Examining Interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary Work Is Not Always Good

Dominikus Sukristiono(1*),

(1) Universitas Sanata Dharma
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


In addition to novelty and relevance, interdisciplinarity seems to be an imperative predicate in the scientific works carried out in Indonesia. Unfortunately, research on the interdisciplinarity itself, particularly from the perspective of philosophy of science, either descriptive or normative, i.e., what and how interdisciplinary has been (and should be) done is still a desideratum. Through database and normative-philosophical analysis, this article shows that most of the interdisciplinary works hitherto carried out are either additive or interpretative/take-over in nature. Such works would be bad scientific practices. Good interdisciplinary works presuppose the existence of interdisciplinary material objects and their formal ones. These normative requirements, however, lead to a dilemma which should be faced by those who work interdisciplinarily.


Keywords


database analysis; interdisciplinarity; normative requirements; research on interdisciplinarity



DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ret.v11i2.7494

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Dominikus Sukristiono

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Retorik: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora is published by the Graduate Program in Cultural Studies at Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Retorik is also available in print edition. Please click here for contact information.

  • santuy4d
  • slot pulsa
  • mariatogel
  • garudaslot
  • slot thailand
  • depobos
  • slot gacor malam ini