Email this article ARBOREAL POETICS IN HOWARD NEMEROVS THE THOUGHT OF TREES AND LUIS H. FRANCIAS LESSONS OF A TREE
Abstract
This paper discusses arboreal poetics in two contemporary poems The Thought of Trees by Howard Nemerov, an American poet and Lessons of a Tree by Luis H. Francia, a Filipino one. The objectives of this research are first to identify how Nemerov and Francias vegetal poetics conveys ecological views; second, how their vegetal poetics evokes ones ecological awareness to conserve biodiversity and to consume material goods sufficiently. These behaviors help to reduce the exacerbation of climate change phenomenon. This research used qualitative methods, in which the data were words and taken from the two poems and from several sources on trees, climate change, ecopoetry as a kind of criticism belonging to environmental humanities. The result shows that both poems anthropomorphize trees as indispensably interconnected and coexistent with any life forms and the physical environment. This further impacts on humans growing ecological conscience not to objectify but to conserve vegetation in particular and other natural resources in general through his sufficient consumption of the material goods for ones living necessities.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bennett, M. (2003). From wide open spaces to metropolitan places: The urban challenge to ecocriticism. In Michael P. Branch & Scott Slovic (Eds.), The ISLE Reader: Ecocriticism, 1993-2003 (pp. 296-317). Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press.
Bryson, J. S. (2005). The west side of any mountain: Place, space, and ecopoetry. University of Iowa Press.
Buell, L. (1993). The American transcendentalist poets. In Jay Parini & Brett C. Millier (Eds.), The columbia history of american poetry (pp. 97-120). New York: Columbia University Press.
Coleridge, S. T. (2008). The dialectic of mind and nature. In Laurence Coupe (Ed.), Jonathan Bate (transl.), The green studies reader: From romanticism to ecocriticism (pp. 21-22). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Davidson, I. (2007). Ideas of space in contemporary poetry. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Drake, F. (2000). Global warming: The science of climate change. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ehrlich, P., & Ehrlich, A. (1981). Extinction: The causes and consequences of the disappearance of species. New York: Random House.
Elder, J. (1985). Imagining the earth: Poetry and the vision of nature. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Felstiner, J. (2009). Can poetry save the earth?: A field guide to nature poems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Francia, L. H. (2014). Tattered boat. Diliman, Quezon City: The University of the Philippines Press.
Gagliano, M., Ryan, J. C., & Vieira, Pa. (2017). Introduction. In Monica Gagliano, John C. Ryan, & Patricia Vieira (Eds.), The language of plants: science, philosophy, literature (pp. vii-xxxiii). Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.
Glotfelty, C. (1996). Literary studies in an age of environmental crisis. In Cheryll Glotfelty & Harold Fromm (Eds.), The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology (pp. xv-xxxvii). Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press.
Gorte, R. W., & Pervaze, A. S. (2010). Deforestation and climate change. Washington, DC: CRS Report for Congress.
Hanh, T. N. (1990). The last tree. In Allan Hunt Badiner (Ed.), Dharma
gaia: A harvest of essays in buddhism and ecology (pp. 217-221). CA: Parallax Press.
Hass, R. (2013). American ecopoetry: An introduction. In Ann Fisher-Wirth & Laura-Gray Street (Eds.), The ecopoetry anthology (pp. xli-lxv). San Antonio, TX: Trinity University Press.
Howarth, W. (1996). Some principles of ecocriticism. In Cheryll Glotfelty & Harold Fromm (Eds.), The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology (pp. 69-91). Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press.
Kaza, S. (2010). How much is enough? Buddhist perspectives on consumerism. In Richard K. Payne (Ed.), How much is enough? Buddhism, consumerism, and the human environment (pp. 39-61). Somerville, MA: Wisdom Publications.
Kern, R. (2003). Ecocriticism: What is it good for?. In Michael P. Branch & Scott Slovic (Eds.), The ISLE reader: ecocriticism, 1993-2003 (pp. 258-281). Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press.
Koizumi, T. (2010). The noble eightfold path as a prescription for sustainable living. In Richard K. Payne (Ed.), How much is enough? Buddhism, consumerism, and the human environment (pp. 133-145). Somerville, MA: Wisdom Publications.
Leonard, A., & Conrad, A. (2011). The story of stuff: The impact of overconsumption on the planet, our communities, and our healthAnd how we can make it better. New York: Free Press.
Leopold, A. (2013). The land ethic. In Curt Meine (Ed.), A sand county almanac & other writings on ecology and conservation (pp. 171-189). New York: The Library of America.
Mann, A.T. (2012). The sacred language of trees. New York: Sterling Ethos.
Morton, T. (2010). The ecological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nelson, T. (1982). Genesis 6 the ark prepared. The holy bible new king james version. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers.
Nemerov, H. (1977). The collected poems of howard nemerov. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Pease, D. (1993). Walt whitmans revisionary democracy. In Jay Parini & Brett C. Millier (Eds.), The columbia history of american poetry (pp. 148-171). New York: Columbia University Press.
Pittock, A. B. (2005). Climate change: Turning up the heat. Collingwood, VIC Australia: CSIRO Publishing.
Rueckert, W. (1996). Literature and ecology: An experiment in ecocriticism. In Cheryll Glotfelty & Harold Fromm (Eds.), The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology (pp. 105-123). Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press.
Siewers, A. K. (2011). Ecopoetics and the origins of english literature. In Stephanie LeMenager, Teresa Shewry, Ken Hiltner (Eds.), Environmental criticism for the twenty-first century (pp. 105-120). New York: Routledge. Retrieved from libgen. rus
Slovic, S. (2008). Ecocriticism: Containing multitudes, practising doctrine. In Laurence Coupe (Ed.), Jonathan Bate (Foreword), The green studies reader: From romanticism to ecocriticism (pp. 160-162). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Snyder, G. (1978). Myths & texts. New York: New Directions Books.
--------------(1990). The Place, the region, and the commons. In The practice of the wild (pp. 27-51). Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint.
Steiner, R. (2008). Plants and elemental nature spirits. In Matthew Barton (Ed.), Spiritual ecology: Reading the book of nature and reconnecting with the world (pp. 88-89). Forest Row, UK: Rudolf Steiner Press.
Tudge, C. (2005). The tree: A natural history of what trees are, how they live, and why they matter. New York: Three Rivers Press.
Turner, I.M. (2004). The growing tree. In The ecology of trees in the tropical rain forest (pp. 15-20). New York: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from libgen.rus
Weis, J. S. (2015). Marine debris. In Marine pollution: What everyone needs to know (pp. 42-62). New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from libgen.rus
Wilson, E. O. (2016). Half-earth: Our planets fight for life. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v3i2.2221
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Henrikus Joko Yulianto
Indexed and abstracted in:
IJHS Sinta 3 Certificate (S3 = Level 3)
International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) has been nationally accredited Sinta 3 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 4 No 1, 2020 till Vol 8 No 2, 2024
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
p-ISSN: 2597-470X (since 31 August 2017); e-ISSN: 2597-4718 (since 31 August 2017)
International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) is a scientific journal in English published twice a year, namely in September and March, by Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Note: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the editorial team or publishers.