the culturally-turned Psychology is subjectivity. Adopting the postructuralist Lacanian theory of subjectivity, the human subject is the split subject and/or the lacking subject. The dinamics of subjectivity are constituted by the Other’s desire that circulates in the daily life in the form of discourse and affects subjectivity through identification and interpellation. Research in the culturally turned Psychology aims at creating or constructing in the sense of producing (new) knowledge through reading or interpreting phenomena including things, actions, social institutions, social events, various forms of speech including written, visual, oral, and the like, all of which may be treated as social texts in the sense of a world of signifiers that represents certain meanings in the widest sense of the word. Such kind of research may be conceived as a form of cultural criticism; hence it should ultimately create difference or change in the lives of those it serves. Semiotics and discourse analysis are supposed to be the main methodological tools in the culturally-turned Pschology research.


Keywords


Lacanian subjectivity, identification; interpellation; semiotics; discourse analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bailly, L. (2009). Lacan. A beginner’s guide. Oneworld.

Bevir, M. (2009). Anti-foundationalism. Dalam M. Flinders, A. Gamble, C. Hay, & M. Kenny. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of British Politics (h. 115-137). Oxford University Press.

Billig, M. (2009). Discursive psychology, rhetoric and the issue of agency. Semen, 27, 187-184.

Bowman, P. (2015). Postructuralism. Dalam G. Mazzoleni (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of political communication (h. 1-5). John Wiley & Sons.

Bracher, M. (1993). Lacan, discourse, and social change. A psychoanalytic cultural criticism. Cornell University Press.

Choat, S. (2015). Poststructuralism. Dalam M.T. Gibbons (Ed.), The encyclopedia of political thought (1st ed., 1-9). John Wiley & Sons.

Fink, B. (1995). The Lacanian subject. Between language and jouissance. Princeton Universsity Press.

Goble, F.G. (1987). Mazhab ketiga. Psikologi humanistik Abraham Maslow. Kanisius.

Hawkes, T. (2003). Structuralism and semiotics (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Hénault, A. (2010). The Saussurean heritage. Dalam Paul Cobley (Ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics (h. 101-117). Routledge.

Homer, S. (2005). Jacques Lacan. Routledge.

Malmqvist, L. (n.d.). Essentially constructed. On anti-essentialism and social construvtionism in contemporary anthropology. Unpublished paper. University of Lund.

McCormick, C. (2007). Postructuralism. Dalam G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology (h. 1-5). John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosp075

McNamee, S. (2016). Althusser with Lacan: Ideological interpellation and its interpretation. Makalah, tidak dipublikasikan.

Nordtug, B. (2004). Subjectivity as an unlimited semiosis: Lacan and Peirce. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 23, 87-102.

Rabaté, Jean-Michel. (2003). Preface. Dalam Jean-Michel Rabaté (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Lacan (h. xi-xv). Cambridge University Press.

Sheridan, A. (Tr., 2001). Jacques Lacan. Ecrits. A selection. Routledge.

Stavrakakis, Y. (1999). Lacan and the political. Routledge.

Stavakrakis, (2006). Jacques Lacan (1901-1981). Dalam J. Simons (Ed.), Contemporary critical theorists. From Lacan to Said (h. 18-33). Edinburgh.

“Structuralism” (n.d.), diunduh dari https://www.philosophybasics.com/movement_structuralism.html

“Subject matter of Psychology: An overview” (n.d.), diunduh dari https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/kpupsyc1100/chapter/history-of-psychology/

Supratiknya, A. (1993). Pengantar. Dalam Calvin S. Hall & Gardner Lindzey, Psikologi kepribadian 1. Teori-teori psikodinamik (Klinis) (h. 5-13). Penerbit Kanisius.

Supratiknya, A. (2023). Dari psikologi kritis dan psikologi kultural-historis ke psikologi berhampiran budaya. Retorik, 11(1), 75-107. DOI: 10.24071/ret.v11i1.6360

Wajcman, G. (2003). The hysteric discourse. The Symptom, 4.

Zheng, Yanqing. (2016). An analysis of essentialism and anti-essentialism in literature. Advances on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 40, 339-342.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/suksma.v5i2.8391

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Web Analytics

View My Stats