ANALYZING THE VALUES AND EFFECTS OF POWERPOINT PRESENTATIONS

K.M. Widi Hadiyanti, Widya Widya

Abstract


PowerPoint Presentation (PPtP) is now quite common in many aspects of life, not only at schools (Yilmazel-Sahin, 2007). It facilitates events in various ways owing to its practicality (Craig & Armenic, 2006). In classes, it provides advantages for both students and teachers, but it may be problematic as well (Davies et al., 2009; Oommen; Taylor, 2012). Therefore, Howard & Conway (1985) recommended verifying if students viewpoints may maximize its contribution for class empowerment. This study focused on how students appreciated the values of PPP and how it affected lecturers. It involved 90 students responding to a questionnaire asking their standpoint about the use of PPP including commentary and suggestion. Results revealed that in general, participants out looked positively towards PPP and its impact to teachers. It aided students and teacher in the learning-teaching process, although it was occasionally blamed as not engaging or even boring.

Keywords


value, effect, PowerPoint Presentation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdellatif, Z. (2015). Exploring students perceptions of using PowerPoint in enhancing their active participation in the EFL classroom: Action research study. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 55, 36-39.

Ahmad, J. (2012). English Language Teaching (ELT) and integration of media technology. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47(2012), 924-929.

Anh, N. T. Q. (2011). Efficacy of PowerPoint presentations: students perception. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of Teaching and Learning (pp. 1-9). Malaysia.

Bartsch, R. A., & Cobern, K. M. (2003). Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Computers & Education, 41(2003), 77-86.

Corbeil, G. (2007). Can PowerPoint presentations effectively replace textbooks and blackboards for teaching grammar? Do students find them an effective learning tool? CALICO Journal, 24(3), 631-656.

Craig, R. J., & Amernic, J. H. (2006). PowerPoint presentation technology and the dynamics of teaching. Innov High Educ, (31), 147-160.

Daniels, L. (1999). Introducing technology in the classroom: PowerPoint as a first step. Journals of Computing in Higher Education, 10(2), 42-46.

Davies, T. L., Lavin, A. M., & Korte, L. (2009). Student perceptions of how technology impacts the quality of instruction and learning. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 2-16.

Fisher, D. L., (2003). Using PowerPoint for ESL teaching. The Internet TESL Journal, 9(4). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Fisher-PowerPoint.html

Frey, B. A., & Birnbaum D. J. (2002). Learners perceptions on the value of PowerPoint in lectures. Education Resources Information Center, 1-9.

Howard, G. S., & Conway, C. G. (1985). Construct validity of measures of college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 187-196.

Khoury, R. M., & Mattar, D. M. (2012). PowerPoint in accounting classrooms: Constructive or destructive? International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(10), 240-259.

King, L. (2010). The science of psychology: An appreciative view. New York: McGraw Hill.

Morgan-Thomas, Maxine. (2014). Acting out in class: the group role-play advantage over PowerPoint presentation. Journal of Legal Studies in Business.

Oommen, A. (2012). Teaching English as a global language in smart classrooms with PowerPoint presentation. English Language Teaching, 5(12), 54-61.

Ozaslan, E. N., & Maden, Z, (2013). The use of PowerPoint presentations in the Department of Foreign Language Education at Middle East Technical University. Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, (2), 38-45.

Schcolnik, M., & Kol, S. (1999). Using presentation software to enhance language learning. The Internet TESL Journal, 5(3). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Schcolnik-PresSoft.html

Sewasew, D., Mengestie, M., & Abate, G. (2015). A comparative study on PowerPoint presentation and traditional lecture method in material understandability, effectiveness and attitude. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(2), 234-243.

Shyamlee, S. D., & Phil, M. (2012). Use of Technology in English language teaching and learning: An analysis. 2012 International Conference on Language, Medias and Culture (pp. 150-156). Singapore.

Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 325-341.

Susskind, J. E. (2004). PowerPoints power in the classroom: Enhancing students self-efficacy and attitudes. Computers & Education, 45(2005), 203-215.

Szabo, A., & Hastings, N. (2000). Using IT in the undergraduate classroom: Should we replace the blackboard with PowerPoint? Computers & Education, 35(2000), 175-187.

Taylor, G. (2012). Making a place for PowerPoint in EFL classrooms. OnCUE Journal, 6(1), 41-51.

Yilmazel-Sahin, Y. (2007). Teacher education students perceptions of use of MS PowerPoint and the value of accompanying handouts (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Maryland, College Park, United States of America).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v21iSuppl.935

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 11118 times
PDF view: 2155 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Widya Hadiyanti



Indexed and abstracted in:

    

 

LLT Journal Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 23 No 1, 2020 till Vol 27 No 2, 2024

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.