Truly Almendo Pasaribu



This study aims at investigating metadiscourse markers in academic essays written by male and female students. With the goal in mind, 20 essays written by EFL female students and 20 essays written by EFL male students were chosen. These data were analyzed based on the metadiscourse framework proposed by Hyland (2005). The findings revealed that both male and female writers employed more interactive markers than interactional markers due to the fact that both genders inserted transition markers frequently to guide readers through the texts. However, a cultural factor may influence the writers’ tendency not to use transition markers showing arguments. Furthermore, although male students employed more interactional markers, female students used more markers in interactional sub-categories except self-mentions. Although it is assumed that women prefer to use a more personalized style, male writers in this study also personalized their essays by using self-mentions. One possible reason was that the use of these features tended to be more field-specific than gender-specific. The findings and discussion indicated that gender is not the only factor influencing the use of metadiscourse markers. Other possible variables discussed in this study should be taken into account.




metadiscourse, gender, discourse

Full Text:



D'angelo, L. (2008). Gender identity and authority in academic book reviews: An analysis of meta discourse across disciplines. Linguistica e Filologia, 27, 205-221.

Dardjowidjojo, S. (2006). The implementability of Western approaches in Eastern societies. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1), 1-20.

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 1232–1248.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper Colophon.

Lodico M. G., Spaulding D. T. & Voegtle K. H. (2006). Methods in educational research: From theory to practice. New York: Wiley.

Matei, M. (2011). The influence of age and gender on the selection of discourse markers in casual conversations. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov. Series IV: Philology and Cultural Studies, 4(53), 213-220.

Pasaribu, T. A. (2017) Male and female students’ use of textual discourse markers in writing academic essays. Journal of Language and Literature, 17(1).

Serholt, S. (2012). Hedges and boosters in academic writing: A study of gender differences in essays written by Swedish advanced learners of English. Retrieved from

Seyyedrezaie, Z. S. & Vahedi, V. S. (2017). Projecting gender identity through metadiscourse marking: Investigating writers’ stance taking in written discourse. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 301-310.

Shirzad & Jamali. (2013). Gender differences in EFL academic writing. New York: Lambert Publishing.

Subon, F. (2013) Gender differences in the use of linguistic forms in the speech of men and women in the Malaysian context. IOSR Journal of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS),13(3), 67-79.

Tse, P. & Hyland, K. (2008). Robot Kung fu’: Gender and professional identity in biology and philosophy reviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(7), 1232-124.

Wahab, A. (2006). Isu linguistik: Pengajaran bahasa dan sastra. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.

Waskita, D. (2008). Differences in men’s and women’s ESL academic writing at the University of Melbourne. Jurnal Socioteknologi, 7(14).

Yeganeh, M. T. & Ghoreyshi, S. M. (2015). Exploring gender differences in the use of discourse markers in Iranian academic research articles. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science, 192, 684 – 689.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Indexed and abstracted in:



Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


p-ISSN: 2597-470X (since 31 August 2017); e-ISSN: 2597-4718 (since 31 August 2017)

IJHS Journal Vol 1 No 2 publication date: 8 March 2018

Flag Counter

International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) is a scientific journal in English published twice a year, namely in September and March, by Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.