English Language Teachers' Knowledge, Use, and Perceived Effectiveness of Action Research for Professional Development
(1) Graduate School of Education Tribhuvan University, Nepal
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
In light of evolving pedagogical frameworks and increasing challenges in English Language Teaching (ELT), effective professional development is essential for teachers striving to enhance their practices. Action research is a pivotal strategy for teachers' professional development, fostering an adaptive learning environment through reflective pedagogy. While teachers have implemented action research, its engagement among secondary-level English language teachers remains underexplored, particularly regarding their knowledge, use, and perceptions of its role in professional growth. The study aimed to identify secondary-level English language teachers’ knowledge, use, and perceived effectiveness of action research as a tool for professional development. The research employed a quantitative survey approach, focusing on English language teachers in private and public schools in Nepal, with a particular emphasis on those in the Sunsari district. A sample of 200 teachers was selected using a simple random sampling strategy, and a structured questionnaire was administered online via Google Forms. The collected data were analyzed using a bivariate analysis approach with SPSS. A chi-square test was conducted to assess the association between the variables, while Phi was employed to determine the significance of these relationships. The study examined the association between independent variables (such as sex, level of teaching, type of school, and academic qualification) and dependent variables (including use of action research, knowledge of action research, and perceived effectiveness of action research). The findings indicated no significant statistical association between the independent and dependent variables. However, the study concluded that the majority of teachers perceived action research as valuable for problem-solving, increasing professional confidence, promoting career advancement, fostering transformative agency, and enhancing teacher collaboration. It suggests that teachers could benefit from more effectively integrating action research into their teaching practices for professional development and transformation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allwright, D. (2019). The role of action research in teacher professional development. Journal of Educational Research, 112(4), 456-468.
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Burns, A. (2005). Action research: An evolving paradigm? Language Teaching, 38(2), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444805002661.
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539.
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education Inc.
Curry, L. A., Nembhard, I. M., & Bradley, E. H. (2009). Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation, 119(10), 1442-1452. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.742775.
Danielson, C. & McGreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning. The Falmer Press.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2015). Promoting teacher reflection in second language education: A framework for TESOL professionals. Routledge.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2019). Reflection as action in ELT. TESOL International publications.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2022). Reflective practice in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Fullan, M. (1995). The limits and the potential of professional development. In T. Guskey & M. Herbman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices. Teachers College Press.
Government of Nepal, (2000). Teacher service commission rules, 2057 (2000). Nepal Gazette.
Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J. Jr., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey methodology. John Wiley and Sons.
Han, L. (2017). Analysis of the problems in language teachers’ action research. International Education Studies, 10(11), 123-128.https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n11p123.
Hei, K. C., & David, M. K. (2017). Empowering language teachers through action research: Two case studies from Malaysia. English Review: Journal of English Education, 5(2), 163-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v5i2.532.
Hernández, A. G. S. & Mejía, E. J. B. Z. (2022). Socio-affective strategies for reducing foreign language anxiety levels in university students. Educateconciencia, 30(37), 111-129. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368232120_Socio-affective_strategies_for_reducing_foreign_language_anxiety_levels_in_university_students.
Jaipal, K. & Figg, C. (2011). Collaborative action research approaches promoting professional development for elementary school teachers. Educational Action Research, 19(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2011.547688.
Johnson, A. P. (2021). A short guide to action research. Pearson.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner. Deakin University Press.
Kijkuakul, S. (2019). Professional changes of primary science teachers: Experience on collaborative action research in Thailand. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0030-2.
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x.
May-Melendez, R., Balderas-Garza, M., Alcocer-Vazquez, E., & Quijano-Zavala, G. (2019). Reflective journal: The learners’ perspective in formal instruction. European Scientific Journal, 15(10), 160-252. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2019.v15n10p252.
McNiff, J. (2009). You and your action research. Routledge.
McNiff, J. (2017). Action research: All you need to know. Routledge.
Meesuk, P., Sramoon, B., & Wongrugsa, A. (2020). Classroom action research-based instruction: The sustainable teacher professional development strategy. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 22(1), 98-110. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2020-0008.
Mills, G. E. (2003). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Merrill Prentice Hall.
Pandey, G. P. (2024). Advancing English language teaching through survey research: Methodologies impacts and applications. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (NJMR), 7(2), 127-141. https://doi.org/10.3126/njmr.v7i2.68254.
Peralta-Castro, F., & Mayoral-Valdivia, P, J. (2018). Language teachers improving their practice and generating knowledge through action research. Global research in higher education, 2(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.22158/grhe.v2n1p1.
Pham, T. H., Huynh-Lam, A. C., & Nguyen, V. (2021). Perceptions of high school administrators, teachers, and staff on their educational action research skills. JETT, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.47750/jett.2021.12.04.007.
Prudente, M. & Aguja, S. (2018). Principles, attitudes and processes in doing action research: perceptions of teachers from the Philippines. Advanced Science Letters, 24(11), 8007-8010.https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12478.
Puspitasari, Y., Widiati, U., Marhaban, S., Sulistyo, T., & Rofiqoh, R. (2021). The sustainable impacts of teacher action research on EFL teachers in Indonesia. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(3), 952-971.https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i3.21388.
Rauteda, K. R. (2023). Teacher training as a strategy of professional development: Perceptions and challenges. Journal of NELTA Gandaki, 6(1-2), 98-108. https://doi.org/10.3126/jong.v6i1-2.59716.
Rauteda, K. R. (2024). Bending back to the professional activities: Unveiling the role of reflective practice in teachers’ professional development. Journal of NELTA Gandaki, 7(1-2), 98-110.https://doi.org/10.3126/jong.v7i1-2.70230.
Rauteda, K. R. (2025). Quantitative research in education: Philosophy, uses and limitations. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.56916/jmrd.v2i1.993
Ridwan, A. and Athena, T. (2023). Professional development altogether: Pre-service and in-service EFL teacher collaboration in doing classroom action research. Elsya Journal of English Language Studies, 5(2), 147-158. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v5i2.11929
Rumiantsev, T., van der Rijst, R., Kuiper, W., Verhaar, A., & Admiraal, W. (2023). Teacher professional development and educational innovation through action research in conservatoire education in the Netherlands. British Journal of Music Education, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265051723000414.
Sadeghi, K. & Richards, J. C. (2021). Professional development among English language teachers: Challenges and recommendations for practice. Heliyon, 7(9), e08053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08053.
Saeb, F., S. A., Nejadansari, D., & Moinzadeh, A. (2021). The impact of action research on teacher professional development: Perspectives from Iranian EFL teachers. Teaching English Language, 15(2), 265-297. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.2021.143114.
Sagor, R. (2018). The action research guidebook: A four-stage process for educators and students. Corwin Press.
Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. Basic Books.
Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. Jossey.
Shakhaweti, F. (2014). The effectiveness of total physical response as a classroom management strategy. HCT Press.
Shanks, J., Miller, L., & Rosendale, S. (2012). Action Research in a professional development school setting to support teacher candidate self-efficacy. SRATE Journal, 21(2), 26-32. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ990633.pdf.
Tindowen, D. J., Guzman, J., & Macanang, D. (2019). Teachers’ conception and difficulties in doing action research. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(8), 1787-1794. http://dx.doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070817.
Van, P. T. T. (2020). Employing action research for professional development of EFL college teachers in the Mekong delta, Vietnam. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v7i10.3292.
Vanderlinde, R. & van Braak, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: Views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 299-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902919257.
Vula, E. & Saqipi, B. (2015). Developing action research for developing teachers in Kosovo. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 6(4), 1-21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283621522_Developing_Action_Research_for_Developing_Teachers_in_Kosovo.
Wahlgren, B. & Aarkrog, V. (2020). Bridging the gap between research and practice: How teachers use research-based knowledge. Educational Action Research, 29(1), 118-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1724169.
Zajic, J. O., Mamutovic, A., & Maksimovic, J. (2021). The role of action research in teachers’ professional development. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science Engineering and Education, 9(3), 301-317. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2021-9-3-301-317.
Zeichner, K. & Liston, D.P. (2013). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Routledge.
Zeichner, K. (2003). Teacher research as professional development for P-12 educators in the USA. Educational Action Research, 11(2), 301-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790300200211.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijels.v11i1.11514
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IJELS Journal Sinta 4 Certificate (S4 = Level 4)
We would like to inform you that Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS) has been nationally accredited Sinta 4 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree No. Surat Keputusan 152/E/KPT/2023. Validity for 5 years: Vol 7 No 2, 2021 till Vol 12 No 1, 2026
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
IJELS e-ISSN 2715-0895; IJELS p-ISSN 2442-790X
Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS) is published twice a year, namely in March and September, by the English Language Studies (ELS) of the Graduate Program of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.