IDENTITY AND SELF-PRESENTATION IN LETTERS OF REQUEST WRITTEN BY COLLEGE STUDENTS
(1) University of the Philippines
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barron. (2008). Contrasting requests in Inner Circle Englishes. A study in variational pragmatics. In M. Puetz, and van Aertselaer, J.N. (eds.), Developing contrastive pragmatics: Interlanguage and crosscultural perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.355-402.
Blum-Kulka, S. and Olshtain, E. (1984) Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realisation patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics 5: 196-213.
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., and Kasper, G. (1989) Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. NJ: Ablex.
Brown, P. and Levinson,S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness. Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56-289.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Byon, A. (2006) The role of linguistic indirectness and honorifics in achieving linguistic politeness in Korean requests. Journal of Politeness Research 2: 247-276.
Culpeper, J. and Haugh, M. (2014). Pragmatics and the English language. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dasdalovska, N. et al. (2016). The use of request strategies by EFL Learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 232 55-61.
Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Social Science Research Center.
Goffman, E. (1972). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. London: Penguin Press.
Hassall, T. (1999). Request strategies in Indonesian. Pragmatics 9: 585-606.
Hassall, T. (2003). Requests by Australian learners of Indonesian. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 19031928.
Hendriks, B.C. (2002). More on Dutch Englishplease? Nijmegen University Press.
Jocano, F.L. (2001). Filipino worldview: Ethnography of local knowledge. PUNLAD Research House.
Jones, E and Pittman, E. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation.
J. Suls. Psychological perspectives on the self. 1, 231-262 NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ogiermann, E. (2009). Politeness and indirectness across cultures: A comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian requests. Journal of Politeness Research 5: 189-216.
Reep, D. (2003). Techinical writing. Principles, strategies, and reading. 5thed. NY: Longman.
Rue, Y., and Zhang, G. (2008) Request strategies: A comparative study in Mandarin Chinese and Korean. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Schlenker, B. (1985) The self and social life. McGraw Hill.
Scoot, M.B. and Lyman, S.M. (1960). Accounts. American Psychological Review, 46-62.
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts An essay in the philosophy of language. London: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. (1975) Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole, and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.
Shively, R. (2011). L2 pragmatic development in study abroad: A longitudinal study of Spanish service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1818-1835.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v2i1.1257
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Maria Corazon Saturnina Aspeli Castro
Indexed and abstracted in:
IJHS Sinta 3 Certificate (S3 = Level 3)
International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) has been nationally accredited Sinta 3 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 4 No 1, 2020 till Vol 8 No 2, 2024
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
p-ISSN: 2597-470X (since 31 August 2017); e-ISSN: 2597-4718 (since 31 August 2017)
International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) is a scientific journal in English published twice a year, namely in September and March, by Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Note: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the editorial team or publishers.