Interrogating Canonical World English Literature: Journey to the West and Romance of the Three Kingdoms

Indriyanto Kristiawan

Abstract


This paper aims to chart how literary work of non-Western origin is incorporated into World English Literature by giving example of two Chinese Classic Novels. Among the Chinese Classic Novels, Journey to the West is the novel that achieves wider popularity among Western scholars and canonized while other Chinese Classic Novels are not as popular especially among Western academia. The different reception is related also with how both novels are circulated, translated, and adapted from Chinese into English. The emphasis of this paper is to compare the issue of circulation, translation, and adaptation between Journey to the West and Romance of the Three Kingdoms as another Chinese Classic Novel. By comparing different issues of how both novels enter the Western World, this paper hopes to have an insight regarding how these two novels have different popularity among academic scholars.


Keywords: charting World English Literature, Chinese classics novels


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, R. E. "Teaches Journey to the West in World Literature Courses."

Retrieved on 20 October 2015 from http://www.columbia.edu/cu/weai/ex eas/resources/pdf/teaching-journeytowest-worldlit.pdf.

Damrosch, D. (2000). World literature to-day: From the old world to the whole world. Symplokē, 8. Retrieved on 19 October 2015 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4055047 1.

__________. (2003). What is world litera-ture? Princeton: Princeton Universi-ty Press.

__________. (2009). How to read world literature. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

__________. (-). Annenberg Learning, In-vitation to World Literature. Retrieved on 19 October 2015 from https://www.learner.org/courses/worl dlit/art-of-translation/index.html.

__________. (-). Annenberg Learning, In-vitation to World Literature. Retrieved on 19 October 2015 from http://www.learner.org/courses/worl dlit/journey-to-the-west/watch.

Foo, C. (2008). Cognitive strategy from the romance of the three kingdoms. Chinese Management Studies, 2(3).

Hargett, J. M. (1978). Review World Lit-erature Today. 52(2). Retrieved on 16 October 2015 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4013297 5.

Hassan, W. S. (2000). World Literature in the age of globalization: Reflections on an Anthology. College English, 63(1). Retrieved on 19 October 2015 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/379030.

Lai, W. (1994). From Protean ape to hand-some saint: The monkey king. Asian Folklore Studies, 53(1), 29-65. Retrieved on 19 May 2015 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1178559.

McLaren, A. (2008). Reviewed Work: Three Kingdoms and Chinese Cul-ture by Kimberly Besio, Constantine Tung. Bulletin of the School of Ori-ental and African Studies, University of London, 71(2), 383-385. Retrieved on 20 October 2015 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4037878 6.

Moretti, F. (2004). Conjectures on world Literature. Debating World Litera-ture. Ed. Christopher Prendergast. (London, Verso).

Moss, R. (1995). Afterword to the abridged version: About three king-doms - Three kingdoms, a historical novel. Berkeley: University of Cali-fornia Press.

Pizer, J. (2000). Goethe’s world literature paradigm and contemporary cultural globalization. Comparative Litera-ture, 52(3). Retrieved on 19 October 2015 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1771407.

Plaks, A. H. (1977). Review. MLN, 92(5), 1116-1118. Retrieved on 16 October 2015 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1771407.

Solomons, J. Red Cliff-Review. The Guardian. Retrieved on 30 Septem-ber 2015 from http://www.theguardian.com/film/20 09/jun/14/red-cliff-john-woo.

West, A. C. (1995). Review. Chinese Lit-erature: Essay, articles, reviews (CLEAR), 17(-). Retrieved on 28 September 2015 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/495562.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.