CURRICULUM REFORM IN SCHOOLS: THE INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY INTO ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING

Pius N. Prihatin(1*),

(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study is a case study to explore how EFL teachers integrate computer technology into the instruction as a respond to a curriculum reform effort. The focus was the teachers views on factors affecting their use of computer technologies in the classroom. The researcher used case study method that involved three participants. From the qualitative analysis method the researcher found four themes that describe teachers use of technology in EFL classroom. Those are alignment with the hardware capacity, different teaching strategies, management of time, and expectation for better computer integration. The findings indicated that the implementation of strategies requires teachers to consider about all aspects connected to the integration of technology into the curriculum. The findings of this instrumental case study contribute to the understanding of factors affecting the integration of computers into the curriculum that provides insight into better practice of the utilization of technology into English language teaching.


Key words : Curriculum reform, Technology integration, Case study


Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Jar f, R.S. 2004. The ef fects of web-based learning on struggling efl learning college writers. Foreign Language Annals, 37(1), 49-57.

Anderson, R. & Ronnkvist, A. 1999. The presence of computers in American schools. Retrieved September 20, 2009, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/computers_in_american _schools/.

Bauer, J. & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: why it isnt happening, Technology and Teacher Education. 13(4), 519-546.

Bogdan, R.C. & Biklen, S.K. 1998. Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Boling, E.C. 2008. Learning from teachers conceptions of technology integration: what do blogs, instant messages, and 3d chat rooms have to do with it?, Research in the teaching of English, 43(1), 74-100

Borko, H. & Putnam, R. T. 1996. Learning to teach. In D. C Berliner, & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673-708). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

Chiu, C.Y. 2008. The discourse of an English teacher in a cyber writing course: Roles and autonomy. The Asian EFL Journal, 10, 79-110.

Creswell, J. W. 1998. Qualitative inquir y and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

De la Fuente, M.J. 2003. Is SLA interactionist theor y relevant to call? A study on the effects of computer-mediated interaction in L2 vocabular y acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(1), 47-81.

Elmore, R.F. 2002. Bridging the gap between standards and achievement: The imperative of professional development in education, Washington, DC: Alber tShanker Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.shankerinstitute.org/education.html.

Hart, H, Allensworth, E, Lauen, D, & Gladden, R 2002. Educational technology: Availability and use in Chicago. Consor tium on Chicago School Research, NA, Retrieved September 20, 2009, from http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/publications/p56.pdf.

Kearsley, G. & Shneiderman, B. 1998. Engagement theory: A framework for technology based teaching and lear ning. Educationa Technology, 38(5), 20-23.

Keengwe, J. 2007. Faculty integration of technology into instruction and students perceptions of computer technology to improve student learning, Journal of infor mation technology education, 6, 169-179.

Kim, H. K. & Rissel, D. 2008. Instr uctors integration of computer technology: examining the role of interaction. Foreign language annals. 41, 61-80.

Lee, L. 2002. Synchronous online exchanges: A study of modification devices on nonnative discourse. System, 30(3), 275-288.

McNeil, J.D. 2009. Contemporary curriculum: In thought and action (7th Ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Meskill, C. 1992. Off-screen talk and CALL: Role of the machine/par ticipant. CAELL Journal, 3(1), 2-9.

Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods, 2M ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Stake, R. E. 1995. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Tudini, V. 2004. Virtual immersion: Native speaker chats as a bridge to conversational Italian. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Series S, 18, 63-80.

Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., Byers, J. 2002. Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104,

-515.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
slot gacor slot