PENGEMBANGAN ALAT PERAGA MATEMATIKA BERBASIS METODE MONTESSORI PAPAN DAKON OPERASI BILANGAN BULAT UNTUK SISWA SD
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to develop and validate a learning media called Papan Dakon for integer operations based on Montessori method for elementary school students especially for the fourth graders. This research was conducted through a collaboration of four researches: research and development (R&D), quasi-experiment, survey, and qualitative research. The subject of this research was approximately 53 students and one teacher from two schools in Yogyakarta. The result showed that 1) the process of developing learning media ran gradually, step 1 was to develop eight learning media based on Montessori methods, and step 2 was to validate the media, and the last step was revision of the product; 2) the learning media were effective. It showed from the improvement of students learning achievement, the satisfaction level of the students and their teacher in enough satisfy category, and the relatively positive perception of the users toward the learning meadia Papan Dakon. Recomendattion for the future research included determining the exact number of the students who would be involved in experiemntal study, providing sistematic and organized schedule, considering the production capacity, and adding the number of schools in the try out phase in order to increase the number of product users.
Keyword: learning media, Montessori, papan dakon, satisfaction, perception.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ardeta, Y. T. E. 2014. Perbedaan Prestasi Belajar Siswa atas Penggunaan Alat Peraga Matematika Berbasis Metode Montessori (Skripsi tidak dipublikasikan). Universitas Sanata Dharma, Yogyakarta.
Borg, W. R. & Gall, M. D. 1983. Educational Research, an Introduction, Fourth Edition. New York: Longman.
Chang, M. C. dkk. 2014. Teacher Reform in Indonesia: The Role of Politics and Evidence in Policy Making. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
Dewey, J. 1944. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: The Free Press.
Douglas, J. D., A & Barnes, B. 2006. Measuring Student Satisfaction at a UK University. Quality Assurance in Education 14 (3): 251-267.
Hastuti, K. S. 2014. Tingkat Kepuasan Siswa dan Guru terhadap Penggunaan Alat Peraga Matematika Berbasis Metode Montessori (Untuk Penjumlahan dan Pengurangan Pecahan pada Kelas IV SD Karitas) (Skripsi tidak Dipublikasikan). Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Hergenhahn, B. R. & Olson, M. H. 2009. Theories of Learning (Edisi Ketujuh). Jakarta: Kencana.
Holt, H. 2008. The Absorbent Mind, Pikiran yang Mudah Menyerap. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Lillard, P. P. 1997. Montessori in the classroom. New York: Schocken Books.
Lillard, P. P. 2005. Montessori: The Science Behind the Genius. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lillard, A. & Else-Quest, N. 2006. Evaluating Montessori education. Science, AAAS Journal. Education Forum, 313, 1893-1894.Diakses dari www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/313/5795/1893/DC1.
Manner, J. C. 2007. Montessori vs. Traditional Education in the Public Sector: Seeking Appropriate Comparisons of Academic Achievement. Forum on Public Policy: A Journal of the Oxford Round Table. Gale Education, Religion and Humanities Lite Package. Diakses dari http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA191817971&v=2.1&u=k pt05011&it=r&p=GPS&sw=w
Montessori, M. 2002. The Montessori method. New York: Dover Publications.
OECD 2010, PISA 2009 Results: Executive Summary.
OECD 2013, PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Volume I), PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en
Poerwandari, K. 1998. Pendekatan Kualitatif untuk Penelitian Perilaku Manusia. Jakarta: Lembaga Pengembangan Sarana Pengukuran dan Pendidikan Psikologi (LPSP3). Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia.
Programme for International Student Assessment. What students know and can do: Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science (2009). Diakses dari http://www.oecd.org/pisa/46643496.pdf
Rakhmat, J, 2003. Psikologi komunikasi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Rathunde, K. 2003. A comparison of Montessori and Traditional Middle Schools: Motivation, Quality of Experience, and Social Context. The NAMTA Journal 28.3:15-20. Diakses dari http://www.m o n t e s s o r i - n a m t a . o r g / P D F /rathundecompar.pdf
Ratri, A. R. 2014. Pengembangan Alat Peraga Matematika Berbasis Metode Montessori untuk Operasi Bilangan Bulat di SDK Klepu Yogyakarta (Skripsi tidak dipublikasikan). Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Rowley, J. (2003). Designing Student Feedback Questionnaires. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(3): 142-149.
Sari, P. R. 2014. Persepsi Guru dan Siswa terhadap Alat Peraga Bilangan Bulat Berbasis Metode Montessori (Skripsi tidak Dipublikasikan). Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Suharnan. 2005. Psikologi Kognitif. Surabaya: Srikandi.
Sukardjo. 2008. Kumpulan Materi Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Prodi Teknologi Pembelajaran, Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Thoha, M. 1996. Perilaku Organisasi, Konsep dasar dan aplikasinya. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Tim Penyusun. 2008. Kamus Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI). Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Tjiptono, A., & Diana, A. 2003. Total quality manajemen. Edisi revisi. Yogyakarta: Andy.
Toth, Z. E., Jonas, T., Berces, R., & Bedzsula, B. 2010. Course Evaluation by Importance-Performance Analysis and Improving Actions at the Budapest University of Technology and Economics. Paper presented developed in the framework of the project Talent care and cultivation in the scientific workshops of BME project. This project is suppor ted by the grant TMOP - 4.2.2.B-10/12010-0009
ltanir, E. 2012. An epistemological glance at the constructivist approach: Constructivist learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. International Journal of Instruction, 5 (2), 195-212.
Umar, H. 1997. Study kelayakan bisnis. Edisi ketiga. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.