Framing and Group Polarisation in Hate Speeches in Nigeria

Justus Chidi Ugwu, Obiageli C. Nnnamani

Abstract


Since the Nigerian Civil War in 1970, there has been a mutual suspicion among its three major ethnic groups, Hausa (in the North), Igbo (East) and Yoruba (West). This is not only manifest in their socio-political life but has also generated strife and hate speech, typified by context-sensitive strategies. This paper highlights the key group-motivated strategies of framing and polarisation utilized in the hate speeches raised by different groups in the Nigerian political discourse. The 2017 Kaduna declaration by a northern union (Arewa Youths), threatening to evict the Igbo living in the northern region, and response texts from other unions to the declaration constitute the data. These were subjected to content analysis with insights from van Dijk’s Ideological Representation and Halliday and Matthiessen’s Transitivity Theory. The findings reveal a self-preservationist frame, which is polarised in the Self/Other pattern.


Keywords


frames, hate speech, Nigeria, polarization, self/other discourse

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ajiboye, E., & Odebunmi, A. (2015). Language, context and society: A theoretical anchorage. In A. Odebunmi & A. Kehinde (Eds.), Language, context and society: A Festschrift for wale adegbite (pp. 33-36). Ibadan: Obafemi Awolowo University Press.

Aneke, L.N. (2007). The untold story of the Nigerian-Biafran war. New York: Triumph Publishing.

Arofah, K. (2018). Rhetorical analysis of hate speech: Case study of hate speech related to Ahok’s religion blasphemy case. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 11(1), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v11i1.3119

Balliet, D., Wu, J., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2014). Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1556–1581. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037737

Brown, A. (2017). What is so special about online (as compared to offline) hate speech? Ethnicities, 18(3), 297–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796817709846

Cohen-Almagor, R. (2011). Speech, media, and ethics: The limits of free expression. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501829

Duruji, M.M. (2009). Social inequality, democratic transition and the igbo nationalism resurgence in Nigeria. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 3(1), 54-56.

Gagliardone, I., Patel, A., & Pohjonen, M. (2014). Mapping and analyzing hate speech online: Opportunities and challenges for Ethiopia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.

Iginio, J. (2017). Five ways to counter hate speech in the media. Retrieved from from https://en.unesco.org/5-ways-to-counter-hate-speech

Ikeanyibe, O.M., Ezeibe, C.C., Mbah, P.O., & Nwangwu, C. (2017). Political campaign and democratisation: Interrogating the use of hate speech in the 2011 and 2015 general elections in Nigeria. Journal of Language and Politics, 17(1), 92–117. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16010.ike

Jameson, F. (1976). Reading Goffman’s frame analysis. Theory and Society, 3, 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158482

Jubany, O. (2015). Background, experiences and response to online hate speech: A comparative cross-country analysis. Paper presented at the 2nd Annual International Conference on Social Science and Contemporary Humanity Development (SSCHD 2016). Atlantis Press.

Kaminskaya, E., & Church, T. (2014). Hate speech: Theory and issues.

Kareem, O. (2018). Online communication.

Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate: The essential guide for progressives. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.

Littlejohn, S.W. (1977). Symbolic interactionism as an approach to the study of human communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 63(1), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637709383369

Mafeza, F. (2016). Preventing genocide by fighting against hate speech. International Journal of Advanced Research, 4(3),117-132.

Massaro, T.M. (1991). Equality and freedom of expression: The hate speech dilemma. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2584632

Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. Winston (ed.), The Psychology of computer vision (pp. 211-277). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Musa, A., & Ferguson, N. (2013). Enemy framing and the politics of reporting religious conflicts in the Nigerian press. Media War and Conflicts, 6(1), 7-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635212469909

Nawata, K., & Yamaguchi, H. (2014). Perceived group identity of out-group members and anticipated rejection: People think that strongly identified group members reject non-group members. Japanese Psychological Research, 56 (4), 297–308.

Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221–246. http://www.jstor.org/stable/586517

Neshkova, S., & Trajkova, Z. (2014). The essentials of hate speech. International Journal of Education Teacher, 14(10), 63-72.

Ojukwu, C.C. (2009). Igbo nation, modern statecraft and the geopolitics of national survival in a multiethnic nation. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 3(5), 182–190.

Okoro, N., & Odoemelam, C.C. (2013). Print media framing of Boko Haram insurgency in Nigeria: A content analytical study of the Guardian, Daily Sun, Vanguard and Thisday newspapers. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(11), 1-10.

Patricia, C., & Ojomo, O. (2015). Television webcast framing of the Nigerian government’s response to Boko Haram insurgency in North-east Nigeria. Singaporean Journal of Business Economics, and Management Studies, 4(9), 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.12816/0019682

Pluwak, A. (2011). The linguistic aspect of strategic framing in modern political campaigns. Cognitive Studies, 11, 307-319. https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.2011.019

Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Semino, E., Demjén, Z., & Demmen, J. (2018). An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse and practice with an application to metaphors for cancer. Applied Linguistics, 39(5), 625–645, https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw028

Smolla, R. (2008). Academic freedom, hate speech and the idea of a university. Law and Contemporary Problems, 53(3), 195-255.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & G. Austin (eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

Terfa, T.A., Philip, H.F., & Junatu, M. (2017). Audience perception of hate speech and foul language in the social media in Nigeria: Implications for morality and law. Academicus International Scientific Journal, 15, 166-183.

The Council of Europe. (2012). Mapping study on projects against hate speech online. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/t/dg4/youth/Source/Training-courses/2012-Mapping_projects_against_Hate_Speech

Turner, J. (1980). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: Is being a member of the out-group an advantage? British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01091.x

Uwalaka, J. (2003). The struggles for an inclusive Nigeria: Igbos to be or not to be. Enugu: SNAAPPress.

van Dijk, T.A. (1995). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. Language and Peace, 17, 33-48.

van Dijk, T.A. (2006a). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse and Society, 17(2), 359-383.

van Dijk, T.A. (2006b). Politics, ideology, and discourse, 728-740. Retrieved from https://discourses.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Teun-A.-van-Dijk-2006-Politics-ideology-discourse.pdf

Virginia, O., & Olanrewaju, A.T. (2017). A speech act analysis of hate speeches in 2015 general election campaign speeches in Nigeria. International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature, 5(6), 61-72.

Weisel, O., & Bohm, R. (2015). In-group love and out-group hate in inter-group conflict. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 110-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.008

Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about—A summary of its history, important concepts and its development. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 3-16). London: Sage Publications Ltd.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijels.v9i2.6191

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


    

 

IJELS Journal Sinta 4 Certificate (S4 = Level 4)

We would like to inform you that Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS) has been nationally accredited Sinta 4 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 152/E/KPT/2023. Validity for 5 years: Vol 7 No 2, 2021 till Vol 12 No 1, 2026

 

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

 

IJELS e-ISSN 2715-0895; IJELS p-ISSN 2442-790X

Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS) is published twice a year, namely in March and September, by the English Language Studies (ELS) of the Graduate Program of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.