Andi Dian Rahmawan, Sri Wiyanah


This study investigates how Sentence Master downloaded from Android can be used as a self-study media for students to promote Autonomous Learning to develop students’ comprehension on English sentence structure which is grammatically correct. Students can measure, by themselves, whether the material given during the teaching and learning process has been successfully learned. The result of this study is also intended to be used by the teachers and lecturers to indicate the successfulness of teaching and learning that have been conducted. This is an action research which 10 students of English Education Program of the University of PGRI Yogyakarta were employed as the objects of the research. They are tested to run the game of Sentence Master and the score will be recorded that benefits teacher to consider whether the learning process that has been conducted is successful. This study also investigates students’ difficulty on making English sentence. This study emerges results that Sentence Master helps students to understand English grammar better by employing the smart phone to promote Autonomous Learning. This media is used by the students as the indication whether they have the abilities to make good English sentences.




autonomous learning, Sentence Master, English sentence structure

Full Text:



Alhodiry, A. A. (2016). The Libyan EFL teachers ’ role in developing students ’ motivation, 232(April), 83–89.

Ali, G., Soleimani, H., & Bakhtiarvand, M. (2014). Exploring the influence of using technology on Iranian EFL students ’ motivation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 814–823.

Bolsunovskaya, L. M., Kemerova, N. S., Asadullina, L. I., Sentsov, A. E., & Chris, P. (2015). Promoting international students ’ autonomy : The experience of Tomsk Polytechnic University. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 215(June), 53–59.

Cai, H. (2012). E-learning and English teaching, 2, 841–846.

Celik, S. K. (2013). Language games as a part of edutainment, 93, 1249–1253.

Chou, T.-L., & ChanLin, L.-J. (2015). Autonomous ESL learning: “Read & reflect in English.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 357–360.

Cristina, T. (2015). The teacher ’ s role in building the student ` s range of autonomy, 203, 22–27.

Daskalovska, N., Koleva, L., & Ivanovska, B. (2012). Learner motivation and interest, 46, 1187–1191.

Degirmenci, N., & Yavuz, F. (2015). Pre- service teachers ’ attitudes t owards grammar teaching, 191, 1828–1832.

Dincer, A., Yesilyurt, S., & Takkac, M. (2012). The effects of autonomy-suppor engagement , achievement and competence in English speaking classrooms, 46, 3890–3894.

Egel, P. (2009). Learner autonomy in the language classroom : From teacher dependency to learner independency, 1(1), 2023–2026.

Farivar, A., & Rahimi, A. (2015). The impact of CALL on Iranian EFL learners â€TM autonomy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 644–649.

Goulao, M. de F., & Menedez, R. C. (2015). Learner autonomy and self-regulation in e-learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1900–1907.

Hamdi, R. (2016). Developing learner autonomy in vocabulary learning in classroom : How and why can it be fostered ? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232(April), 784–791.

Ismail, N., & Yusof, M. A. (2012). Using language learning contracts as a strategy to promote learner autonomy among ESL learners, 66, 472–480.

Ivanovska, B. (2015). Learner autonomy in foreign language education and in cultural context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180(November 2014), 352–356.

Jana, P., & Pamungkas, B. (2018). Pelatihan penelitian tindakan kelas bagi guru SD Negeri Guwosari. Abdimas Dewantara, 1(1), 39–46.

Karababa, Z. C., Eker, N., Serkan, R., & Ar, Õ. (2010). Descriptive study of learner ’ s level of autonomy : Voices from the Turkish language classes, 9, 1692–1698.

Laz, A. (2013). Learner autonomy and its implementation for language teacher training, 76, 460–464.

Masouleh, N. S., & Jooneghani, R. B. (2012). Autonomous learning: A teacher-less learning! Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 835–842.

Okumu, N. (2015). Fostering learner autonomy, 199, 85–93.

Popescu, A. (2014). Communication strategies for developing the learner ’ s autonomy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3489–3493.

Tran, T. Q., & Duong, T. M. (2018). EFL learners â€TM perceptions of factors in fl uencing learner autonomy development. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 1–6.

Vile, D. Ezgi A., & Buyukduman, I. (2013). Breaking the chains: Autonomous learners, 106, 570–575.

Vooren, V. Van, Casteleyn, J., & Mottart, A. (2012). The impact of teachers ’ beliefs on grammar instruction and students ’ grammar competences. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69(Iceepsy), 641–648.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Indexed and abstracted in:






This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

LLT Journal DOI:

p-ISSN: 1410-7201 (since 12 March 1998); e-ISSN: 2579-9533 (since 16 May 2017)

LLT Journal Vol 22, No 1 (current edition), publication date: 10 April 2019

View My Stats

Free counters!

  LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching is published by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Eduation Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.